@rrwick

No longer active here. Find me on Bluesky: https://nitter.cf/t.co/1mPtWVlnli

Melbourne
Joined August 2013
This will be my last post here. I'm moving to Bluesky: bsky.app/profile/rrwick.bsky… Hope to see you there!
4
462
Do you make core genome alignments for phylogenomics? @monaltaouk and I explored how including sites with some missing data (a soft core) can improve analysis, especially for large datasets. microbiologyresearch.org/con… (1/4)
2
30
1
90
5,810
And the benefits grow with dataset size! A 100% strict core may work fine for small datasets (e.g. ~10 genomes) but is devastating for very large ones (e.g. 1000+ genomes). A 95% soft core works well across all dataset sizes. (3/4)
1
3
579
New year, new assemblies! I'm excited to announce Autocycler, my new tool for consensus assembly of long-read bacterial genomes! It's the successor to Trycycler, designed to be faster and less reliant on user intervention. Check it out: github.com/rrwick/Autocycler… (1/5)
5
117
3
259
15,742
However, Autocycler still allows users to manually intervene when they would like to. So it aims for the best of both worlds: either hands-off automated assemblies or hands-on curated assemblies, as the user sees fit. (4/5)
1
4
893
Autocycler is still new and evolving. I'll continue to improve it based on your feedback. A big thank you to the alpha testers who gave me feedback before this release! Give it a try and share your thoughts. (5/5)
1
9
834
Just had my first experience with CycloneSEQ data and shared my findings in this blog post: rrwick.github.io/2024/12/17/… How does CycloneSEQ compare to @nanopore? I looked at both read-level and consensus-level accuracy. Check it out!
1
9
1
35
1,903
Excited to share this preprint where we’ve used genomic analysis of >3000 genomes to study Klebsiella pneumoniae in a One Health perspective 🦠🔬👩‍💻#OneHealth #KLEBGAP #KlebClub @IrenLohr @DrKatHolt @NORKLEBNET
A genome-wide One Health study of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Norway reveals overlapping populations but few recent transmission events ... biorxiv.org/cgi/content/shor… #biorxiv_micrbio
2
23
1
67
6,823
Our OnION sequencing computer now has a little sibling: Spring OnION! Short post with some stats and benchmarks: rrwick.github.io/2024/08/16/…
4
8
93
4,945
I finally got around to testing HERRO (github.com/lbcb-sci/herro), the new @nanopore read correction algorithm which takes simplex ONT reads to PacBio-HiFi-level accuracy. I was impressed! Findings are on my blog in a two-part post: rrwick.github.io/2024/07/26/… rrwick.github.io/2024/07/31/…
3
75
3
226
20,434
How low can you go? Short-read polishing of Oxford Nanopore bacterial genome assemblies. Published #OpenAccess and fee-free in #MGen using a #PublishAndRead agreement: doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.00125…
9
24
4,534
It has been public for a while, but with #VoM2024 starting, today is as good as any to introduce our new tool phage genome annotation tool Phold. Phold uses structural homology to assign functions to phage proteins (1/n)
1
62
6
209
26,207
I am excited to win a CZI EOSS grant! This is the first grant I have ever won after 20+ years in science. It feels wonderful to finally be funded for my open-source contributions. With @wytamma we will deliver the next generation of my popular Snippy software! 🦘🦘🦘 – at Melbourne, Victoria
Open source tools are crucial for biomedical research. We're collaborating with @KavliFoundation + @Wellcometrust to support developers & maintainers of critical #OpenSource projects, promoting innovation & community engagement in the field. More ▶️ czi.co/3zjN56l
40
49
5
353
23,409
New blog post: rrwick.github.io/2024/06/11/… ONT-only bacterial assemblies are much better than they were only a couple of years ago. Often <10 errors in the whole genome. Does that mean that less short-read sequencing is required for polishing? See my post for the answer! (1/4)
2
55
1
152
17,271
The paper also introduces George's tool Pypolca: github.com/gbouras13/pypolca This is a reimplementation of the POLCA polisher (by @AlekseyZimin5) that is easier to install and run. Pypolca also has some new options (e.g. --careful) which give it more flexibility than POLCA. (3/4)
1
12
1,018
I'm a big fan of Pypolca and use it a lot. If you had to pick one and only one tool for short-read polishing of ONT bacterial genome assemblies, it should be Pypolca! (4/4)
16
961