$LQTY IS PART OF THE ALGORITHMIC-STABLECOIN EXPERIMENT
Stablecoins are becoming one of crypto's most important sectors.
But the big question remains:
How do you create stable value without depending entirely on traditional banking rails?
#Liquity #LQTY #Stablecoins
Many people don’t know this, but Liquity makes no revenue.
Neither V1 nor V2 withholds any fees.
100% of the revenue goes back to users.
We developed the product as a public good that serves the Ethereum community. One that is immutable, decentralized, and economically sound.
We launched the two most decentralized stablecoins in existence - BOLD and LUSD - and consistently offer some of the most competitive borrow and earn rates on the market.
And we’ll keep doing exactly that.
$lqty
الأهداف كاملة
$LQTY | UNUSUAL SPOT VOLUME
257.0x usual over 5 min
Traded: 32,248.01 USDT
Usual: 125.46 USDT
BINANCE Spot
18 Sep 2026 10:49:00 UTC
These stats don't detail how $LQTY consistently benefits from $BOLD's growth.
Why? Because it doesn't.
Liquity's team is concerned any PIL initiative benefiting $LQTY would compete against $BOLD's liquidity with other stablecoins.
If PIL is robust, this shouldn't be a concern.
The market is getting BOLD-er 📊
Last 30 days:
- BOLD supply grew from $30m to $37m
- Liquity V2 TVL +37%
- BOLD holders 1481 → 1523
$ETH borrowers are paying 2% on their ETH 🤯
$BOLD holders are earning 7% with an unstoppable dollar 💪
join them: liquity.app/
Replying to @huanhuansun2004 @LiquityProtocol
They're concerned the proposal would attract the majority of $LQTY votes away from PIL initiatives that sustain $BOLD's liquidity with other #stablecoins.
Game theory and incentives should counterbalance their concern. This proposal would thus stress test if PIL is truly robust.
"so the protocol is doing two things at once: keeping capital inside the system while also sending part of its earnings back into SKY purchases..."
This is akin to what a permanent $BOLD + $LQTY pool grown in perpetuity from PIL would offer Liquity's ecosystem, @svobodamichael.
"if USDS grows, more capital gets deployed and Sky produces more surplus, the amount allocated to buying $SKY grows with it."
This is like my proposal for @LiquityProtocol to link $BOLD's growth to a permanent $LQTY pool via a portion of v2's PIL revenue: nitter.cf/Syncubate/status/20851…
sky now creates a buyer for $SKY every month it produces net surplus.
to buy and hold $SKY now, you increasingly need to believe Sky can keep growing the amount of surplus the protocol produces.
under Stage 2, that surplus now has a clear allocation.
for every $100 of monthly Net Protocol Surplus:
- $50 stays in the Surplus Buffer
- $22.50 is used to buy SKY for staking rewards
- $22.50 goes to USDS staking rewards
- $5 is used to buy SKY and burn it permanently
that means 27.5% of monthly net surplus is now used to buy $SKY from the open market.
if Sky produces $10m in surplus, $2.75m goes into SKY purchases. $2.25m worth goes to SKY stakers, while another $500k worth is permanently removed from circulation.
Sky just completed the first burn under this framework, buying 2.86m SKY from the market using the 5% burn allocation.
but the burn itself is only one part of the system.
the 5% burn permanently reduces supply, while the larger 22.5% allocation creates recurring demand for SKY and sends those tokens to stakers.
so the $SKY thesis is not simply that supply will keep falling.
it is that Sky has started tying demand for the token to the financial performance of the protocol.
if USDS grows, more capital gets deployed and Sky produces more surplus, the amount allocated to buying SKY grows with it.
at $20m of monthly surplus, $5.5m would be used to buy SKY.
at $40m, that becomes $11m.
at the same time, Sky is not distributing everything it earns. up to half of monthly surplus stays in the Surplus Buffer.
so the protocol is doing two things at once: keeping capital inside the system while also sending part of its earnings back into SKY purchases and staking rewards.
a lot of defi tokens still depend on the idea that more users, more tvl or more revenue will somehow become valuable to the token later.
Sky has made that relationship more direct.
you can now take the monthly Net Protocol Surplus and calculate how much goes into buying SKY, how much gets burned, how much rewards stakers and how much stays inside the protocol.
the 2.86m SKY burn is just one output of that system.
the bigger bet is whether Sky can keep growing the surplus that feeds it.
Over five years ago, @robert_lauko detailed how @LiquityProtocol differs from MakerDAO: youtu.be/bXLTE-5BkhA?si=ql8Y…
Now banks are covering what was formerly MakerDAO.
Without marketing and tokenomics alignment around $LQTY, Liquity's ecosystem will stagnate: nitter.cf/Syncubate/status/20851…
United States
United StatesConnected via WebAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
THE BLOCK: Standard Chartered Bank has initiated coverage of Sky, calling it "DeFi's federal bank," and expects its ethereum:0x56072c95faa701256059aa122697b133aded9279 token to rise fivefold to $0.325 by the end of 2028.
StanChart expects growth in Sky's ethereum:0xdc035d45d973e3ec169d2276ddab16f1e407384f stablecoin and wider ecosystem to drive higher staking rewards and token buybacks for SKY holders. "The main risk to this view would be if yield-bearing stablecoin growth is slower than expected," the bank said.
A timely reminder for @LiquityProtocol.
There's no lasting connection between its v2 stablecoin, $BOLD, and $LQTY.
$LQTY isn't just a protocol token. Its CEX listings make it a core marketing asset for Liquity's brand too, but it's been neglected as a growth catalyst for $BOLD.
took $LQTY from entry through the full sequence while the call was timestamped live and anyone watching saw it unfold 😋