Biochemist, biophysicist, 666 star general at the 77th, he/him.

There, see?
Joined January 2022
… you’re a flat earther, aren’t you?
1
66
That’s one way to admit you made it up…
2
59
What a load of delusional bullshit.
19
Your evidence for this being… a single Google search. Lovely.
1
15
Oh dear. You think that’s a description of an event, don’t you?
43
Dave ❄️🗿 retweeted
He'll be pitching an anti-shedding lotion and shampoo to McCullough next. Oh and I claim the IP on that, by the way.
1
2
256
By “adverse effects recorded for uninjected people”, do you mean any illness anyone might have after NOT being vaccinated?
63
That’s a protocol. Where’s your evidence? It should be pretty easy to run a RT-PCR on an unvaccinated individual’s blood sample and detect the vaccine mRNA.
119
Please explain how the mother’s Covid antibodies are not transmitted to the child, when other antibodies are
1
3
66
Dave ❄️🗿 retweeted
Reminder: Only live virus vaccines can shed. There is no way physically possible for mRNA vaccines to shed. I literally cannot happen in real life.
Replying to @Pharmaresistant
lol yep. The irony. Shedding is real.
58
14
175
12,809
Damn, you beat me to it!
2
19
Replying to @mbeisen
In every lab there's one person whose bench is permanently spotless and one who seems to be constructing a replica of the Eiffel tower from pipette tips.
87
Many people think that a scientific consensus is a large group of scientists who all agree that something is true. In reality, it’s a large body of scientific studies that all agree with and support each other. The agreement is a by-product of the consistent evidence.
Replying to @jonathanstea
Science isn't consensus, especially when you proport it to being the bee all of end all. Science questions everything, especially when there is a consensus.
35
69
5
316
13,973
Wow. You got it bad
8
564
Replying to @cultured_spice
That bad huh? I always say we look best in cargo shorts and old t shirts 😜
1
98
Magic. Or, you know, mutations. But I’m sure you think it’s magic.
7
Replying to @robertopaulos85
Nope. SpaceTIME is curved by massive objects. That curves the trajectories of neighbouring objects, which is equivalent to gravity. None of this particularly matters for the shape of the earth.
10