ai agents @ambr_io / ex. investment & research @ambergroup_io

opinions my own
Joined May 2022
varun showing the inner workings of our industry
21
10
3
589
63,736
EON IV. T–48H.
22
50
8
180
7,724
getting quite bullish internet monies. debasement from current debt situation + ai ponzu bailout = btc flows but quantum is the other side which is going to let other SoV's work as a hedge to btc. 2027 is a big money year for the coins imo.
14
10
6
194
16,064
We’re building the ultimate foundation for digital money, all based on Proofs. Has the research been daunting? Yes. Has it been risky? Also yes. But that’s what Proof of Work is, taking the risks, doing the work, and letting the chips fall where they may.
15
35
1
178
5,789
rob retweeted
Replying to @andyyy
We’ve been building @Nockchain since 2023, launched $NOCK in mid-2025. Hard-capped supply, no pre-mine, Proof-based money. Programmability, Privacy, and Proof of Useful Work. All enabled by ZKPs.
3
11
101
1,212
what i imagine its like to get investment advice from people in person at Token2049
7
1
1
55
1,562
amazing line of thinking but unfortunately its the wrong coin for that narrative i understand its a trade via perps. w/e but i truly think finding the correct coin in this narrative is more than a trade. its quite literally what eth is to btc. generational spot hold
13
29
2,881
safetrade will flip binance mindshare
13
4
44
2,029
safetrade should launch a coin
2
3
330
rob retweeted
Feel free to worry about whether we can execute on our vision. But you’re doing a great job of highlighting what @Nockchain’s vision is. By focusing on building up the foundation, a no pre-mine PoW chain that’s ZK-native, all of those features fall out naturally. $NOCK is compute-backed money. It will be programmable. It will be private. All of those are features that come from Proofs.
5
7
2
71
2,980
rob retweeted
Replying to @brezshares
Is the $NOCK pivot in the room with us right now? This is a pre-launch talk I gave in 2023. Proof of Useful Work. Privacy. Programmability. All built on Zero Knowledge Proofs. That was @Nockchain at inception, and that’s @Nockchain now. I get that your fragile narrative needs some way to spin anyone else in the Proof of Useful Work space negatively, but there’s no need to lie or make things up. We have a different focus from your favorite bag, and have been aiming for Proof of Useful Work before anyone else. Multiple coins exist in the world, and that’s okay. youtu.be/TlZGbF8wr8o?si=CS5j…
6
15
4
86
10,303
rob retweeted
Moneyness is an emergent property. Money is a Schelling point for value storage, exchange, and accounting. A system of coinage may achieve Moneyness if a growing network of people use it to store, exchange, and account for a stable or increasing amount of value over time. Storing value requires credible security. Exchanging value benefits from speed, ease, and flexibility. Accounting benefits from neutral immutability and lindyness. Digital money has some key benefits: neutral security can be proven, transfer can occur globally and quickly, and smart contracts can provide flexible, programmable constructs for interacting with value. Digital coins aiming at achieving Moneyness have converged to two primary shapes: - PoW, hard-capped supply coins with no pre-mine - PoS, pre-mined coins with flexible supply, inflation with burn mechanics to offset Moneyness is built up over time by a network of people using a coin; it isn’t achieved overnight. I strongly believe that PoW-shaped networks are the best candidates for global acceptance as Money. I began working on $NOCK back in 2023. I modeled the @Nockchain design after my good friend (Akis Kattis)’s 2020 research paper called Proof of Necessary Work, which imagined a PoUW network built on top of Zero Knowledge Proofs. Our team launched @Nockchain with no pre-mine in May of 2025, and we quickly became the largest ZK-proving network in the world (though the proofs being generated are not yet used by the network). We’re moving quickly toward privacy and programmability, all built on the same Proofs that secure the network. This summer we launched our AI Compute Network, which has 25 ExaMAC/s of compute and is presently merge-mining ~55% of Pearl blocks. We’re continuing research on making the AI Compute Network into useful verifiable inference. I’m happy to see more teams joining the Proof of Useful Work space. It’s good for the future of crypto for attention to be moving toward this important area of research. The question of Moneyness is a long game and will play out over time. Really, these economic experiments will be proven out through distribution over the course of years and decades.
I think trying to do all those things at once is exactly why it’s not money, programmability & complexity is -EV for money
11
21
1
98
10,015
wake up.
15
13
63
1,390
Replying to @tulipking
The xmr/zec argument makes no sense to me they are both ~10B+ market cap assets and both have been live/tradable for many years. I have bought some pearl, that said I’m more bullish on nock and using pearl as a hedge on my nock bag. These things will move violently (and in both directions) way too early to tell who wins in the end. That said, I like @loganallc vision and relentless work ethic. I actually think you are completely wrong that they won’t trade well alongside each other. (Maybe not in the same daily candles) but nock pulled a 5x off the lows while pearl was chopping 2 weeks ago, and now pearl is ripping w nock chopping etc. There is very little liquidity for both coins rn and I expect them both to continue to re-rate higher alongside each other. Competition is good. Also for your xmr/zec example, for many years it looked like xmr was the winner of privacy. So if pearl has a higher mcap now who tf cares. This is a multi-cycle play, if we are correct on the thesis. FWIW I agree that Zec has rewritten the rules of crypto investing and investing in crypto as money is imo, one the ways to truly outperform this cycle. Lastly, I respect pearl holders being on the front line of PoUW as an investable category. Anyways, Nock to multi billions. Cheers
3
5
4
40
5,281
rob retweeted
I'd do a pod with @tulipking, happy to chat on the base:0x9b5e262cf9bb04869ab40b19af91d2dc85761722 thesis
8
4
3
55
7,604
when i first joined amber's vc team, i used to overly care about the "tech". i would get so involved in it, akin to someone caring about rare traits on a nft or something. i think any other vc analyst would agree if they ever bull posted the "modular chain thesis". i had the opportunity to watch a lot of projects launch. their pre-tge plans, and how it played out post-tge. most project's token performance did not live up to expectations. its not that the tech was bad, it was that the token was set up to fail due to predatory token allocations. however if you purely optimized for the tech and not the token dynamics, you lost! right now to me, only 2 things matter. proof of work coins and memecoins. both can truly be fair, with no predatory supply overhang. however, both can also be unfair. trenchers know this when a coin is bundled. i think the same is true for proof of work, you always need to ask yourself is this game im playing fair? when i see a project that does it "right", or atleast, what i would do myself if i launched a coin, i get interested.
17
2
73
3,315
study how tokens launched
3
16
605
Replying to @robcrt
Don't have to do anything. I love this shit and do it by choice.
1
1
197