Historian and Author. Fellow of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain. Author of book series “Treasures of the Gupta Empire”.
Global citizen
Joined June 2009
- Tweets392
- Following5K
- Followers1.3K
- Likes4.6K
Pinned Tweet
The Book “Treasures of the Gupta Empire, 2nd Edition” (2024) Part I, is now available as a PDF download.
This will allow all the Scholars, Researchers and Students and everyone else to have access to the latest research on this amazing and beautiful History of Ancient India. The Hindi translation of the book is ongoing and I hope to have this available soon also.
It is also available via Internet Archive.
archive.org/details/treasure…
Please share this so everyone can have access:
academia.edu/resource/work/1…
Beautiful representation of Terracotta and Clay Sealings from Ancient India - the Skeletons represent detachment-Impermanence in Buddhist context:
Per Grok:
They are personal monastic seals prescribed by Buddhist Vinaya texts to encourage contemplation of impermanence and detachment from the body.
In the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya (and related texts), the Buddha permits two kinds of seals for monks:
•Saṃgha (community) seals for official monastic use: typically the Dharmacakra (Wheel of the Law) flanked by two deer, often with an inscription naming the monastery (as seen on many Nalanda examples: “Śrī-Nālandā-Mahāvihārīyārya-bhikṣu-saṅghasya”).
•Personal seals for individual monks: to be engraved with skulls or skeletal bones/figures. The explicit purpose is so that “those who see it may cultivate a sense of spiritual detachment” through contemplation of the impurity/foulness of the body (aśubha-bhāvanā), a standard Buddhist meditative practice to reduce attachment to the physical form.
The “mysterious skeletal figures with no inscription” in the Nalanda sealings match this description of personal seals. Unlike the official monastic seals, they lack long legends naming the saṃgha or a donor/village and instead show skeletal or skull-like forms as the main device. This practice is attested in the Vinaya rules that were current during Nalanda’s peak (roughly 5th–12th centuries CE).
These sealings (clay impressions from actual seals) were used for documents, property, or identification within the monastery. The skeletal motif served a dual practical and doctrinal function: identifying the owner while constantly reminding the monk (and anyone handling the sealed item) of the body’s impermanence.
Dussehra: why it looks different across India
Dussehra (Vijayadashami) falls in Ashvin (September–October), when the monsoon ends.
For centuries this was the season when roads dried and kings set out on military campaigns.
On this day rulers traditionally worshipped their weapons, horses and elephants, honoured the Shami tree, and crossed their borders to begin a campaign.
That ritual is called Seemollanghan, "crossing the boundary."
Puja: honouring the tools of your work
Ayudha Puja ("worship of weapons") grew out of that royal custom.
It is mainly celebrated in the South on Mahanavami, the ninth day. Today it covers far more than weapons: farmers honour ploughs, workers their machines, drivers their vehicles, and students their books. Each is cleaned, marked with turmeric and kumkum, and decorated with flowers. Many families rest their tools for that day and take them up again on Vijayadashami, a fresh start.
The idea is simple: the things that give us a living deserve gratitude.
Over time, popular stories became attached to the day:
•Rama's victory over Ravana, the main focus in Punjab and much of North India, with Ramlila and the burning of effigies.
•Durga's victory over Mahishasura, the main focus in Bengal, where the day closes Durga Puja.
•Arjuna retrieving his weapons from the Shami tree, from the Mahabharata.
Regions differ mainly because of who celebrated the festival and how:
•Gujarat centres the nine nights on the Goddess, with Garba, and Dussehra follows.
•Maharashtra keeps the old boundary-crossing custom and the exchange of leaves as "gold."
•The South inherited a royal state festival. The Vijayanagara kings held a grand nine-day Mahanavami, described by Portuguese visitors in the 1520s–30s.
Mysore's kings continued it from 1610, centred on Goddess Chamundeshwari. Ayudha Puja, Golu doll displays and Saraswati Puja (honouring learning) come from this tradition.
Dussehra was never a contest between Hindu sects. It is one autumn festival with a shared core, the victory of order over disorder.
Each region tells that story in its own way.
Image:
Gold coin of Maharajadhiraja Sri Samudragupta, holds a Javelin, turned and points down to the ground while performing the AyudhaPuja. 4th Century AD. Goddess Lakshmi seated on a throne on the reverse.
Brahmi Legend on obverse of the coin:
Samaraśatavitata vijayo jitaripurajito divam jayati
“The invincible (king) who
had won the victories on a hundred battlefields and conquered the enemies, wins the heavens.”
Sanjeev Kumar, FRASGB retweeted
Cornelius Vanderbilt owned one of every twenty dollars in America. He had more money than the U.S. Treasury. It is all gone.
The man who went looking for it is his own descendant. You already know his face. Anderson Cooper.
Cooper found that the greatest fortune the country ever built had vanished, and had been gone for decades. When Vanderbilt died in 1877 he left 100 million dollars and no trust to protect it. His heirs poured it into mansions, yachts, and European titles. One grandson threw a wedding worth millions and died penniless in 1915. In 1973, 120 of the descendants gathered for a reunion, and not one of them was a millionaire.
By the time Cooper's mother Gloria was born in 1924, the money only looked endless.
His verdict on the name he was born into is cold. As a boy he looked at the Vanderbilts, then at the Coopers who farmed through the Depression, and he picked the farmers. His exact words. I don't think anything good can come out of the Vanderbilt side.
He inherited almost nothing, and he calls it his luck. The richest family in America paid full tuition on one lesson so you could have it for free. A fortune with no structure around it is not wealth. It is a countdown.
He explains where all of it went in two minutes. The answer is nothing.
Sanjeev Kumar, FRASGB retweeted
The Roman Empire paid for Indian goods in gold, and a single hoard in southern India held over 8,000 of the coins.
The Kottayam hoard, north of Nelcynda, was probably deposited from a Roman vessel that foundered off the coast, and the latest coins were struck under Nero. More than 20 hoards from the reign of Augustus alone have turned up in the Tamil country, the Coimbatore Gap has produced more Roman coins than the rest of the subcontinent combined, and the Chera, Pandya and Chola kings minted coins imitating Roman portraits. Pliny put the annual outflow at 50 million sesterces. Kottayam, at about 800,000, is a small fraction of a single year.
The Roman Empire funded up to half its empire from tax on trade with India.
At the height of Rome’s power, the richest city in the western world ran a long, unbalanced trade account with a land its armies never reached. That was the Indian subcontinent. Pliny the Elder, who had governed provinces and knew what the mint produced, put the annual outflow at 50 million sesterces in bullion. The emperor Tiberius complained Roman wealth was passing to foreigners. Domitian built dedicated warehouses for pepper in the heart of the city. A single shipload, recorded in a surviving papyrus, was valued at close to 9 million sesterces. The historian @RaoulMcLaughlin has reckoned, on those numbers, that customs duties on Indian cargoes produced close to half the revenue needed to finance the whole empire. Two legions in Egypt held the customs house that made it work.
India sent pepper, ivory, gems, perfumes and medicines. Rome paid in bullion. The taxes on imports and exports produced the revenue that transformed the Roman elite and the empire itself.
Rome called the Mediterranean Our Sea. The Indian Ocean was economically far more consequential.
The fuller story is on my Substack, with the shipping records, the Tamil poems that describe Roman vessels from the Indian side, and the hoards of Roman gold still surfacing in southern India (link in replies below).
Sanjeev Kumar, FRASGB retweeted
The Roman Empire funded up to half its empire from tax on trade with India.
At the height of Rome’s power, the richest city in the western world ran a long, unbalanced trade account with a land its armies never reached. That was the Indian subcontinent. Pliny the Elder, who had governed provinces and knew what the mint produced, put the annual outflow at 50 million sesterces in bullion. The emperor Tiberius complained Roman wealth was passing to foreigners. Domitian built dedicated warehouses for pepper in the heart of the city. A single shipload, recorded in a surviving papyrus, was valued at close to 9 million sesterces. The historian @RaoulMcLaughlin has reckoned, on those numbers, that customs duties on Indian cargoes produced close to half the revenue needed to finance the whole empire. Two legions in Egypt held the customs house that made it work.
India sent pepper, ivory, gems, perfumes and medicines. Rome paid in bullion. The taxes on imports and exports produced the revenue that transformed the Roman elite and the empire itself.
Rome called the Mediterranean Our Sea. The Indian Ocean was economically far more consequential.
The fuller story is on my Substack, with the shipping records, the Tamil poems that describe Roman vessels from the Indian side, and the hoards of Roman gold still surfacing in southern India (link in replies below).
Sanjeev Kumar, FRASGB retweeted
Around 4600 BCE, there is an obscure culture on the western coast of the Black Sea in what is now Bulgaria.
A society called Varna. They had everything ...working copper, trading over long distances and burying certain people with levels of wealth that were massive.
Within a few centuries, it was gone.
The best evidence comes from the Varna Necropolis, discovered by accident in 1972. Archaeologists eventually uncovered hundreds of graves containing copper tools and weapons, flint, pottery, Mediterranean shell ornaments and thousands of pieces of worked gold.
About 3,000 gold objects weighing roughly 6.5 kilograms have been recovered from the site. It remains the earliest known large concentration of worked gold anywhere in the world.
Some graves contained almost nothing. Others contained huge amounts of wealth.
Remember this was around 6,500 years ago.
The cemetery appears to have been actively used for only about 120 to 260 years, roughly between 4600 and 4350 BCE.
That's it.
One of the richest and most technologically impressive societies in prehistoric Europe leaves behind this extraordinary cemetery, reaches a level of social organization rarely seen at the time, and then the archaeological record changes remarkably quickly.
We don't know what they called themselves.
We don't know their language.
We don't even know their religion.
They just disappeared!
This is in fact the greatest test of Human Behaviour and Experiment.
If you think we live in a simulation, imagine that there is a super intelligent force testing Humans with the ultimate test - will the power of Greed be greater than their evolutionary sense of their own survival as a species in the end.
Top Ai researchers and senior most Ai researchers sounding the alarm daily that they have created something that has the power to wipe out Humanity with the next decade. Or at the most, displace Humans as the most intelligent species on the planet.
Sanjeev Kumar, FRASGB retweeted
Dr Louisa Nicola revealed a simple tennis ball exercise that can boost your hand-eye coordination
Sanjeev Kumar, FRASGB retweeted
Karahantepe’de 11 bin yıllık benzersiz bir heykeli gün yüzüne çıkarttık!
Geleceğe Miras Projemiz kapsamında yürüttüğümüz 2026 yılı kazılarında, daha önce benzerine rastlanmayan bir üsluba sahip kompozit heykel bulduk.
Yaklaşık 11 bin yıl önce bırakıldığı yerden günümüze ulaşan 70 santimetre yüksekliğindeki heykel, leoparın sırtında oturan bir insanı betimliyor.
Bu özel eser; 3 metre çapında, zemini yassı taşlarla kaplanmış bir yapının duvarı boyunca uzanan sekinin üzerinde bulundu. İnsanlık tarihinin en erken dönemlerine ilişkin yeni soruların kapısını aralayan keşfin bilim dünyasında geniş yankı uyandıracağına inanıyorum.
Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğümüze, kazı heyetimize, bilim insanlarımıza ve sahada özveriyle çalışan tüm ekip arkadaşlarımıza teşekkür ediyorum.
Skandagupta and the Struggle for the Western Gupta Empire
The remarkable gold royal seal of Skandagupta, depicting the Kukkuṭa (rooster) confronting the Mahā-Śakti, acquires considerably greater historical significance when examined alongside Skandagupta’s exceptionally rare lead coinage from western India.
The shared iconography—rooster, Mahā-Śakti, peacock and three-arched hill—links these objects to the political and military circumstances surrounding Skandagupta’s emergence as the dominant Gupta prince in Malwa and Gujarat during the closing years of Kumāragupta I’s reign.
The political background is critical. Prabhāvatīgupta, the Gupta princess who exercised extraordinary influence within the Vākāṭaka kingdom, had maintained close relations between the two dynasties.
Following her death, placed in Treasures in AD 443, those relations deteriorated.
With Kumāragupta I aging, the question of succession again became politically charged.
The reconstruction advanced in Treasures places Ghaṭotkachagupta, son of Chandragupta II and therefore Skandagupta’s uncle, among the contenders for Gupta sovereignty. His exceedingly rare gold coinage is interpreted as evidence of this assertion of royal authority.
The dispute was not merely dynastic. Ghaṭotkachagupta was connected by marriage to the Vākāṭakas, and Pravarasena II had compelling familial reasons to support him.
The discussion in the Book reconstructs a Vākāṭaka–Ghaṭotkachagupta advance into Malwa, where the challengers were defeated by the young prince Skandagupta, who had been entrusted with restoring Gupta authority in the western territories.
This successful western campaign appears to have been fundamental to Skandagupta’s subsequent political ascendancy.
It is here that the numismatic evidence becomes especially important.
Skandagupta’s lead Rooster (Kukkuṭa) Type includes a dated Variety B carrying both his name, Śrī Skandaguptasya, and Gupta Era 130 (AD 449).
These coins demonstrate that Skandagupta was already issuing currency under his own name in the western Gupta territories substantially earlier than the traditional chronology that placed his accession around AD 455.
This discussion In the Book “Treasures of the Gupta Empire” shows us that the consolidation of Skandagupta’s authority was a process rather than a single accession event: while Kumāragupta I remained king, Skandagupta was already exercising substantial authority in the west.
The imagery provides a striking visual continuity. The rooster confronting the Mahā-Śakti on the lead coins reappears in monumental form upon Skandagupta’s gold seal.
Other lead issues combine the peacock with the three-arched hill, while the Mahā-Śakti itself belongs to the established iconographic vocabulary of Kārttikeya/Skanda.
At the same time, the three-arched hill had a much older western numismatic pedigree: it had already appeared on the coinage of the Western Kṣatrapas and subsequently entered Gupta issues produced after the conquest of their territories.
The epigraphic record gives this political reconstruction a further dimension.
The Bhitarī Stone Pillar Inscription portrays Skandagupta as the prince who steadied the “tottering Sovereignty of the House” and, after defeating his enemies, “established again the Sovereignty of the House (of Guptas)”.
Most evocatively, it compares his return to his grieving mother with Kṛṣṇa returning to Devakī after slaying his enemy. Treasures interprets this passage in conjunction with the Rāmtek Kevala Narasiṃha Temple inscription, which records the death of Ghaṭotkachagupta and Pravarasena II’s recovery of his widowed sister, as evidence for the violent termination of Ghaṭotkachagupta’s challenge.
(1 of 2)
🤖 Made with AI
(2 of 2)
The Junāgaḍh inscription, meanwhile, belongs to the western theatre in which Skandagupta’s power was established. It celebrates him as having rendered the serpent rulers who had raised their hoods in pride “devoid of poison.” Read alongside the dated western coinage, it reinforces the picture of a prince whose military success in Gujarat and Malwa preceded—and helped make possible—his eventual supremacy within the Gupta dynasty. Part I thru CGII Archer _Treasures of the Gupta Empire 2nd Edition India Print July 13 2024-2.pdf
Thus, the gold medallion seal should not be treated simply as an isolated masterpiece of Gupta metalwork. The seal, the dated lead coinage and the inscriptions together preserve different dimensions of the same historical transformation. The rooster and Mahā-Śakti proclaimed Skandagupta’s authority; the peacock and three-arched hill embedded that authority within the religious and western numismatic vocabulary of the period; and the date GE 130 (AD 449) anchors this political presence in time.
In this context, the magnificent gold seal becomes something more than an emblem of kingship: it is the monumental expression of an iconographic and political programme already visible on the small lead coins issued as Skandagupta fought to secure the western empire and ultimately the sovereignty of the Gupta house itself.
— Sanjeev Kumar, Treasures of the Gupta Empire, 2nd ed., especially pp. 7–8, 73, 118–119, 455–456.
Excellent work on Seals and Sealings of Ancient India. Congratulations to the authors, Collectors and the editorial team for getting this important catalogue published.
👏🏼👏🏼
Seals and sealings kept in the collection of Himanshu Garg, Agra, U.P.
This article by Vijay Kumar, Alok Ranjan and Aditya Kumar Agarwal is the collection has 351 seals and sealings; these have been arranged in the form of a catalogue in ..........
Link: ijarch.com/ija-vol-11-number…
An entire Herculaneum scroll has been read for the first time | Vesuvius Challenge. For almost 2,000 years, the carbonized library of Herculaneum has kept a cruel bargain: its scrolls survived the eruption of Mount Vesuvius, but too fragile.. scrollprize.org/firstscroll
This article beautifully captures the deep, often overlooked roots connecting the Scythian nomads of the Eurasian steppes to the very foundations of Indian civilization.
Through the lens of the ancient Scythian myth of golden objects (plough, yoke, axe, and cup) falling from the sky—a tale of divine kingship and the tripartite social order—it reveals striking parallels with the Vedic rājasūya ritual.
As scholar Mikhail Bukharin shows, these regalia mirror the sacred kit that consecrated a Vedic king, who himself embodied the priestly, warrior, and productive functions of society.
Far from distant barbarians, these nomadic Indo-Iranian peoples shared profound cultural and mythological DNA with the early Vedic world.
Later, as the Sakas (the Persian name for Scythians), branches of these same steppe nomads migrated into the northwest of the subcontinent, establishing powerful kingdoms, influencing art, coinage, administration, and warrior traditions.
They became integral to India’s historical fabric—ruling as satraps, facilitating trade, and blending into the evolving cultural landscape.
The piece elegantly bridges steppe nomadism with Indic kingship, showing how these mobile peoples were not outsiders but kin who helped shape India’s ancient destiny.
A compelling read that reframes a vital chapter of shared heritage.
New Substack: The Scythian myth of the golden regalia has a striking Vedic parallel. Mikhail Bukharin argues the objects mirror the kit used in the rājasūya, the rite that made a man king. Like the Vedic ruler, the Scythian king embodied every function of society in his own person.
Listen, Read and Subscribe for free. Link below:
open.substack.com/pub/mravin…
Ravinder Reddy highlights a striking ancient connection: the Ṛgveda describes the finest Soma—the drink that granted the gods immortality—coming from the mountains of Mūjavant in the northwest, near the Hindu Kush.
In the same region, Persian sources refer to a Scythian/Saka tribe as the Sakā haumavargā, or “haoma-pressers.”
Since Soma and haoma are the same sacred drink, this points to deep cultural links between Vedic India and the nomadic steppe peoples.
Check out his new Substack pieces on the Gods of the Scythians and The Golden Horsemen for more fascinating insights.
The Ṛgveda says the best soma, the drink that kept the gods deathless, came from a mountain called Mūjavant, which scholars place up in the northwest, around the Hindu Kush. The Persians knew a Scythian/Saka tribe in that same highland country and called them the haoma-pressers, the Sakā haumavargā. Soma and haoma are the same word.
My first 2 Substack pieces on Scythians/Sakas are live. Read, listen, and subscribe for free. Links below:
- The Gods of the Scythians open.substack.com/pub/mravin…
- The Golden Horsemen open.substack.com/pub/mravin…
Rāmagupta–Kāchagupta: The Forgotten King. (c. AD 378–383)
The story of Rāmagupta–Kāchagupta is one of the most important unresolved chapters in Gupta history, because it preserves the memory of a ruler who briefly stood at the center of imperial power and was then erased from the official record. For more than a century, scholars struggled with two names: Rāmagupta, known from copper coins and inscriptions, and Kāchagupta, known from gold coins. Neither name appears in the later official Gupta genealogies. The central question was whether they were separate rulers, relatives, rivals, or the same king.
The evidence presented here shows that Rāmagupta and Kāchagupta were one and the same ruler, active in the turbulent years following the death of Samudragupta I and immediately before the accession of Chandragupta II.
The first decisive breakthrough came in 1968, with the discovery of three Jain sculptures at Durjanpur near Vidisā. These sculptures, depicting Jain Tīrthaṅkara Candraprabha and Arhat Puṣpadanta, carry inscriptions in fourth-century AD palaeography. Their inscriptions state that the images were commissioned by Mahārājādhirāja Śrī Rāmagupta. This is crucial because it provides inscriptional evidence that Rāmagupta was not merely a literary figure, but a reigning king who bore the imperial title Mahārājādhirāja, “The Great King of Kings.”
Yet the numismatic record remained divided. Hundreds of tiny copper coins of Rāmagupta had been found, but no gold coins bearing the name Rāmagupta were known. Conversely, gold coins of Kāchagupta had been found in hoards together with coins of Chandragupta I, Samudragupta I, Chandragupta II, and later Gupta rulers, including the Tanda Hoard and the Ballia Hoard, but no copper coins of Kāchagupta had been found.
The early debate over Kāchagupta’s place in the Gupta dynasty centered on coins with the name “Kācha” in Brahmi under the king’s left arm on the obverse (front) of the gold coins.
These coins lacked the Garuḍadhvaja, the dynastic royal emblem of the Guptas, and instead showed the king holding the Chakradhvaja, a standard topped with a chakra. Because the Garuḍadhvaja signified official Gupta royal sanction on coins, seals, and inscriptions, earlier scholars questioned whether Kāchagupta was a recognized Gupta monarch. They were partially right, as at the time he issued these gold coins, Kācha had not yet assumed the Gupta Throne.
The 1946 discovery of the Bayāna Hoard changed this picture. Among the sixteen Kācha coins found there, fifteen belonged to a variety with the chakra standard. One unique coin, however, showed the addition of a Garuḍadhvaja on the obverse. Its reverse also introduced a new design: a goddess holding a diadem and a cornucopia. Weighing 7.74 g, this Variety B coin strongly indicated Kāchagupta’s legitimacy as a Gupta king because of the inclusion of the Garuḍadhvaja.
In the late 1990s, another variety emerged from an older collection, now known as Variety C. This coin resembled the Bayāna Hoard coin, including the Garuḍadhvaja, but showed a distinct reverse. The goddess held a lotus flower instead of a diadem. Both Varieties B and C, were produced by the royal mint, shared the same tamghā on the reverse. This shift from cornucopia to lotus marks an important iconographic development at the royal mint.
The decisive bridge between Rāmagupta and Kāchagupta came from two unique copper coins discovered from the Vidisā region, recovered among a large group of tiny copper coins of Rāmagupta.
The first coin showed Garuḍa on the obverse with outstretched wings. This type was common on coins of Rāmagupta, but the reverse legend was important because it gave the full name of the king: Rāmagupta. 1/4
🤖 Made with AI
The gold coins of Kāchagupta are unique within Gupta numismatics because they are the only Gupta coins showing the king holding a Chakradhvaja. A total of 129 coins of King Kāchagupta holding a Chakradhvaja are known so far. Their weight range is 6.98–7.8 g. The gold purity of coins without the Garuḍadhvaja ranges from 76.28% to 83.22%. Five Class II coins with the Garuḍadhvaja are known, and one of these, coin 256, has a gold purity of 85.44%, indicating a higher gold percentage in a royal-mint issue confirming a new king.
The legends also matter. The obverse legend, corrected by Gerald Browne from Altekar’s earlier reading, reads:
Kācho gām avajitya dyām karmabhir uttamair jayati
“Kācha, having vanquished the earth, conquers heaven through the highest deeds.”
The reverse legend reads:
Sarvarājocchhettā
“Exterminator of all Kings.”
Earlier scholars used this title to argue that Kāchagupta and Samudragupta I were the same king, because Sarvarājocchhettā is associated with Samudragupta I in Gupta inscriptions. But the chapter rejects that “all or nothing” theory. The same imperial titles—Parama bhāgavata, Parama bhaṭṭāraka, Parākramaḥ, Sarvarājocchhettā, Śrī Vikramaḥ, Vikramādityaḥ, Kramādityaḥ—were reused by different Gupta kings and cannot be treated as exclusive markers of a single monarch. The title Sarvarājocchhettā was also used for Chandragupta II in the Pune copper plates and the Rithpur copper plates of Prabhāvatīgupta.
The final tragedy comes through the later narrative preserved in the Sanskrit dramatic tradition. Rāmagupta is described as the elder brother of Chandragupta II.
According to the tradition preserved through Devīchandraguptam and Nāṭyadarpaṇa, Rāmagupta brought shame upon the Gupta dynasty by agreeing to surrender his wife to the Śaka king Rudrasiṃha III in exchange for peace. Chandragupta II was outraged, killed Rudrasiṃha III, took Rāmagupta’s wife, and then overthrew and killed Rāmagupta.
The chapter emphasizes that the anecdotal elements of this drama need not be accepted literally. Its historical importance is that its historical importance lies in preserving the memory of Rāmagupta as a Gupta ruler preceding Chandragupta II, and of a dynastic conflict that culminated in Chandragupta II’s accession to the throne.
The chronology also complicates the dramatic tale: the Śaka ruler, commonly identified as Rudrasiṃha III continued to rule until AD 415, as dates on silver coins issued by this king are dated Śaka era 337 / AD 415 and show that he continued to issue coins well past the date referenced in the plays, i.e.,this date falls well into the reign of Kumāragupta I, more than thirty-two years after the event was supposed to have taken place according to the play.
What remains secure is this: Rāmagupta–Kāchagupta ruled briefly in the years c. AD 378–383, during the transition between Samudragupta I and Chandragupta II. He issued copper coins in the Vidisā region, performed the Aśvamedha, assumed the name Kācha, issued gold coins as Kāchagupta, captured the royal mint, and finally proclaimed himself Mahārājādhirāja.
After his fall, Chandragupta II assumed the throne in AD 383 (see book pages 105-106 for a reevaluation of the date) and married Dhruvadevī, Rāmagupta’s wife. The official Gupta record then erased the names of Rāmagupta–Kāchagupta from the dynastic genealogy. The chapter frames this as history written by Chandragupta II: a false narrative propagated to justify fratricide and the seizure of the throne.
The Sañjān copper plates of the Rāṣṭrakūṭa king Amoghavarṣa I (c. AD 871) preserve a striking memory of the episode, referring to a Gupta ruler who, after killing his brother, seized both his kingdom and his wife.
3/4
🤖 Made with AI
Thus the truth survives not in the official genealogy, but in the evidence that could not be erased: the Jain statues from Durjanpur bearing inscriptions naming Mahārājādhirāja Śrī Rāmagupta, the copper coins of Rāmagupta, the Aśvamedha copper coin bearing both Kācha and Rāmagupta, and the gold coinage of Kāchagupta showing the progression from regional authority to royal-mint recognition and imperial proclamation.
The conclusion is clear: Rāmagupta and Kāchagupta were one and the same king — a Gupta emperor briefly enthroned, erased by Chandragupta II, and rediscovered through coins and inscriptions.
This is why the first line in my first book reads: History is written by the Victors.
Perhaps it should have been: History is not merely written by victors — it is often rewritten by them.
(For more up to date research on Gupta Era please use the link on my profile to download the book.)
4/4