Father, sales nerd, market enthusiast, Austrian economics / hard money advocate, primal health nut, truth seeker, Yah follower / commandment keeper

Morgan Hill, CA
Joined December 2010
What if the “Christian Messiah” was being described long before Christianity ever existed? Torah says a Seed is coming. Moses says a Prophet is coming. David sees a Son, a King, and a Priest. Isaiah sees a suffering Servant. Daniel sees a heavenly Son of Man. Enoch sees that Son of Man judging kings. Zechariah sees the King arrive humble, get pierced, and later rule... Then Yeshua shows up and starts pulling all of those threads together. That is the point of this series: Yeshua was not dropped into the story in the first century. He was the story unfolding. And this is where it gets uncomfortable. If Messiah was only supposed to conquer, the cross looks like failure. But if Scripture already said the Messiah would be rejected, suffer, be pierced, be cut off, rise, serve as High Priest, then return as King... Then the cross was not the collapse of the Messianic claim.. It was part of the blueprint! One Messiah. Two advents. First the Lamb. Then the King. First the suffering Servant. Then the conquering Son of Man. First rejected by men. Then revealed to the nations. And if the Father really gave Yeshua authority to raise the dead, judge mankind, and reign over the coming Kingdom, then the most important question is not: “Did Jesus exist?” It is: “Who do you say that I am?” Full Substack: saul2paul.substack.com/p/the… 🎥 Part 1: youtu.be/lhwAuuWx0zw?si=2W3r… 🎥 Part 2: youtu.be/IF5foREaIrM?si=VSSE… 🎥 Part 3: Coming soon.. The Son was promised. The Son came. The Son lives. And the Son of Man is coming again. Amen?
🤖 Made with AI
1
3
90