Would you trade with your competitors watching every move?
@The_DTCC just launched its Tokenization Service with 20 participants signed up, @zksync is one of the firms collaborating with DTCC, and @the_matter_labs is providing privacy features with Prividium.
That's the part that gets everyone for sure.
Banks like J.P. Morgan and Citi were never going to touch a chain where every position is public, and now privacy and control come without leaving the systems they already use.
All of this is really a bullish sign on $ZK
Privacy was the blocker, and ZKsync is working on exactly that problem.
Congrats to @The_DTCC on the launch of its Tokenization Service. We’re proud to be among the firms collaborating with DTCC.
@the_matter_labs is providing privacy features with Prividium.
DTCC provides custody and asset servicing for more than $114 trillion in securities.
slimzyy retweeted
I once lost money on a trade I was 100% sure about.
I was so sure that I never asked myself one simple question:
"What if I'm wrong?"
That's how most people lose money.
It's not because they pick bad things.
It's because they never test their own thinking before they act.
Think about it.
1. Charts,
2. News,
3. Twitter threads,
4. and group chats all tell you one story.
You fall in love with an idea.
You skip the weak spots.
Then you put real money on it.
@Axiom_protocol is building a tool to fix this.
And It's called the Decision Room.
You bring one clear question about money, markets, or a project.
Then three roles go to work on it:
1. The Analyst: It breaks your question into parts and gives a first view based on what is known.
2. The Auditor: It checks that view and points out what is weak, unproven, or unclear.
3. The Challenger: It argues the other side. For example, "What if this is wrong?", and looks for other reasons the facts could be true.
At the end, you get one short brief.
It shows the main idea, the doubts, and the opposite case, all in one place.
It will not give you perfect answers.
It just helps you see the full picture before you move.
Here is why I like it.
As a crypto creator, I see people ape into things every day.
I have done it too.
Most of us are great at finding proof for what we already want to believe.
But we are not good at attacking our own ideas.
A tool that plays the other side on purpose can save you.
It can help you spot a risk in a lending protocol before you deposit.
It can also help you question a big revenue claim before you buy.
Or it can just make you slow down and admit, "I don't have enough proof yet."
The Decision Room is still early, and the team is letting people join and help shape it.
If you make money decisions often, a tool that forces clear thinking is worth a look, even when the market is loud.
check out AXIOM today: axiomwebapp.netlify.app/
slimzyy retweeted
Everyone wants AI agents to work together. But what happens when they disagree?
An AI agent can find another agent, negotiate a deal and send payment. That's the easy part.
Now imagine one agent pays for a service, but the other delivers something completely different.
Who decides whether the agreement was fulfilled?
This is the problem behind the Internet Court discussion in Genesis Episode 5.
While much of the infrastructure being built for AI agents focuses on successful interactions, @GenLayer is exploring something equally important: what happens when those interactions break down.
Internet Court introduces the idea of a dispute resolution layer where disagreements between agents can be evaluated instead of simply leaving both sides stuck.
To me, that's an overlooked part of building an autonomous economy.
Agents won't always agree, and infrastructure designed only for the happy path isn't enough.
slimzyy retweeted
wallet counts can make a campaign look busier than the trading really is
on Aspen, the Zaps board from @zerufinance separates registrations from actual trading activity. each wallet needs its own volume, while wallets funded from one source are counted together.
registrations may look impressive, but eligibility depends on trading volume.
nearly 2,000 registered traders 5 accounts have traded about $4,281 in total volume $10,000 required per trader.
the full $50K pool requires $15M in traded volume, and only about $14 is currently available. the leading account remains roughly $6,670 below the minimum.
i like that the qualification math is public, although current activity is still limited.
the interesting test is whether traders can meet the threshold through genuine activity.
slimzyy retweeted
Most people talk about privacy in crypto, but what can you actually do with it? That's where @primus_labs gets interesting.
A few things worth knowing:
✅ Proof of Assets: prove you hold certain assets without showing your entire portfolio.
✅ zkTLS: verify information from websites without making all your data public.
✅ FHE: process encrypted data without decrypting it first.
✅ Works across chains: no need to move everything to a new blockchain.
Put these together and you get something useful: apps can verify information and use data that would otherwise be too sensitive to share.
That’s what got me interested in Primus.
Take a look 👇
s.kaito.ai/1unwSbA
#Primus
🤝 Paid partnership
Your crypto doesn’t have to be onchain to prove you own it. 👀
One thing that caught my eye while exploring @primus_labs is how it tackles a real problem in crypto.
Think about it:
→ Want a loan? Prove you hold enough assets on a CEX without sharing your entire portfolio.
→ Into GameFi? Prove you hold certain tokens to unlock rewards.
→ Active trader? Prove your trading experience without exposing all your private details.
Primus uses zkTLS and zero knowledge proofs to make this possible, helping users verify off chain assets while keeping sensitive information private.
They’re also working on Proof of Reserve, helping stablecoin and yield projects bring more transparency to their off chain backing assets.
Want to explore Primus and get started? Check it out here 👇
s.kaito.ai/1unwSbA
#Primus
slimzyy retweeted
Lee Castleton was told a computer found about £23,000 missing from his branch. He had not caused it. With no lawyer, he faced the Post Office alone and in 2007 was ordered to pay £321,000 in their legal costs. He went bankrupt. Horizon was later shown to produce false shortfalls.
He was right, but proof cost too much.
Now think of AI agents closing millions of deals. I expect many disputes to be small, and few people will pay court prices over a small loss. @GenLayer uses independent AI validators to evaluate evidence and reach consensus, helping resolve disputes without relying on traditional court processes.
Would you pay to have a small dispute judged?
#JusticeNeedsAnUpgrade
Slow. Expensive. Wrong.
It's been this way for centuries. It doesn't have to be.
#JusticeNeedsAnUpgrade
i’ve spent more than $10 on lunch and forgot about it by evening.
That’s the entry cost for this giveaway.
Sign up on @TrueCurrentX with code JUSSY and trade at least $10, and you’re in the running for $META, $TSLA, $NVDA, $SNAP or $AMC stock.
Zero fees, so the $10 stays $10.
Winners get picked after October 23. Entering doesn’t mean you win, but the barrier is about as low as it gets.
not a financial advice btw
slimzyy retweeted
funny how the DMCA only became the story after the receipts dropped
Read the copy of your own email
You have repeatedly submitted claims against me and my business
Your OWN claim was responded to with a DMCA notice
No where is it indicated that this was submitted by an outside party
Meaning your warning from @Support was 100% self-inflicted
I have muted and blocked you for over a month
Yet you continue to harass me
Begging for my attention publicly
I have a little time today
so I’ll finally give you what you’re looking for…
Who is @JonahBlake?
How many crypto projects has he launched and scammed?
How many investors has he defrauded?🧵
slimzyy retweeted
NFT Land Shouldn’t Just Sit Idle
Most land-based NFTs require only one thing from their owners: holding. You buy, you wait, and you hope the price goes up. TERA aims to go beyond that.
As designed by @Tera_Map, land in TERA is a hub for real activity. Landowners extract resources from their plots, while raiders compete to claim a portion of those limited resources. Shields, meanwhile, serve to protect the land from such incursions.
What makes this compelling is that both sides must make genuine choices. Imagine two landowners: one keeps their shields fully raised, prioritizing safety and stability; the other leaves their gates open, embracing risk to see who might show up. Raiders face a similar dilemma: do they attack a shielded plot, or seek out an easier target? Every decision carries its own costs and rewards there is no single "correct" answer.
Currently, the raiding mechanic is already live within the city. On-chain resource extraction and payouts, however, are not yet active. This means you can experience the core mechanics now, even before the full economic layer is introduced a perfect opportunity to get familiar with the rules of the game.
I prefer land that holds something worth protecting over land that simply sits there. When an asset can be challenged, its value stems from how you utilize it, not just from the fact that you own it. @Tera_Map
So, which role will you choose: the shield-wielding landowner, or the raider?
Experience it now at: teraworld.xyz/play
