Pinned Tweet
i was lucky enough to place on the shortlist for the 2020 #CWPrize with my story "Rabbit", which is now up for reading! and thank you to @Ruby_Solomon_ for being a #goodartfriend and your amazing pic! addastories.org/rabbit/
Looking to read some shortlisted #CWPrize stories before submitting this year, or simply looking for something good to read, the 2021 shortlist is now up on adda: bit.ly/3FucVU2
Illustration by Ruby Solomon
Help NZ Strippers Fight For Justice gofundme.com/f/help-nz-strip…
Samantha Lane Murphy retweeted
Yes! I am so passionate about our amazing Aotearoa New Zealand talent. You can check out my spreadsheet of published NZ spec fic novels here: docs.google.com/spreadsheets… And feel free to add your work if you're an #NZAuthor #ReadNZ #SpecFicNZ #NZSpecFic
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Samantha Lane Murphy retweeted
me: 01101001 00100000 01101100 01101111 01110110 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000
non-binary person: what
Samantha Lane Murphy retweeted
there IS a correct way to play dnd and only gay people know what that is
collective noun for a group of writers pitches: an anthology of, a mimosa of, a @PaperRoadPress of
Samantha Lane Murphy retweeted
remember, a first draft doesn’t have to be perfect! except for mine. mine must be flawless or I might as well quit. I am the only one this applies to.
🙏
If you haven't already, check out the short story "Reprise" by Samantha Lane Murphy (@samjamming) in @strangehorizons-a moving sci-fi story about recovery and things we wish we had said to those who have passed. #scifi #shortstories #WritingCommunity
strangehorizons.com/fiction/…
Samantha Lane Murphy retweeted
Our story for the week is Samantha Lane Murphy's "Reprise":
strangehorizons.com/fiction/…
huge honour to have my story, "Reprise", published in this issue by @strangehorizons and you may find it yonder: strangehorizons.com/fiction/…
Our first July issue is now live, and online for your perusal:
strangehorizons.com/issue/4-…
the "women" vs "people with uteruses" thing is so silly and bioessentialism all the way down, even if at least the latter is inclusive. but 'person who needs an abortion' pretty much does all the implicit heavylifting, no??















