Software architect with strong opinions | Offering 15+ years of knowledge to Tech professionals | I share insights and real world experiences in the IT business

Everywhere
Joined July 2007
Look at this if you are tired of bullshit on the social media or the digital nomad solopreneur bullshit community youtu.be/V1Mt3YJYb2A?is=KxpR…
103
I thought people here were crazy about hyping stuff. On youtube they are simply delirious
75
Being able to recall and recognise a big amount of notions is not intelligence
159
Devs try to solve known problems with every new version of every model. I ask music theory questions to see if it is still shit.
42
The reason I am scrolling here…I can’t move
5
123
This is the angle I like when talking about AI.
I've gone through about 5 rounds of having my programming work automated since I started coding in assembly. Each one was fun and interesting and made me more valuable. AI coding seems like that too, so far.
89
Btw I am strongly against AI Music
1
1
116
Every person that use the word productivity without mentioning the goals they are trying to achieve should shut up. “XYZ improve productivity…” What are you producing? Oranges? User Stories? Line of code? CO2 (for sure)? Happiness I hate this fucking preachers
2
3
206
Let an agent generate configuration properties and you will have a problem.
89
I know why I lost all my reach on X I stopped engaging positively with content that doesn’t interest me. When I was trying to gain traction here I was answering every post of the people I was following. Now I stopped lying. Don’t get me wrong, what this people are writing is not wrong per se, but I cannot force myself to engage with yet another “10 pattern to know to pass a system design interview” or “The importance is f CDN” or similar kind of “educational content. I published a lot of those things in the past but my idea of consuming and creating content changed. I don’t want to explain the same thing for the millionth time. I don’t want to create a post in a topic that can be explained by an LLM better and more precisely (even worst would be publish generated content). This disenchantment costed me exposure but I gained some authenticity. If I comment one of your post it is because it interests me, in both a positive or negative way.
1
5
228
I totally agree with this view. The tool is already used incredibly powerful. The effort you put in trying to make it better will never pay off. This is the equivalent of the people spending countless hours setting up and tweaking their IDE and working tools. The ROI is basically nothing
Replying to @RhysSullivan
anyone talking about their custom setups to make ai more effective isn't doing anything useful coding used to be manual labor. typing the code out, doing large changes, jumping between files. a fancy, bespoke setup could make a difference but it's not like that anymore, you have a magic box you can say stuff into and things happen people haven't understood this, they're still spending their energy tinkering with what's behind the box. the underlying tone is always frustration. they're clearly not happy and maybe even on a burn out path the best people at this are doing the best work of their life all while happier than ever they could do this even on a vanilla setup the box can already do amazing things. it can even produce the best code of your life. it's limited entirely by the person using it and their creativity and their ambition and you're not gonna get that in a skill file
3
194
"new" 😂
The new development cycle in one image.
130
I want to find a Software project adjacent to Music to work to. Anyone as an idea, a repo, needs a hand?
2
240
I still see way too many people selling material on how to grow on social media. And the content is mostly about tell other people how to grow on social media. This ridiculous catch 22 will never stop disgust me
1
105
Coding with AI os efficient but boring. I had way more fun lately taking generated code and make it readable LLMs are good imitating the style of a big codebase but variable naming applying DDD principles is not the main strength
1
2
159
I am benefit from the new algorithm as a reader but not as a poster. Since when nerds don’t like grumpy devs with strong opinions?
1
90
speaking of the algorithm gives me better reach?
151
“Ideas are infinite” is the most dangerous concept I ever heard in my opinion. Not because is not true. Ideas are infinite. Reducing the value of something because it is infinite is dangerous if not stupid. The advent of tools that help build products out of ideas faster and easier reduced drastically the “value” of an idea. In the past we would have validated the idea before building something, now there are hundreds of shit product released everyday because ideas are infinite and why not try all of them?
1
1
186
Exactly!
Just remember: More code, more problems.
199
Riccardo Causo retweeted
Validation is a mirage. “How do you validate if it’s going to work?” “How do you know if people will buy it to not?” “How do you validate product market fit?” “How do you validate if a feature is worth building?” “How do you validate a design?” You can’t. You can’t. You can’t. You can’t. You can’t. I mean you can, but not in spirit of the questions being asked. What people are asking about is certainty ahead of time. But time doesn’t start when you start working on something, or when you have a piece of the whole ready. It starts when the whole thing hits the market. How do you know if what you’re doing is right while you’re doing it? You can’t be. You can only have a hunch, a feeling, a belief. And if the only way to tell if you’ve completely missed the mark is to ask other people and wait for them to tell you, then you’re likely too far lost from the start. If you make products, you better have a sense of where you’re heading without having to ask for directions. There’s really only one real way to get as close to certain as possible. That’s to build the actual thing and make it actually available for anyone to try, use, and buy. Real usage on real things on real days during the course of real work is the only way to validate anything. And even then, it’s barely validation since there are so many other variables at play. Timing, marketing, pricing, messaging, etc. Truth is, you don’t know, you won’t know, you’ll never know until you know and reflect back on something real. And the best way to find out, is to believe in it, make it, and put it out there. You do your best, you promote it the best you can, you prepare yourself the best way you know how. And then you literally cross your fingers. I’m not kidding. You can’t validate something that doesn’t exist. You can’t validate an idea. You can’t validate someone’s guess. You can’t validate an abstraction. You can’t validate a sketch, or a wireframe, or an MVP that isn’t the actual product. When I hear MVP, I don’t think Minimum Viable Product. I think Minimum Viable Pie. The food kind. A slice of pie is all you need to evaluate the whole pie. It’s homogenous. But that’s not how products work. Products are a collection of interwoven parts, one dependent on another, one leading to another, one integrating with another. You can’t take a slice a product, ask people how they like it, and deduce they’ll like the rest of the product once you’ve completed it. All you learn is that they like or don’t like the slice you gave them. If you want to see if something works, make it. The whole thing. The simplest version of the whole thing – that’s what version 1.0 is supposed to be. But make that, put it out there, and learn. If you want answers, you have to ask the question, and the question is: Market, what do you think of this completed version 1.0 of our product? Don’t mistake an impression of a piece of your product as a proxy for the whole truth. When you give someone a slice of something that isn’t homogenous, you’re asking them to guess. You can’t base certainty on that. That said, there’s one common way to uncertainty: That’s to ask one more person their opinion. It’s easy to think the more opinions you have, the more certain you’ll be, but in practice it’s quite the opposite. If you ever want to be less sure of yourself, less confident in the outcome, just ask someone else what they think. It works every time.
"validate before you build" is advice for people with audiences. if you have 0 followers, the build IS the validation. ship it, show it, then talk.
50
61
17
639
131,236