Nora retweeted
My brain broke when I read this paper.
A tiny 7 Million parameter model just beat DeepSeek-R1, Gemini 2.5 pro, and o3-mini at reasoning on both ARG-AGI 1 and ARC-AGI 2.
It's called Tiny Recursive Model (TRM) from Samsung.
How can a model 10,000x smaller be smarter?
Here's how it works:
1. Draft an Initial Answer: Unlike an LLM that writes word-by-word, TRM first generates a quick, complete "draft" of the solution. Think of this as its first rough guess.
2. Create a "Scratchpad": It then creates a separate space for its internal thoughts, a latent reasoning "scratchpad." This is where the real magic happens.
3. Intensely Self-Critique: The model enters an intense inner loop. It compares its draft answer to the original problem and refines its reasoning on the scratchpad over and over (6 times in a row), asking itself, "Does my logic hold up? Where are the errors?"
4. Revise the Answer: After this focused "thinking," it uses the improved logic from its scratchpad to create a brand new, much better draft of the final answer.
5. Repeat until Confident: The entire process, draft, think, revise, is repeated up to 16 times. Each cycle pushes the model closer to a correct, logically sound solution.
Why this matters:
Business Leaders: This is what algorithmic advantage looks like. While competitors are paying massive inference costs for brute-force scale, a smarter, more efficient model can deliver superior performance for a tiny fraction of the cost.
Researchers: This is a major validation for neuro-symbolic ideas. The model's ability to recursively "think" before "acting" demonstrates that architecture, not just scale, can be a primary driver of reasoning ability.
Practitioners: SOTA reasoning is no longer gated behind billion-dollar GPU clusters. This paper provides a highly efficient, parameter-light blueprint for building specialized reasoners that can run anywhere.
This isn't just scaling down; it's a completely different, more deliberate way of solving problems.
Nora retweeted
We’re very pleased to release our latest study ‘Emergence of Language in the Developing Brain’
Paper: tinyurl.com/5h49xpjv
Blog: tinyurl.com/mrtdk8p2
The first systematic investigation of how the neural representations of language evolve as the brain develops. A collaboration between @AIatMeta and @FondARothschild, with @JeanRemiKing.
Thread 👇
Nora retweeted
Can AI help understand how the brain learns to see the world?
Our latest study, led by @JRaugel from FAIR at @AIatMeta and @ENS_ULM, is now out!
📄 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.18226
🧵 A thread:
Nora retweeted
It was a pleasure working with our fellows @alexandraabbas, Helyos and @schottkey on @Apartresearch work investigating Latent Adversarial Training (LAT) as a safety fine-tuning method.
The study compares LAT to other methods and analyzes its impact on refusal behavior encoding.
8/7 There's also a post about our research at lesswrong.com/posts/cF7TFw9F…
7/7 Curious to learn more? Check out our paper: arxiv.org/abs/2409.15019. Huge thanks to my awesome teammates and to the organising team at LASR Labs! #LASRLabs #AIResearch #MechanisticInterpretability #SAE
1
1
83
6/7 Key takeaways: The relationships between SAE latents play a role when composing synthetic activations. However, there are still missing ingredients for creating completely realistic activations out of SAE latents..
1
1
46
5/7 We proposed two new tests for "jump positions" and "activation plateaus". These could be useful for validating the utility of SAE latents and seeing whether they're aligned with model behavior
1
1
29
4/7 Interesting finding: Synthetic activations with a 0.42 (!) cosine similarity to reference activations performed best in our tests. Their "jump" behavior was most similar to real activations.
1
1
53
3/7 Our approach: We looked at how the model's output changes when moving from synthetic to real activations. We were particularly interested in where rapid changes occur or "jumps" (measured by L2 distance)
1
1
49
2/7 We investigated an interesting question: Do synthetic activations (composed of SAE latents) behave like real model-generated activations? And what happens when we interpolate between them?
1
1
46
1/7 Excited to share our recent project from LASR Labs! We investigated on the utility of SAE latents in language models. #MechanisticInterpretability #SAE Here's what we discovered: 🧠🔍
Nora retweeted
Excited to announce our Deep Learning Tuning Playbook, a writeup of tips & tricks we employ when designing DL experiments. We use these techniques to deploy numerous large-scale model improvements and hope formalizing them helps the community do the same! github.com/google-research/t…
Nora retweeted
📢 New course! Cats4AI🐱🤖
Learn category theory foundations from the lens of ML, grounded in concrete papers. Open to all!
Sign up: cats.for.ai
@andrewdudzik @bgavran3 @_joaogui1 @pimdehaan
+ fantastic speakers @math3ma @CollapsingPanda @david_i_spivak @TacoCohen
Nora retweeted
NLP Roadmap 2022 with free resources.
This is what you need to build real-world NLP Projects and a Good Foundation. A Thread 🧵👇



















