Rohun Ati retweeted
We've been heads down building @Locunity to provide mission-critical intelligence for top F500 government affairs teams, newsrooms, and advocacy organizations.
Reliability is non-negotiable for us. We monitor hundreds of government commissions across the United States and process 31,000 jobs a month and 4.5TB of video and documents a week. Render makes it easy to isolate services, instrument them properly, and root cause a failed job in minutes.
Thanks @render (cc @anuraggoel) for featuring our work and powering the next generation of infrastructure to scale our democracy! 🚀
Locunity monitors 200 government commissions across the US. 31,000 processing jobs a month. Only two people.
A failed job here means wrong intelligence landing in a Fortune 50 inbox.
"I'm willing to invest in reliability. That's non-negotiable," says Dev Iyer, Locunity's CTO.
On Render, the pipeline just runs. Read how Locunity's two-person team keeps democracy covered: render.com/customers/locunit…
Check out our first blog post on how the best owners in TX managed their portfolios of grid-scale battery projects: blog.dartboardenergy.com/the…
Dartboard (@dartboardenergy) is an AI analyst for electricity markets. Dartboard helps grid-scale battery owners stay compliant, and tells them how to charge and discharge to maximize their revenue.
ycombinator.com/launches/MoJ…
Congrats on the launch, @rohunati and Bhasi!
1
8
451
Rohun Ati retweeted
Dartboard (@dartboardenergy) is an AI analyst for electricity markets. Dartboard helps grid-scale battery owners stay compliant, and tells them how to charge and discharge to maximize their revenue.
ycombinator.com/launches/MoJ…
Congrats on the launch, @rohunati and Bhasi!
We just launched a free AI answer engine for ERCOT.
Digging through ERCOT protocol docs sucks —thousands of documents, scattered everywhere. We built an AI answer engine that finds what you need linked to the source docs.
Try now (10 free queries/day): ai.dartboardenergy.com
1
2
118
Check out the post to learn more about our Frontier analysis! blog.dartboardenergy.com/the…
4
94
This is especially apparent with cricket. Despite being the national obsession, India can’t organize itself into any cricket success. The lack of teamwork and self-discipline is on full display at ICC Cricket World Cup where India’s been absolutely atrocious. A real shame.
Indians are not organized. It’s not part of the culture. Indians never had mandatory military service, people aren’t able to self discipline, the sports activities in schools is minimal, teamwork doesn’t come naturally and the general environment is always chaos.
6
381
New post - I wrote about why utility providers are like mafia fiefdoms, why we’re all eating the utility’s costs, how to keep the power on during the next natural disaster, and more. rohunati.substack.com/p/the-…
1
341
Considering we learned @SBF_FTX managed to run his company for years w zero accounting, no board, and such little record keeping they didn’t even know who was actually employed at @FTX_Official, I think there’s a small chance @elonmusk can keep the lights on for a couple months
1
Please for the love of god, do not make a movie about @FTX_Official / @SBF_FTX. It needs to be an 8-episode TV series (at least), this shit is too juicy
In the Levitt case, the court didn’t consider the parody account’s bio when they decided in favor of the parody account. But they did consider an old tweet that said “this is a parody account. You can find the real Todd [here]”.
1
The paper also says that twitter’s official parody policy requires accounts to say something to indicate parody, like putting “this is a parody” in the bio (this paper’s from 2020). Dunno if that's still true, but didn't know that.
1
The author of this paper argues that this “lack of context makes Twitter parody authors particularly vulnerable to defamation liability” (see the Todd Levitt case).
1
This paper notes that Twitter is unique in that tweets have less context — 280 characters in a timeline where surrounding tweets don’t offer context — than print media.
1
The Onion argues in their petition that parody functions by tricking people into thinking it’s real. Sure, but it’s also true that many parody authors use context clues to signal that their work is parody.
1
Some courts have also questioned how much context surrounding a tweet is enough to determine if something’s defamatory and whether the “reasonable reader” standard should be different for Twitter because it’s harder to figure out what’s true online.
1
But I think the case law is maybe a little more undecided when it comes to tweets? This paper notes that some courts have mulled whether online readers should be held to a different “reasonable reader” standard than those in print media. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.…
1