
Non-profit science education organization building public resilience against climate misinformation. More at https://xitter.cf/t.co/ctYVbM0Vdv and @SkepticalScienc[email protected]
- Tweets15.6K
- Following348
- Followers20.2K
- Likes892

ALT Screenshot of a part of the Skeptical Science New Research for Week #40 2024, shown are just the first two topics out of these: Included cateogries: - Physical science of climate change, effects - Observations of climate change, effects - Instrumentation & observational methods of climate change, effects - Modeling, simulation & projection of climate change, effects - Advancement of climate & climate effects modeling, simulation & projection - Paleoclimate & paleogeochemistry - Biology & climate change, related geochemistry - GHG sources & sinks, flux, related geochemistry - CO2 capture, sequestration science & engineering - Decarbonization - Geoengineering climate - Black carbon - Aerosols - Climate change communications & cognition - Agronomy, animal husbundry, food production & climate change - Hydrology, hydrometeorology & climate change - Climate change economics - Climate change mitigation public policy research - Climate change adaptation & adaptation public policy research ...
![Screenshots of two fact briefs:
Question 1: Is recent global warming part of a natural cycle?
Answer: NO - While natural cycles explain some historical periods of climate change, the current one is due to human activity. [...]
Question 2: Does manmade CO2 have any detectable fingerprint?
Answer: YES - Atmospheric chemistry shows that humans are driving the recent CO2 increase. [...]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXb8OV_XkAAtuD7.jpg?name=small&format=webp)
ALT Screenshots of two fact briefs: Question 1: Is recent global warming part of a natural cycle? Answer: NO - While natural cycles explain some historical periods of climate change, the current one is due to human activity. [...] Question 2: Does manmade CO2 have any detectable fingerprint? Answer: YES - Atmospheric chemistry shows that humans are driving the recent CO2 increase. [...]






![Fact Brief #18:
Q: Do volcanoes emit more CO2 than humans?
A: NO - Volcanoes release CO2, but the amount is minimal compared to human-caused emissions. [..]
https://sks.to/gfb-volcano](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ga0HHBwacAApZDB.jpg?name=small&format=webp)
![Screenshot of fact brief #17
Q: Is more CO2 a good thing because it’s plant food?
A: NO - While CO2 is necessary for plant growth, the negative impacts of climate change, driven by man-made CO2 emissions, far outweigh short-term productivity gains. [..]
Full text: https://sks.to/gfb-plant](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GZtZ5TYWEAES6bk.jpg?name=small&format=webp)






![Fact Brief #12:
Q: Are carbon dioxide emissions from human activities enough to affect the climate?
A: YES - Neither land nor oceans have been able to adequately absorb the extra CO2 released by our fossil fuel burning, causing atmospheric CO2 to rise and affect our climate. [..]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GUuejXHXsAEpqqp.jpg?name=small&format=webp)
![Screenshot of fact brief #11:
Fact Brief #11:
Q: Are polar bears endangered?
A: YES - Most polar bear populations could become extinct by 2100 if our greenhouse gas emissions continue.[...]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GUudhEeX0AAUGsH.jpg?name=small&format=webp)
![Screenshot of fact brief:
Fact Brief #10:
Q: Were scientists caught falsifying data in the hacked emails incident dubbed 'climategate'?
A: NO - Nine separate investigations found that climate scientists involved in the “climategate” controversy did not falsify data.[...]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GUuc9pIWQAA3Ux5.jpg?name=small&format=webp)



