Pinned Tweet
what do you call the part where a free society can still save itself
but doesn’t
there should be a word for that
I think about this often. A third of the the country has turned into walking devils. You can smell the inner hatred from a mile away. These people have been radicalized for 10 years, absorbing Fox News and Trumps hate for 10 fucking years. This is not a Christian country anymor
Professor retweeted
BREAKING: Dallas Country has surpassed 2024 Presidential-year turnout on the first day of early voting in 2026
Professor retweeted
Age, not gender, is SPLITTING Texas.
U.S. Senate, Texas likely voters
🔵18-29 - Talarico 74, Paxton 22
🔵30-44 - Talarico 61, Paxton 29
🔴45-64 - Paxton 46, Talarico 41
🔴65+ - Paxton 58, Talarico 38
If you guys think I’m just being a hateful person when I say that the current structure of ICE, they were trained by the IDF, the entire fucking chain of command traces back to the IDF. This is not a conspiracy. It’s the fucking truth. ICE is the IDF’s psyop against America
Professor retweeted
FORBIDDEN STUDIOS PRESENTS:
THE NEWEST WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY
Her first press briefing went exactly as expected.
Professor retweeted
A computer glitch delayed almost 600,000 voter registrations in Texas.
Looks like the Republican cheating has begun.
Professor retweeted
I have just been informed by the Dutch Minister of Immigration that I am to be banned from some 30 countries in the Schengen border system for another two years – making now six in total since 2022. If you are banned from one you are banned from all. Crazy, but true. I am apparently considered a ‘potential danger to public order’ as a ‘known spreader of conspiracy theories’ and it has been made clear that I will continue to be banned indefinitely unless I ‘change my views’. Let that sink in.
I don’t think people realise the fundamental importance of this case to freedom of speech with a lawyer from the European Commission seeking to change the law to make what has happened to me easier to impose on anyone else. I have so far been banned first by the government of Mark Rutte, now Secretary General of NATO, for the ‘crime’ of agreeing to speak at a PEACE rally in Amsterdam in 2022.
This was reimposed in 2024 by the government party of right-wing ‘alternative hero’ Geert Wilders and now by the leftist government of Rob Jetten, once the Minister for Climate and Energy Policy in Rutte’s government. ‘Right’ or ‘Left’ it doesn’t matter. They all agree that deleting freedom of opinion is good.
This is part of the letter sent to me today by Jetten’s Minister of Asylum and Migration and Deputy Prime Minister, Bart van den Brink. How sinister can you get?
‘It has been found that you are still considered a (potential) danger to the public order. To this end, I consider the following. In the previous (extension) procedures about your alert, I have … concluded that you pose a (potential) danger to public order, because you have been identified as a (known) spreader of conspiracy theories and statements that may contribute to anti-institutional extremism [by] your supporters.
Openly and uncritically discussing conspiracy theories can lead to social acceptance of anti-Semitism, xenophobia … and racism. [I was invited to speak at the PEACE rally by a Jewish man].
Such theories can lead to national figures being elite groups that would control society and/or in which prominent persons, administrators and civil servants are dehumanized and democratic principles are rejected. [‘emocratic’ principles which include banning someone from 30 countries for opinions you don’t like].
Your statements can also contribute to anti-government extremism. That you have not changed in this respect is shown by the following recent expressions and behaviour. For example, from your contribution in the video "David Icke & lawyer Jeroen Pols about new twist in EU ban lawsuit" on the YouTube channel LighthouseTV of 1 October 2026, following the hearing before the CJEU, it appears … clearly that you do not have any control over your ideas, beliefs and behaviours … and that you wish to amend the alert measure as a confirmation of your own conspiracy theory.
That you still actively propagate your conspiracy theories and appear to be actively spreading from your video "I Predicted It All More Than 30 Years Ago – The REAL Reason Why Energy Is Being Targeted", posted on October 1, 2026 on your Ickonic.com … website, and can be seen on your David Icke YouTube channel. The social threat posed by the spread of anti-institutional extremism, to which your statements are is still topical.’
This is the link by the way: youtube.com/watch?v=IVszVw8m…
If that was written in China or North Korea no one would be surprised, but this is the Netherlands and the EU. We don’t like what you say and so you are, in effect, banned from the whole of Europe and they claim that I am the ‘threat to democracy’. It may one day dawn on this bewildered gentlemen that in banning me for my opinion he is proving me right and that ‘anti-government’ sentiment is caused not by me, but by the behaviour of governments the world over. His Damascus experience won’t be soon, though, clearly.
We have been challenging the ban for four years working through the court levels of the Netherlands as judges walked into court with symbolic rubber stamps on their person saying ‘the government is right’. We have now reached the European Court of Justice when on September 29th some 17 judges attended the court in Luxembourg to offer their opinion if the original ban was fair. They will not report until January 28th and then other courts are involved.
All this for agreeing to speak at a PEACE rally in Amsterdam for 20 minutes and then come home. Pinch me, it can’t be true. Ouch! – hell, it is.
To think there are moronic people posting from their mum’s spare bedroom saying that I’m not really banned because I am ‘controlled opposition’. Should I laugh or cry? Oh, definitely laugh.
Professor retweeted
This is not red lightning as AccuWeather and the MSM is trying to convince you of. These are called SPRITES. They are always way above our clouds and you never get to see them. So the question is, why are they being seen so close to the ground?
Professor retweeted
An ICE agent in Texas ran down and ran over a man this weekend.
Then, ICE lied about it: "Parra-Hernandez ran in front of an ICE vehicle and was struck."
Watch the video and see.
abc7.com/story/ice-runs-man-…
Professor retweeted
How MAGA hallucinations became real
I pay for the data behind these myself and it take a lot of time and effort to analyze and create these graphics. If you want more of them, SUPPORT LINKS ARE IN BIO
At 1:05 p.m. on Oct 11, Nick Sortor posted that an Ohio mental hospital “CONFIRMS” James Talarico was discharged. That evening the hospital said Talarico never received treatment there. Talarico says he's never even been to Ohio. Rhein Amacher, who made the recorded call, posted that he made up a verification code to get past the front desk.
This story occurred over several days. Ken Paxton called Talarico “missing” on Oct 7. Sara Gonzales teased “unverified information” that would “END his campaign” on Oct 8. On Oct 9, Spencer Pratt said his sources put Talarico in a mental health facility, and a handful of accounts pasted near-identical “credible sources are leaking” posts. At 7:50 a.m. on the 11th, Sortor gave Talarico a deadline, “let us know by 1pm ET today.”
The earlier pushes never fully took off, and acted more as a booster for the posts that came later. Pratt's post got 6.4 million views, but only about 60 accounts posted about the story in the hour after it. Caroline Wren's private-plane theory the next day drew about 40. Before the 11th, the story never topped 80 posts an hour. In the first hour after Sortor's post, 267 accounts posted about it, and by 3 p.m. it was running at almost 500 posts an hour.
The first chart counts each account only once, at its first post about the story. Nothing they posted after that is counted, so it shows who started this and how far those first posts went. The first wave carried the whole thing. Sortor's post and the posts that followed in the next 12 minutes have 9 million views between them. The 55 accounts that joined in the first 20 minutes got 80% of the views in that lane. The other lines never came close. “He lied and covered it up,” the line Elon Musk and Richard Grenell pushed, got about 2 million views across 100 accounts. “He was in an Ohio mental hospital” got about 2 million across 132.
The pushback grew the opposite way, the way a real response does. It started small and kept building all afternoon and evening, with 12 to 46 new accounts joining every hour from 1 p.m. to 10 p.m. Leave out the three biggest posts, which were the hospital's statement, Talarico's reply and Ed Krassenstein's own call to the hospital, and regular accounts pushing back still reached 6 million views. The claim had nearly 90% of its views by 2 p.m. and barely grew after that. By the end of the night, the pushback had more views than the claim, 13 million to 11.4 million.
The second chart is the inorganic behavior, and it covers Oct 8 to 11, not just the day of the "exclusive". Sortor's headline was reposted word for word, or nearly, by 18 other accounts, half of them with under 1,000 followers. Caroline Wren's private-plane post was copied by 14. Four accounts posted the same Eric Daugherty post within 74 seconds of each other. Four more posted the same MAGAVoice line within 54 seconds, four hours after it first went up. Some accounts barely post anything of their own. One copied 21 of its 23 posts about Talarico from other accounts, another 11 of 11. And the spammers flooded the replies. One pasted the same reply 85 times in about two hours, another 15 times in 10 minutes.
Views are each post's total as of early Oct 12. A copy means word for word or at least 90% the same as an earlier post.
I pulled and analyzed about 14,000 posts for this. Sharing it helps more than anything, and if you want to chip in so I can keep doing this, the links are in my bio. It goes a long way.
