Renzo (@ranfossi) profile picture

trader of sorts

United States
Joined February 2012
Photo by Renzo (@ranfossi)Photo by Renzo (@ranfossi)Photo by Renzo (@ranfossi)Photo by Renzo (@ranfossi)Photo by Renzo (@ranfossi)Photo by Renzo (@ranfossi)Photo by Renzo (@ranfossi)Photo by Renzo (@ranfossi)Photo by Renzo (@ranfossi)Photo by Renzo (@ranfossi)
"We anticipate nonfarm payrolls to be higher than the +170k consensus, driving a dip in risk assets before the equities cash open..." Make sure you sign up for these emails 👇
1
386
coming up 👇
We're starting the week off with... 💬 Insiders Talk #Crypto with @krugermacro, Kenny Estes, @mleinweber2 & @AshBennington. 📊 Daily Briefing with @NoelleInMadrid & @maggielake. Join us 👉 rvtv.io/3KSxzkN
1
2
556
3/4 On the contrary, If you wait for the carry profile to turn positive on a trade like this, then most likely, it will be gone or not as attractive. But carry profiles are not static. There is a future where the 4.60 yield you earn on your bond will be way above the ON rate.
1
299
4/4 In fact, when it was time to short bonds (pay rates) in 2021/2022, those structures also had negative carry profiles for many months and they were painful to hold. There is a saying in rates trading that goes something like "the road to hell is paved with positive carry."
1
286
Bottom line is that whether your trade has positive/negative carry, you have to know why you are being compensated (positive carry) or what optionality you are paying for (negative carry).
3
261
1/3 Was chatting about the resilience of stocks given the rise in yields in the past week. I say look under the hood- the index is being supported by the megacap and quality tech- This idea of all tech being a long duration asset is misguided.
3
4
1
26
19,427
2/3 Megacap profitability is here, does not need to be discounted out 20y. Their cash is getting juicy yields and there is no urgency to refinance what so ever. So higher yields are kind of a benefit for big tech, pushes out competition and cements their lead further .
3
1
12
815
3/3 If you are the CFO of say META do you really care the 10y is at 4.5? you have no urgency to access the capital markets and your business is growing and FCF positive, but as a bonus you also grow your cash pile at 5%
1
9
664
A common narrative is that higher rates hurt the tech sector more due to its long duration. However, we argue megacap stocks have built massive war chests and are, in fact, benefiting from these higher yields. Subscribe for more.
209
Check out our latest short-term tactical views and stay ahead of market trends—subscribe for more insights. tinyurl.com/mvyr5d3n
1
4
1
17
12,228
Ackman's ill-timed tourist trade 1. The central bank of Brazil literally surprised the market today and cut 50bps. They are experts at inflationary cycles and have been way ahead of the curve in the current one.
I have been surprised how low US long-term rates have remained in light of structural changes that are likely to lead to higher levels of long-term inflation including de-globalization, higher defense costs, the energy transition, growing entitlements, and the greater bargaining power of workers. As a result, I would be very surprised if we don’t find ourselves in a world with persistent ~3% inflation. From a supply/demand perspective, long-term Treasurys (T) also look overbought. With $32 trillion of debt and large deficits as far as the eye can see and higher refi rates, an increasing supply of T is assured. When you couple new issuance with QT, it is hard to imagine how the market absorbs such a large increase in supply without materially higher rates. I have also been puzzled as to why the @USTreasury hasn’t been financing our government in the longer part of the curve in light of materially lower long-term rates. This does not look like prudent term management in my opinion. Then consider China’s (and other countries’) desire to decouple financially from the US, YCC ending in Japan increasing the relative appeal of Yen bonds vs. T for the largest foreign owner of T, and growing concerns about US governance, fiscal responsibility, and political divisiveness recently referenced in Fitch’s downgrade. So if long-term inflation is 3% instead of 2% and history holds, then we could see the 30-year T yield = 3% + 0.5% (the real rate) + 2% (term premium) or 5.5%, and it can happen soon. There are many times in history where the bond market reprices the long end of the curve in a matter of weeks, and this seems like one of those times. That’s why we are short in size the 30-year T — first as a hedge on the impact of higher LT rates on stocks, and second because we believe it is a high probability standalone bet. There are few macro investments that still offer reasonably probable asymmetric payoffs and this is one of them. The best hedges are the ones you would invest in anyway even if you didn’t need the hedge. This fits that bill, and also I think we need the hedge.
1
1,490
4. By betting on higher 30y rates instead, there is a scenario where if inflation resurfaces the long part of the curve does nothing or even goes lower on a flight to quality move.
1
173
Bottom line: if inflation resurfaces, the obvious trade is for shorter tenors to rise further ( 1y-2y T-bills for example, not 30y yields). Even in the scariest times of debt ceiling standoffs the US Treasury market fails to deliver true panic in the longer tenors ( 20y-30y ).
1
170
With the FOMC decision ahead, I am reminded of the crazy pre-GFC period in 07. Bernanke's FED cut 325bps way before the Lehman moment and into an inflationary spiral ( Oil ATH). The subsequent drop in inflation was even more violent and Bernanke came out as clairvoyant.
1
1
224
If I am policy maker and I see this chart, why would I hike another 25bps when inflation has a 3 handle and trending in the right direction? The risks of a policy mistake are rising.
77