Replying to @bereancry1711 @Gutsick_Gibbon
That’s one way to admit you made it up…
Replying to @JoshuaB42069 @rejectthegreat1
What a load of delusional bullshit.
Replying to @rejectthegreat1 @JoshuaB42069
Your evidence for this being… a single Google search. Lovely.
Dave ❄️🗿 retweeted
Myocarditis risk significantly higher after COVID-19 infection vs. after a COVID-19 vaccine | American Heart Association newsroom.heart.org/news/myoc…
Replying to @EdmundKudzayi @sjs856
Oh dear. You think that’s a description of an event, don’t you?
Dave ❄️🗿 retweeted
He'll be pitching an anti-shedding lotion and shampoo to McCullough next.
Oh and I claim the IP on that, by the way.
By “adverse effects recorded for uninjected people”, do you mean any illness anyone might have after NOT being vaccinated?
Replying to @EdmundKudzayi @sjs856
That’s a protocol. Where’s your evidence? It should be pretty easy to run a RT-PCR on an unvaccinated individual’s blood sample and detect the vaccine mRNA.
Replying to @EdmundKudzayi @sjs856
Please explain how the mother’s Covid antibodies are not transmitted to the child, when other antibodies are
Dave ❄️🗿 retweeted
Reminder: Only live virus vaccines can shed. There is no way physically possible for mRNA vaccines to shed. I literally cannot happen in real life.
Replying to @mbeisen
In every lab there's one person whose bench is permanently spotless and one who seems to be constructing a replica of the Eiffel tower from pipette tips.
Dave ❄️🗿 retweeted
Many people think that a scientific consensus is a large group of scientists who all agree that something is true.
In reality, it’s a large body of scientific studies that all agree with and support each other. The agreement is a by-product of the consistent evidence.
Replying to @jonathanstea
Science isn't consensus, especially when you proport it to being the bee all of end all.
Science questions everything, especially when there is a consensus.
Replying to @cultured_spice
That bad huh?
I always say we look best in cargo shorts and old t shirts 😜
Replying to @robertopaulos85
Nope.
SpaceTIME is curved by massive objects. That curves the trajectories of neighbouring objects, which is equivalent to gravity.
None of this particularly matters for the shape of the earth.






