Your national ID, your medical records, your bank account, your child’s school file, every government service you will ever touch. All of it will run on the system being built right now under “Maldives 2.0.” Citizens have not been consulted. The full plan is not public. There is no way to comment on it. Open digital.gov.mv and judge for yourself. The site lists 8 pillars and initiatives like “draft amendments”, “unclear milestones” and “review implementation,” but the document is missing timelines, owners, budgets, and measurable outcomes, meaning no one can be held accountable when delivery fails. This is a table of contents dressed up as a strategy. @presidencymv Citizens elected HEP @MMuizzu on a Maldives First mandate, the single defining promise this government has to deliver. Yet Maldives 2.0 appears modelled on European digital governance experience, excluding the Maldivians who actually build, operate, and secure systems in this country. UNDP’s June 2025 assessment independently confirmed this gap. HEP @MMuizzu has pledged that the digital economy will contribute 15% of GDP by 2030. That target cannot be hit by a whole-of-government approach alone, because the government lacks the in-house capacity and no country has ever built a digital economy without its local innovators co-designing it. Without the ecosystem at the table, the outcome is predictable: the Maldives stays an import economy, never becomes an export economy, and never produces a single tech unicorn. The 15% pledge becomes a slogan. Is this what the government’s own manifesto stands for? Excluding the very builders and talent the ecosystem depends on? Speaking personally, we have already given up hope. @Synetecs, recognised as Startup of the Year at MSME 2025, is now a Delaware, US-registered startup focused globally. We hold active engagements with global manufacturers, yet at home there is no seat at the table to raise concerns or contribute expertise. This is the last plea: listen, and deliver. We want what is best for this ecosystem. Otherwise we leave, and we build elsewhere. The fix is not another workshop or summit. Those are photo opportunities, not policy instruments. Publish the draft papers for every Maldives 2.0 initiative. Open a formal public comments window with a defined response period. That is how serious governments build serious digital economies. @encreastudio @javaabumv @oxiqamv @solidtreemv @theloopcraft

To every Maldivian. Please read before buying $CWU. The on-chain reality is very different from what is being told. The 44% holder of $CWU supply is not a person. it is a Vault, a smart contract the creator set to “permissioned” mode with a private whitelist of 217 wallets. 217 wallet paid just $87,000 and received 879 million CWU at $0.0001 each that is 88% of the entire supply, before anyone else could buy. rugcheck.xyz/tokens/CmVUoJUt… 13 of the 217 wallets have already sold. They paid $8,572 in total and cashed out $1.10 million a combined profit of $1.09 million, an average return of 128x to all those who initially panic buyers on sudden price hike. The top wallet turned $839 into $129,047. Three of the top four sellers are wallets created just days before $CWU launched. $CWU is shown as worth $72 million on paper as thats the current marketcap. But the real money in the trading pool, the only place anyone can actually sell is just $384,000 of SOL. refer - solscan.io/account/DKQiZKjkb… That $384K is the maximum total cash anyone can ever extract from this token, combined, for all holders, ever. The stated value is 187 times larger than the money backing it. Banks must hold cash reserves against deposits: USDC stablecoin is 100% backed, a regulated bank holds about 15%, Basel III requires 10.5%, the ECB minimum is 1%. $CWU’s reserve ratio is 0.53%. A bank this thin would be shut down by regulators within hours. When a new buyer purchases $CWU, their SOL flows into the pool and an old insider sells their cheap tokens, walking away with that new buyer’s money. No product is built, no value is created. The 204 wallets still holding need a constant stream of new buyers or the structure collapses on whoever is last. This is the on-chain mechanic, not speculation. The 10% wallet - A separate insider wallet, 4Xue...Byq7, received 100 million CWU directly from the creator at launch bypassing the vault entirely. It still holds 99.5 million tokens (~$7.9M on paper) and has not sold. This is possibly the insiders whose profiles are used falling in as a victim to this Ponzi scheme? If this single wallet ever sells into the $384K pool, the pool will drain to near zero and every remaining holder loses everything. solscan.io/account/4XueSS5sq… Why this matters We are a small country that runs on tourism and global trust. A former President’s name attached to a token of this structure is a reputational risk to every Maldivian not only to those who buy in. The evidence is now on-chain and public. Respectfully to @MohamedNasheed — the longer your name remains attached, the more people will buy on the strength of it. Stepping back is not weakness. It is protecting people who trusted you. A famous name does not change tokenomics. Verify: rugcheck.xyz/tokens/CmVUoJUt…