A take that I haven’t seen is the pressure that lands on legacy enterprises and businesses because of this launch! Users and clients will no longer tolerate terrible interfaces if even the government pulls this type of UX. The bar just got a lot higher on what people expect when using an online service.

Open-source as a corporate strategy (rather than philanthropy) has been around for a while. I feel like with AI rewriting the rule book, it will become more prevalent. If you build in crypto, aren't open rails > closed networks. Foundation governance > recapture risk? Linus's Law applies to money too, I'd say. More eyes, fewer bugs, harder to capture.

Assuming the central thesis here is correct, which is that general payment infrastructure is effectively solved, I'd be very interested in what doors this opens.

I love this, and we don't talk about it nearly enough. Tokenization is a fantastic tool, but you need to get your ducks in a row in the real world first.

Excited to be backing @tiagobnova and the amazing @novadotmarkets team! Congrats on the fundraise 🤘🏻

I did not expect to be reading a Papal encyclical and debating it this much, but here we are.

The major question about stablecoins, if they get adopted at large, as I expect they will, is where the backing dollars actually land. If they go into central-bank reserves, are private issuers the only thing separating us from tokenised central-bank money?

Another amazing piece by @Sumcap ❤️

This rings true. AI doesn't really map well to what came before. It's better to rethink from first principles than to just try and figure out where it fits.