I know this account is a bit, but this is a very accurate representation of the greater Philly area.
Before I visited Pennsylvania, everyone warned me that Philadelphia people are the toughest, most impatient people in America.
I believed them until I walked toward the front door of a Wawa gas station.
I was still forty feet away in the parking lot, walking between rows of cars.
A massive construction worker in steel-toe boots, carrying a twenty-four-ounce coffee in one hand and a paper-wrapped hoagie in the other, pushed open the glass door to leave. Then he saw me.
He stopped. He planted his boot against the bottom of the door. And he waited.
Forty feet is a very long distance when a grown man is holding a door for you in the wind.
In Japan, to make a stranger wait carries great shame. So I broke into that awkward half-jog every man performs when he wishes to show gratitude without looking like he is fleeing a crime.
"Go ahead, boss," he said as I passed.
Ten minutes later, as I walked out with my own sandwich, I saw an elderly woman locking her car thirty feet away.
I planted my foot against the glass. I held the door.
Another man behind me held the inner door. Within seconds we had formed an impromptu honor guard of grumpy men holding glass doors in complete silence.
Philadelphia may boo Santa Claus.
But inside the three-foot radius of a Wawa doorway, they have the manners of the imperial court.
1
49
Red retweeted
It's immoral to participate in a discourse without having done the reading. That's why I tore through Abundance so fast. The discourse was so magnetic, but to have posted about it without having read it would have been a sin.
Hard disagree with someone whose perspective I often value. First, we don’t need more incentives to criminalize behavior. Second, speaking as someone who mended the prior gen’s NC in my own family, sometimes parents have good non-criminal reasons. It’s not for me to judge.
The guys in my group chat have raked me over the coals for this. And although in general I maintain that I am correct, they have forced me to acknowledge two things:
1) I have here articulated a general principle; that is not to say it never has any exceptions to it
2) one persistent exception is that I should have said “something which is criminal or would be criminal or should be criminal.” You don’t have to wait for actual crimes to occur; reasonable threat of them is sufficient. Moreover societal law often deviates from what it ought to be— if something genuinely should be a crime with jail time but society doesn’t call it such that would still be grounds for separation IMHO
So, points to the guys, here’s the nuance you have requested.
50
Red retweeted
And so it begins: ©-maximalism breaking AI: Seedance 2 refused the following prompt, blaming concerns about copyright. Hey ©-maximalists: Where do I go to license the right to create a cartoon "in the style of a 1960s cartoon"?
"A cartoon character in the style of a 1960s cartoon approaches a soda machine; he puts twenty-five cents into the machine and presses a button; the machine shakes a bit but then does nothing; the character gets angry and shakes the machine, but nothing happens."
Confirmation that the CPSC (1) is a redditor (2) follows r/flashlight and (3) is pumped that u/Zak’s Arbitrary List of Popular Flashlights was updated today: reddit.com/r/flashlight/s/AC…
1
240
Been thinking about this a lot since I saw it this weekend.
I think Christopher Nolan's decision to turn the Odyssey into a story about the Late Bronze Age Collapse was actually pretty cool. The antiwar and pro-civilization message was ultimately more interesting than the source material's focus on individual heroism.
2
148
I’ve been thinking about some stuff at work as a CRM problem. Interesting to think about even more applications.
I love seeing more people experimenting with CRMs for more than just sales, and actual relationship support
But everything I've seen makes the same critical mistake:
they start by importing contacts
This is terrible signal for a CRM foundation. Here's what I did instead
84
Red retweeted
Compare contrast, the extremely lax and forgiving personal and business bankruptcy laws in the United States
Red retweeted
Intellectual property laws are usually used strictly to prohibit other parties from using the IP. Theoretically the idea is to issue licenses, but the owner can set whatever terms they like, or commonly just say “no”.
The “mechanical license” for song compositions is an interesting counterpoint. Anyone can cover a song without negotiating or even asking, they just have to pay a fixed fee to the composer for each copy sold.
That is a big contrast with the iron grip of control that IP usually provides. Someone that an artist personally despises can freely cover their song and potentially get rich doing it. You can’t decide that your composition is any more valuable than something you consider obvious trash.
Music IP has tons of messy aspects, but this narrow, somewhat outdated (focused on sales vs streaming) area seems pretty good.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechan…
The fundamental idea of IP is that the government enforces a somewhat unnatural bargain because society benefits on net from playing the game that way – more creative and innovative works will be produced if the creators can control and exploit their work for a time period.
That is not a law of the universe, it is a hypothesis, and it should always be under evaluation. Out of self interest, the owners of IP will always want more power, but letting them control lawmaking is generally exploiting the rest of society.
Never use “we” or “our” if it excludes the recipient. E.g., “we will get back to you” is unacceptable.
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
102
Red retweeted
Coding is basically the pinnacle of what you could reasonably automate with AI, and yet we still need human engineers to oversee agents for them to be effective.
The AI models are trained on an incredible amount of sophisticated code. The users are highly technical and can use the latest tools quickly. The work is “verifiable” because you can test an app. The outcomes are often removed from the quality of the code (you can have sloppy code but the app can still work). And the context for the agent is often already digitized and sitting in the codebase.
That’s an incredible amount of benefits that AI coding agents get to work with. Some of those apply to knowledge work, but most don’t in areas where the work needs to be fully reviewed to be useful, or where data isn’t as abundantly digitized. This makes the job for agents in knowledge work more complicated.
So if with all of that, engineers still remain in very high demand, the risks are going to be less than what’s perceived for other areas of knowledge work. Agents will let people do far more than they did before, but the people don’t go away.
Red retweeted
The two reasons that coding strikes me as qualitatively distinct:
A very large public corpus of information on how to do the job.
Instant feedback for the model once it’s taken a wrong turn (the ability to try lots of things or in quick succession and see what “works”).
Red retweeted
flipside of the popularity of LitRPGs, wherein the world works the way it is claimed to and effort is materially rewarded
Red retweeted
My wife mentioned a nice private school over dinner this week
She said the campus was beautiful
I asked what's the tuition
She said we should look at it as an investment in him not a cost
I made a note
She said don't make a note
I said I always make notes
She said this isn't a deal
I said everything is a deal
She closed her eyes
She said we'd discuss it Saturday
I agreed
Saturday 7:02am
She came downstairs in her Saturday robe
Coffee in hand
I had my cargo shorts on
The dining room had been cleared
The projector was on
The analyst was at the head of the table
Quarter zip on, three iced coffees, a legal pad, and two laptops
He had been there since 6:44am
I texted him at 11:14pm Friday
The text said dining room 6:45am bring the model
He sent a thumbs up
My wife stopped in the doorway
She said what is this
I said you said you wanted to discuss it
She said this is not a discussion
I did not respond
She sat down anyway
The analyst stood
He said good morning ma'am
She did not respond
He sat back down
A printed deck in front of each seat
A fourth copy in case
Slide 1 Tuition Schedule
$38,500 per year
Thirteen years
$500,500 nominal
Before escalators
The school has raised tuition 4.2% per year for a decade
With escalators $648,000
My wife said okay
I said I'm not done
Slide 2 Opportunity Cost
Even before escalators
$38,500 invested annually
10% nominal return
S&P long-run average since 1928
By his eighteenth birthday $944,000
My wife said we can afford it
I said I know that's not the slide
Slide 3 Terminal Value at Age 65
$83 million
She was quiet
The analyst slid the sensitivity tables across the table
8% return $31 million
10% return $83 million
12% return $222 million
She did not look
She said this isn't about money
I said it's always about money
She said no it isn't
I said then what is it about
She did not answer
She said you can't put a dollar value on his teachers his classmates his environment
I said I can the analyst already did slide 6
He flipped to slide 6
She did not look
She said the school is the best in the city
I said best is a feeling
She said it produces the best students
I said the students were already the best before they got there
She said our son deserves it
I said our son deserves $83 million
My son walked in
He is five
Dinosaur pajamas
He looked at the projector
He looked at the open deck on the table
He looked at slide 3
He said are we modeling pre-tax or after-tax
The analyst opened a new tab
My wife looked at the ceiling
He said what's the discount rate
The analyst set down his pen
She closed her eyes
He said is this the same return assumption from the 529 conversation
The analyst stopped typing
He looked at me
I did not say anything
She stood up
Sat back down
He said dad can I help
I said yes
He pulled up a chair
The analyst handed him a printout
He started reading
My wife watched him read
She watched him for a long time
She said his name
He looked up
She said do you like school
He said the work is too easy and the kids don't ask questions
She did not respond
She looked at the ceiling
She walked out of the room
The analyst started packing up
He said should I follow up Monday sir
I said no follow up needed
He'll be fine
Sent from my iPhone
