The TTD tech tree has advanced a level! - ttd-capa-cpp: reimplementation of ttd-capa that supports code scanning - capa-cpp: C++ reimplementation of capa with added IDA Pro plugin Shoutout to Xusheng (@CrackmesOne) for his help! github.com/HullaBrian/ttd-ca… github.com/HullaBrian/capa-c…

MIT published a brutally honest report on what AI is doing to students. A committee of professors and students spent five months studying how AI changed learning on campus, and the findings read like a warning to every university on the planet. Study groups are disappearing. Office hours are emptying out. Problem sets and take-home exams no longer prove anything, because AI can produce credible solutions to almost any written assignment in the undergraduate curriculum. Students who lean on chatbots lose mastery and confidence, and some slip into what the report calls cognitive surrender, reaching for AI at the first hint of struggle. The numbers are rough. 46 percent of surveyed MIT undergrads use LLMs daily. 90 percent worry about their own overreliance. Undergrads who feel AI makes them replaceable now outnumber those who feel it makes them capable. The committee's answer surprised me. They refused to fight AI with surveillance. The report calls AI detectors unreliable, says lockdown browsers feel like spying, and warns that policing students builds a classroom atmosphere of mutual distrust. Instead, MIT wants to rebuild education around the things AI can't replace. That means oral exams, semester portfolios, in-person project work, and a required social component in every subject. The report even floats the idea of rethinking grades entirely, since without a GPA to optimize, much of the incentive to cheat with AI evaporates. The committee warns professors against replacing undergrad research assistants with AI agents just because they're cheaper, because a university exists to grow people, not output. The most famous tech school on earth admitted the machines broke its way of teaching. Its answer is more humans, not more software.

As I’ve read more and more LLM output, I’ve grown to appreciate even poorly written human writing

Totally agree, that's why I am planning to do this year's #FlareOn without using AI (unless there is a task where it's specifically required). The competitive side of the challenge may be dead, but we still can choose to have fun. Just like existence of a mountain lift doesn't have to kill the pleasure of climbing.