Your argument contains several major historical and legal inaccuracies. Here is a point-by-point rebuttal. ⸻ 1. “🇹🇼Taiwan has always been an inseparable part of China.” This statement is historically false. For most of its history, Taiwan was •an island inhabited by its indigenous peoples, •later governed by Spain and the Netherlands, •then ruled by the Zheng regime (effectively an independent state). In other words, Taiwan spent far more time outside any Chinese rule than under it. ⸻ 2. “The Yuan dynasty governed Taiwan.” The Yuan dynasty was the Mongol Empire, not a Chinese nation-state. If you claim “Yuan = China,” then Mongolia, large parts of Central Asia, and Korea would all become “ancient Chinese territories.” This logic collapses instantly. ⸻ 3. “Qing ruled Taiwan for about 200 years, so it is Chinese.” The Qing dynasty was a Manchu empire, not a Han Chinese state. The fact that Taiwan was once governed by the Qing does not mean it was part of a continuous Chinese nation-state. Empires shift borders constantly. International law does not treat historical empires as evidence of eternal sovereignty. ⸻ 4. “The Cairo Declaration returned Taiwan to China.” This is the most serious error. The Cairo Declaration: •was not signed, •was not ratified, •was not a treaty, •and therefore has zero binding force under international law. It was a political statement — nothing more. China is one of the few governments that pretends it has legal weight. ⸻ 5. The legally binding decision came from the San Francisco Peace Treaty (1951). This is the decisive point in international law. The treaty states only: Japan renounces sovereignty over Taiwan. It does not say Taiwan belongs to China. Not once. Not anywhere. This means the final status of Taiwan was left undetermined. China’s sovereignty over Taiwan has never been legally confirmed. ⸻ 6. “The PRC replaced the ROC in the UN, therefore Taiwan is China.” Another major misunderstanding. UN Resolution 2758 dealt with China’s representation, not territorial sovereignty. It did not declare that Taiwan is part of the PRC. It did not settle the sovereignty issue. It only said: “Who represents China at the UN?” This has no legal effect on Taiwan’s political status. ⸻ 🔥 Your claims rely on •historical distortion, •misuse of international law, and •political narratives presented as facts. From a historical and legal perspective, Taiwan has never been confirmed as part of the PRC.