the universe is mental //

Europe
Joined January 2022
xRobert retweeted
What's next will take Hyperliquid from undisputed winner of perps, to most exciting place to do anything, and everything; onchain. e/acc
A New Era for Hyperliquid, November 9th. See you on Elysium mainnet. e/acc
41
17
4
220
89,027
time to ascend into a new world. this is +EV for the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem and I believe that every $HYPE maxi should be giga bullish on this launch. you can't become the blockchain that houses all finance without the technological capabilities to handle all the demand the financial world throws at you. unfortunately, HyperEVM in its current form is not able to do this, and this is where Elysium will play the most important role. for the first time, you're getting access to the entire book state of the biggest on-chain perpetual exchange while having incredible speed and high block capacity. but I think the bigger unlock is not simply making existing DeFi applications faster. it's making entirely new applications economically viable. once builders can continuously read HyperCore state, perform more complex computation around it and interact back with HyperCore without treating computation as a scarce resource, the design space expands massively. automated hedging vaults, dynamic liquidity management, on-chain structured products, real-time risk engines, funding-rate strategies and applications we probably don't even have names for yet suddenly start making much more sense. HyperCore becomes the financial engine, while Elysium becomes the programmable layer around it. this is, in my opinion, what will allow smart builders to make new on-chain primitives available, extending the features of what HyperCore alone could offer. while Elysium sees the first inflow of protocols on its testnet, I believe that the actual products which will profit from this new opportunity have not yet been announced or even built. time to build a utopian financial world. e/acc
A New Era for Hyperliquid, November 9th. See you on Elysium mainnet. e/acc
3
1
14
521
an example of dApps redefining how on-chain finance works would be @aegis_hedge and @Pindar_finance. very hyped about these primitives.
3
40
spot on advice imo. i'm personally coming after a long head-wrecking period where I developed extreme market PTSD, an insanely short attention span due to "always clicking" habits from the 2024-2025 period, and mental burnout where I couldn't hold a token for more than 2 days without always being worried. funny enough, developing a constant pessimistic outlook on the markets helped me preserve a big chunk of my capital in the bear market, but it also left me sidelined in a lot of good plays which followed after, and this is again something that wrecks your head. you can spot a good trade, you know it's going to do well, but you don't have the mental capacity to take it and be patient. i'm totally aligned on the idea that the majors will not give you the asymmetrical opportunity that you are looking to get in this current market. yes, even going for revenue-generating protocols might not be the best bet since most of them are currently priced in at speculative future revenue. (yep, there are still diamonds in the mud if you can find them). i believe that you need to become a bit contrarian, look beyond what's hot in the market at the moment and try to speculate on the potential growth of a product or narrative for the next period while it is still sitting at comfortable price levels or, as @koolkrypto223 mentioned, protocols with upcoming catalysts able to spark a round of momentum for them. to me, it feels like everyone is running after the same protocols and all the bags are looking pretty much the same. the small on-chain cabal turned into mega-wealthy individuals who built their own cabal and, due to their size, they need to push unicorns in order to exit safely. not really my cup of tea, although it can be profitable for some. it feels like the edge in the current market is to actually develop enough patience; you're trading against a majority of individuals who are totally burned out, with short attention spans, and who are not able to hold for more than a few days. size accordingly and leave yourself enough room for errors, as going with too much size will have a negative impact on your ability to stomach a bigger drawdown if the market continues to behave funny. become an optimist, even if you're looking retarded sometimes. your luck surface grows exponentially when you choose to believe in something rather than being cynical at all times (although learn to adapt and switch between those two mental states).
I'm way less concerned about whether we're a little higher or lower in the next few weeks than where all the value will flow in the next few months. I can stomach a dip to $75k on $BTC and 20%+ lower on alts. I can't stomach being sidelined for the on chain finance/tokeknization trend nearly a decade in the making. You're not going to 10x your portfolio selling $BTC at $81k and buying $75k or buying $81k and selling $85k. Nobody has extreme macro edge here; we live in unpredictable, volatile, crazy times. If the vocal bears end up right, they'll have been sidelined since summer anyway and if the overlevered bulls are right, they'll still blow up eventually. My only actionable advice is to shrink your bet sizing a little to take the volatility into account, eliminate the bloat and levered beta from your portfolio where you have no edge, and heavily concentrate into high conviction, idiosyncratic bets with near term catalysts. For me that looks like sizing down $BTC and even $HYPE exposure in favour of kinetiq:native for the upcoming Elysium launch, $AERO for the upcoming Aero multi-chain expansion, and $DRV for on chain options TAM expansion. Maybe for you it's $PRL and $NEAR. Very unpopular take, but $ZEC and $HYPE currently trade more like majors and levered beta than "idiosyncratic bets with near term catalysts that you have edge on". Doesn't make them bad long term investments at all, just don't feel the need to be overweight them at this time when they lack asymmetry. My example here would be if we're risk off, $HYPE could be $60 by EOY, and $100 if we're risk on. Pretty symmetric. kinetiq:native could be $0.15 if we're risk off, but it could be 5-10x higher if Elysium goes well. We want alts that behave like OTM calls, not 1.5x levered perps. TLDR: Figure out where the next $1trn of value will flow on chain, place your bets (sized to survive), and let the macro LARPs chop each other up. The correctness of your allocations will more heavily dictate your 2027 performance than your current exposure level.
5
342
xRobert retweeted
for any large position you take in your portfolio you should know more about that project than 99% of everyone else This is a fairly durable edge to have in crypto because most people simply do not do the work I take this idea of "being in the top 1%" and apply it to basically any new idea, niche, sector or project that im researching. I usually dont allocate any capital but the process of this compounds you can imagine that after a few months (or years) of doing this you start to have an insanely good understanding of a wide variety of topics in crypto. This "map" that you build out eventually becomes your edge in the space so my $.02 is to have a goal of becoming the top 1% in understanding any area of crypto that you are interested in. It will pay dividends forever
20
46
6
595
39,521
xRobert retweeted
Big if true Since true, big e/acc
Thoughts on the upcoming Elysium launch: As an absolute $HYPE maxi over an extended timeframe, it recently became clear that (in what is the most ironic possible outcome) CT's obsession with a cashflow/security valuation framework has become self-defeating. Since the conception of the cryptoeconomy, the dominating valuation framework has rested on some ill-defined network metrics (e.g., metcalfe's law) while cashflow was reserved as very much secondary, or non-existent. In the meantime, the vast majority of crypto participants were actively fighting the security status of cryptoassets while under fire from the Gensler-era SEC, which suggested the cashflow/DCF-style modeling as erroneous, and decisively so when the SEC determined cryptoassets as emphatically NOT securities. What's surprising about the canonical hype valuation framework is that it flies in the face of everything this space fought so hard to overcome, and very specifically effects arguably the best product to ever emerge from the cryptoeconomy. I think that it's because the mind virus around cashflow has muddied the fact that hyperliquid is not a security, and in fact contains exactly the network features that ETH, SOL, ZEC, etcetera, possess, and from which their fair market valuations profit tremendously (and appropriately). So back to @Kinetiq_xyz and @Enter_Elysium: if scaling the network component of hyperliquid can make more obvious this trait of hyperliquid, then the first thing that happens is that the network effects and corresponding fair market value explode, as we've seen in the past. On top of that, if the bottom line is accretive to hyperliquid, then not only does hype gain from the network effect/speculative premium, but also a genuine economic force supporting the ecosystem. That could be huge.
7
7
1
118
7,624
xRobert retweeted
Thoughts on the upcoming Elysium launch: As an absolute $HYPE maxi over an extended timeframe, it recently became clear that (in what is the most ironic possible outcome) CT's obsession with a cashflow/security valuation framework has become self-defeating. Since the conception of the cryptoeconomy, the dominating valuation framework has rested on some ill-defined network metrics (e.g., metcalfe's law) while cashflow was reserved as very much secondary, or non-existent. In the meantime, the vast majority of crypto participants were actively fighting the security status of cryptoassets while under fire from the Gensler-era SEC, which suggested the cashflow/DCF-style modeling as erroneous, and decisively so when the SEC determined cryptoassets as emphatically NOT securities. What's surprising about the canonical hype valuation framework is that it flies in the face of everything this space fought so hard to overcome, and very specifically effects arguably the best product to ever emerge from the cryptoeconomy. I think that it's because the mind virus around cashflow has muddied the fact that hyperliquid is not a security, and in fact contains exactly the network features that ETH, SOL, ZEC, etcetera, possess, and from which their fair market valuations profit tremendously (and appropriately). So back to @Kinetiq_xyz and @Enter_Elysium: if scaling the network component of hyperliquid can make more obvious this trait of hyperliquid, then the first thing that happens is that the network effects and corresponding fair market value explode, as we've seen in the past. On top of that, if the bottom line is accretive to hyperliquid, then not only does hype gain from the network effect/speculative premium, but also a genuine economic force supporting the ecosystem. That could be huge.
23
8
5
108
13,877
quite sure Hypercall deserves more attention.
$SYN = Hypercall: is an options exchange. On Oct 15 it did $72.4M in perp volume on Hyperliquid. That's more than MetaMask ($63.5M), Insilico ($50.7M), Liquid ($36.6M) and Axiom ($15.2M). Options hedges settling on $HYPE rails. $SYN is building the trifecta @SynapseProtocol
6
523
my conviction on @Kinetiq_xyz is purely a bet on @0xOmnia and the team delivering a pristine experience with @Enter_Elysium. the progress so far is quite satisfying. there's a wave of protocols steering the ship towards the ecosystem. no big protocols yet, but I feel that's the beauty of it. maybe a bit weird, but if we're looking into mythology, Elysium is the place of absolute peace, free from the struggles of the normal world. besides the struggles of HyperEVM that the Kinetiq team fixes with the launch of Elysium, there's another important aspect that I think will make sense in the grand scheme of things. any chain that launches goes through these phases of cannibalization and economic parasitism. all the protocols launching in that specific ecosystem have a single motivation: compete for users and liquidity, rise to the top and create the most value for your token. there's nothing wrong with this per se, but it is why PvE turns into PvP so quickly, as the resources on any chain will eventually become finite. let's not even touch on the vast number of L2s which give crumbs back to the actual L1 as they achieve structural decoupling. Elysium seems to be designed around the exact opposite idea. instead of creating another sovereign economy that slowly decouples from the layer underneath it, its success is still structurally tied to the success of Hyperliquid. $HYPE remains the native gas asset. applications on Elysium are meant to interact with HyperCore liquidity rather than recreate it somewhere else. more activity on Elysium can therefore translate into more market making, arbitrage, hedging and ultimately more volume flowing through HyperCore. the L2 doesn't need Hyperliquid to lose for Elysium to win. quite the opposite. if Elysium becomes a better execution environment for applications that simply cannot operate efficiently on HyperEVM today, it expands the surface area of what can be built around Hyperliquid while keeping the economic gravity centred around the same ecosystem. and this simple reflexivity is also reaching other builders, the ones which are not trying to compete purely in their own interest on Elysium, but actually the ones giving back to the Elysium ecosystem and the Kinetiq community. it's through protocols like @AscendLaunch, @NestExchange or @MontraXYZ, which have already announced that they will use part of their fees to buy back kinetiq:native tokens and burn them, in a similar process to what the Hyperliquid Foundation is doing. and imagine if you get 10-20 protocols doing the same, working together to push the chain further. what will this attract in the end? a stronger community, more activity, more interest from developers, making Elysium a more attractive place to launch your protocol and work together to build something great. simply put, a high-throughput utopian world. i strongly believe we are about to see a new standard being set for how any ecosystem should operate and how the force and alignment of the builders inside the ecosystem can create a halo effect. e/acc
23
19
3
114
8,096
It’s not delusional to say @Enter_Elysium will be the biggest launch on @HyperliquidX this year. mainnet is getting closer. Excited to see what @Enter_Elysium brings to the ecosystem. E/acc.
9
4
43
875
xRobert retweeted
What would be possible if you took the most performant orderbook tech stack onchain and built the composable, general purpose layer of its dreams Quite a lot it seems e/acc
A New Era for Hyperliquid. e/acc
22
11
142
3,893
just on Elysium.
Speculate goes live on @Enter_Elysium mainnet from day 1. The consumer gateway to Hyperliquid: prediction markets and TCG pack rips, for onchain speculators. Value-accretive all the way down: at launch, 100% of our Elysium fee share goes back to users. Don’t hesitate, Speculate.today
1
1
320
Alright, things are getting interesting for @Enter_Elysium. What we've got? - @AscendLaunch - @NestExchange - @MontraXYZ - @eloscapeHQ Most likely to launch on Elysium: - @pear_protocol - @SynapseProtocol - @papertrade_xyz Must be nice knowing that a lot of kinetiq:native is going to get burned.
🤖 Made with AI
1
16
553
xRobert retweeted
Eloscape. Value consolidation on Elysium.
103
36
17
352
33,136
xRobert retweeted
Montra is thrilled to announce the community launchpad for the @Enter_Elysium ecosystem. Following a comprehensive research program on different launchpad models – those broken and those not – we believe we’ve come up with what will become the de facto all-purpose launchpad model for the next generation of cryptoassets ICOing on Elysium and accruing value all the way through the hyperliquid ecosystem. As we approach Elysium mainnet launch, Montra will reveal its features piecewise, culminating in a litepaper containing all things revealed and the results of our research, presented the day before launch. Our first announcement is the Montra economic stimulus package, consisting of two parts (details to follow): 1) a fixed $100,000 stimulus dedicated to the most competitive builders ICOing on Montra 2) an engagement-based airdrop to stimulate the montra-elysium ecosystem (let’s break records here)
64
13
7
164
14,335
xRobert retweeted
One of my biggest takeaways from TOKEN2049 Singapore is that, even among the most sophisticated Hyperliquid users and holders, very few understand what precompiles are or how powerful this technology really is. And of course, most don’t realize that products like Papertrade are only possible thanks to precompiles. To put it simply: imagine if BNB Chain were connected onchain to Binance, or Base to Coinbase, allowing smart contracts to transfer assets and read exchange data directly onchain. That would be huge, right? Well, HyperEVM already does this with HyperCore. However, its current precompiles expose only a limited amount of data, and writing to HyperCore is still slow. @Enter_Elysium is fixing this by rebuilding the precompile layer from scratch, exposing significantly more HyperCore data and enabling much faster writes than HyperEVM. If you’ve got any crazy ideas for what to build with this tech on Elysium, hit me up.
31
22
5
217
16,375
Very insightful read on Elysium, everyone should have a look. While I think it will take some serious effort and time to reach Base level (or maybe not, who knows), it's certain that the upcoming period for kinetiq:native it's going to be interesting. There's one thing we shouldn't omit here: we see protocols being extremely aligned on the tokenomics side. @AscendLaunch commits 50% of its revenue to buy KNTQ (1% trading fees on launched tokens -- this could go pretty crazy). @NestExchange commits 70% of its fees towards buying KNTQ (they take 10% swap fees -- only Elysium pools btw). What about @pear_protocol? What about @SynapseProtocol? What about @delpho_labs? And what about many others? The alignment of this community will be a beautiful thing.
1/ Hyperliquid generated $716M in revenue over the last 12 months and is growing rapidly. One protocol runs the largest liquid-staking token on the chain, runs a perp/spot exchange on top of it, and plans to launch Hyperliquid's first L2. A thread on $KNTQ 🧵
2
1
11
433
I'm confident to say here that Elysium will quickly become the programmable money layer of the Hyperliquid Eco. HyperEVM computational bottleneck is the main reason more exquisite dApps are not building on top of it, despite the incredible growth of HyperCore. What's the issue? 1. The Gas Limit Problem The 3M limit of gas per small block won't attract any dApps that requiers high frequency state update. Yep, you attract DeFi primitives, but not more optimized and sophisticated protocols. 2. High Demand = Higher Transaction Cost More activity on HyperEVM results in way higher gas fees than necessary as it follows the Ethereum style gas concept. If users, protocols, etc are fighting for block space it creates a real demand problem and it's forcing them to pay more for gas, which creates UX issue and also eats away the revenue of a protocol (see @blurr convo with @notthreadguy to understand why high gas fees is a big problem for protocols/users on HyperEVM). 3. Congestion = Delayed Transactions More demand → fuller blocks → higher gas → slower and less predictable transaction inclusion. That's definitely a killer for dApps such as a PropAMM, where prices need to be updated continuously and the protocol has to react to market conditions in near real time. If every state update has to compete for scarce blockspace, the protocol either pays more to guarantee execution or accepts slower updates and worse pricing accuracy. At that point, congestion doesn't just become a UX issue. It starts directly affecting the efficiency, competitiveness and profitability of the application itself. The main benefit of Elysium is that it moves the heavy computation away from HyperEVM, while still keeping applications connected to Hyperliquid’s liquidity and market state. In practical terms: 1. Higher Execution Capability Elysium gives applications significantly more room for computation, so protocols that require constant state updates are no longer constrained by HyperEVM's limited fast-block capacity. They are targeting around 300M gas/second of execution throughput. For applications such as PropAMMs, automated market makers, lending protocols or complex vaults, this means substantially more application logic can be executed continuously without competing for such a small amount of blockspace. 2. Much Faster State Updates 5-10x faster than HyperEVM with 100–200ms block times. Interesting here is that application could theoretically receive several execution opportunities within the same period in which HyperEVM produces a single small block. 3. Closer Integration With HyperCore I think this might give Elysium one of the cleanest advantages over other L2s. Instead of building in isolation, applications on Elysium can be built directly around HyperCore, one of the deepest and most active onchain trading environments in crypto. Developers can use HyperCore data such as: → live prices → order-book depth → bids and asks → funding rates → open interest → balances and positions Then Elysium handles the heavy computation, application logic and rapid state updates around that data. To put it simply, I believe that Elysium can become the place where HyperCore’s liquidity, positions and market data are transformed into completely new financial products. That is why I think the real opportunity is not simply “faster execution.” It is giving developers a high-performance programmable layer directly on top of one of the strongest liquidity engines in crypto. And of course, I strongly believe that kinetiq:native will be positioned extremely well to acquire value in the grand scheme of things as the revenue could grow considerably if the things will heat up properly. I think it's time for the HL eco to have their on-chain moment and spark some interest from the community not only for the perps experience, but actual degen stuff. Regarding team, @0xOmnia showed insane builder skills, has already products to be deployed on chain and I do have a feeling they have their plan set just right for the launch. Anyway, you may want to keep an eye on this launch.
The only value accretive L2. General-purpose for @HyperliquidX. Now live on testnet.
1
7
670
my god i have been locked in here like everybody else. let me out
139
24
6
305
64,728