Assistant Professor @NYUSociology. Forgets to cancel after the free trial.

Joined March 2007
Large language models offer new opportunities for behavioural science, but their rapid evolution poses serious challenges for research rigour. We published a consensus-based reporting checklist to improve transparency, reproducibility and ethical accountability of large-language-model-based research in the behavioural sciences in Nature Human Behaviour. nature.com/articles/s41562-0… Here is a link to our checklist for research transparents: llm-checklist.com/ It supports researchers in clearly describing how LLMs were used, why specific methodological choices were made, and what steps were taken to ensure responsible research practices. This project was led by @stfeuerriegel and included a large list of expert coauthors from across numerous fields.
32
3
101
8,494
I’m delighted to share that the August 2025 special issue of Sociological Methods & Research on Generative AI is out. With my co-editor, Daniel Karell, we put together this issue to build on the conference we organized last year. Here's a thread on each of the 10 papers:
2
28
1
69
6,838
Extraordinarily grateful for the opportunity to join this community at CIFAR!
Meet the 2025–2027 CIFAR Azrieli Global Scholars! 🎉 We’re thrilled to welcome 12 exceptional early-career researchers to the CIFAR community. cifar.ca/cifarnews/2025/05/2…
3
10
847
Happy to share this new paper with @beckyj1! ✏️
Excited to share a new paper with @simonezhang on parental perceptions of using algorithms to allocate scarce resources in schools, now out in Sociological Science (@SociologicalSci)! (1/5)
3
3
1
26
2,197
Updated version now out Sociological Methods & Research Paper link: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.… Preprint link: osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/4e…
New working paper on the emerging use of AI among online survey participants: Focusing on open-ended Qs, we study how often and why survey-takers use AI. We also compare human vs LLM written answers to sensitive questions. 🔗: osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/4e…
2
8
1
45
4,012
Many thanks to our research assistants, reviewers, and terrific special issue editors @thomasrdavidson and Danny Karell. Special thank you to the incredible community resource that is the Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences (TESS) program
2
162
📢 AI Snake Oil is out today! I have too many feelings because this book has been five years in the making. In 2019 I gave a talk on AI Snake Oil and tweeted out the slides. I had no idea my career was about to change. Within a couple of days I had 30 or 40 invites to write a book or an article. I said no to all of them because I felt I needed to do more research to be able to write a book. So when @sayashk joined my team I knew this was the topic we were going to work on. The book is based on our research on limits to prediction, the dangers of predictive decision making, the reproducibility crisis in machine learning based science, the limits of large language models, and the risks of social media algorithms. The book is not an anti-technology screed. If our point was that all AI is useless, we wouldn’t need a book to say it. It’s precisely because of AI’s usefulness in many areas that overhyped claims and outright snake oil have been so successful in the market. It’s hard for people to tell these apart, and we hope our book can help. And while we think the tech industry should have much more accountability, the harms we describe are usually not solely due to tech, and much more often due to AI being an amplifier of existing problems in our society. A recurring pattern we point out in the book is that "broken AI is appealing to broken institutions" (Chapter 8). Since our book talks about what AI can’t do, AI boosters often tell us it’s going to be outdated soon. If you think so, I’d love to have a friendly bet! Read the book and tell us what you think will be wrong in two years or five years. (You can start with the intro chapter, which is available online; the link is in my pinned tweet.) The reason we’re confident of our assessments is that they are not based on limitations of the technology. Instead, they are based on inherent limits to prediction grounded in our sociological analysis. (The book owes a huge debt to Princeton sociologist @msalganik; our collaboration with him informed and inspired the book.) We also talk a lot about what we shouldn’t use AI for, even if we can. We’ve had many moments of hope and trepidation for the book as we worked on it over the years. We’re so grateful for the early interest the book has had, especially to the 40,000 people who subscribe to the AI Snake Oil newsletter, and the many podcasts that have had us on to talk about the book. We’ve had great reviews in The New Yorker, Publishers' Weekly (featured in the Top 10 science books for Fall 2024), and many other outlets. And we’ve had such a wonderful experience working with Princeton University Press. We’re also fortunate to have received incisive peer reviews from @MelMitchell1 , @mollycrockett , @chris_bail, and three anonymous reviewers. The book is so much better as a result. What's in the book Chapter 1: Introduction. We begin with a summary of our main arguments in the book. We discuss the definition of AI (and more importantly, why it is hard to come up with one), how AI is an umbrella term, what we mean by AI Snake Oil, and who the book is for. The entire introduction is available online. See the link in my pinned tweet. Chapter 2: How predictive AI goes wrong. Predictive AI is used to make predictions about people—will a defendant fail to show up for trial? Is a patient at high risk of negative health outcomes? Will a student drop out of college? These predictions are then used to make consequential decisions. Developers claim predictive AI is groundbreaking, but in reality it suffers from a number of shortcomings that are hard to fix. Chapter 3: Can AI predict the future? Are the shortcomings of predictive AI inherent, or can they be resolved? In this chapter, we look at why predicting the future is hard — with or without AI. While we have made consistent progress in some domains such as weather prediction, we argue that this progress cannot translate to other settings, such as individuals' life outcomes, the success of cultural products like books and movies, or pandemics. Chapter 4: The long road to generative AI. Recent advances in generative AI can seem sudden, but they build on a series of improvements over seven decades. In this chapter, we retrace the history of computing advances that led to generative AI. Chapter 5: Is advanced AI an existential threat? Claims about AI wiping out humanity are common. Here, we critically evaluate claims about AI's existential risk and find several shortcomings and fallacies in popular discussion of x-risk. We discuss approaches to defending against AI risks that improve societal resilience regardless of the threat of advanced AI. Chapter 6: Why can't AI fix social media? One area where AI is heavily used is content moderation on social media platforms. We discuss the current state of AI use on social media, and highlight seven reasons why improvements in AI alone are unlikely to solve platforms' content moderation woes. Chapter 7: Why do myths about AI persist? Companies, researchers, and journalists all contribute to AI hype. We discuss how myths about AI are created and how they persist. In the process, we hope to give you the tools to read AI news with the appropriate skepticism and identify attempts to sell you snake oil. Chapter 8: Where do we go from here? While the previous chapter focuses on the supply of snake oil, in the last chapter, we look at where the demand for AI snake oil comes from. We also look at the impact of AI on the future of work, the role and limitations of regulation, and conclude with vignettes of the many possible futures ahead of us. We have the agency to determine which path we end up on, and each of us can play a role. ------- We hope you find the book useful and look forward to hearing what you think.
38
111
32
530
87,729
New working paper on the emerging use of AI among online survey participants: Focusing on open-ended Qs, we study how often and why survey-takers use AI. We also compare human vs LLM written answers to sensitive questions. 🔗: osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/4e…
4
36
5
125
18,868
Joint work with @aj_alvero and Janet Xu. Comments and suggestions welcome!
1
450
There was James Scott the academic, James Scott the activist, and James Scott the person. They were all top-quality. I was lucky to see all these sides. May his memory be a blessing and may his work continue to inspire us.
1
4
59
4,401
New paper out in @socprobsjournal! 🎉🎉🎉 Through a qual case study, I examine how privatization influences the way marginalized groups experience the US social safety net and find mixed consequences for stigma, paternalism, and disentitlement. More here: doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spae0…
5
14
1
82
5,939
📣📢 new paper 📣📢 “Strategic Evaluation: Subjects, Evaluators, and Society” by me, Jon Kleinberg, Karen Levy (@karen_ec_levy), and Helen Nissenbaum (@HNissenbaum). Available & soon to be published at #EAAMO2023 (@ACMEAAMO)!
2
7
49
5,778
Simone Zhang retweeted
I love this @jenniferbouek paper. WAITLISTS ARE POLITICAL. MA's subsidized #childcare waitlist fell from 60k to 15k over 5 yrs—not bc families got subsidies but bc an audit drew attn to the list. Now, those who don't respond to a mailed letter are purged. rsfjournal.org/content/9/5/7…
2
5
20
4,434
The Mentoring Committee will sponsor an online panel discussion on Navigating the Job Market on August 10, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time. Registration link coming out via email!
1
1
5
1,394
📢 The full agenda for Data (Re)Makes the World is out! Join us this weekend, March 31 - April 1, 2023. All times are ET. Register here for zoom access to the conference: eventbrite.com/e/zoom-only-r… Check out the agenda on our website: law.yale.edu/isp/events/data…
2
12
4
19
12,887
🚨📄 out now in @nature @ScientificData with @tylersimko: rdcu.be/c7Hq3 We introduce LocalView: a comprehensive dataset of over 100,000 real-time U.S. local government public meeting videos from 1,000+ localities (and counting). 🧵 1/5
7
87
21
270
64,798
A great opportunity in the Keough School of Global Affairs - technology, ethics, and poverty!
📣FACULTY JOB OPPORTUNITY📣 We're excited to team up with @KeoughGlobalND to invite applicants for a tenure-track (open-rank) professorship focused in the area of technology, ethics, and poverty. LEARN MORE ➡️ techethics.nd.edu/news-and-e…
2
1
1,042
Simone Zhang retweeted
presenting down the block at the @Georgetown sociology colloquium (thanks @alyssamnewman and @gozdeguran ) ! working paper w/ @simonezhang on how polarization among K-12 parents extends to algorithms vs rules vs parents in targeting ESSER-funded tutoring: tinyurl.com/algsparents
1
4
46
4,240
Replication materials here: dataverse.harvard.edu/datase… (11/12)
1
12
759
We’re grateful to our interviewees and everyone who has offered feedback, including our reviewers and two generations of ASR editors. It’s been a dream to work with @beckyj1 on this project, which started from a chance conversation in the student lounge @PUSociology. (12/12)
13
772