Rural Physician, Medical Educator, Medical Informaticist. Interests: Health Informatics, Clinical Research, Edtech in Health Profs & Medical Education.

Pondicherry, India
Joined August 2009
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
if you're using claude to edit videos, you can give it a library of 5.2M+ audio files for $0 sound effects, ambience, music. openverse has a free api. no key needed. give it api.openverse.org and ask: “whenever you need sound effects search Openverse to find the best options and use them for tasteful sound design within my video” no more using your browser to download random clips or trying to generate the audio itself
85
259
23
4,159
228,253
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
How a civilisational nation can be destroyed without defeating its army! Critical lesson for Indians in these times from Douglas Kruger, who uses Poland in this case study:
76
1,841
71
4,154
100,743
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
I explained why almost every actor and artist ends up on the same side. Today I want to show you that none of this is an accident. It was theorized almost a hundred years ago, by an Italian communist sitting in a prison cell. His name was Antonio Gramsci. Once you understand his idea, you will see it everywhere. Start with the problem Gramsci was trying to solve. Karl Marx had predicted that workers in rich countries would rise up and overthrow capitalism. It never happened. Workers in Italy, France, England and America didn't want a revolution. They went to church on Sunday. They loved their country. They wanted a house, a family, a better life for their kids. The communists couldn't understand it. They had the theory, the anger, the slogans. Why wasn't anyone following them? Gramsci, locked up by Mussolini, spent years thinking about this. And he found the answer. His answer was this: a society isn't held together by police and soldiers. It's held together by what people believe is normal. What you learned at school. What your priest told you. What the newspaper says. What the movies show you. What your neighbors think is obvious. Gramsci called this "hegemony." Put simply, it means: whoever decides what is normal, rules. So he drew a conclusion that changed everything. In the West, you can't win by attacking the palace. You'll lose. People will defend the system because they believe in it. You first have to change what people believe. You have to win the schools, the universities, the newspapers, the arts, the churches. Slowly. Patiently. Trench by trench. He called it a "war of position." Once the culture is yours, politics falls into your hands like ripe fruit. Forty years later, in 1967, a German student leader named Rudi Dutschke turned this idea into a battle plan. He called it "the long march through the institutions." The idea was simple. Don't burn down the university. Become the professor. Don't attack the newspaper. Become the editor. Don't fight the courts. Become the judge. Get inside every institution, rise to the top, and change it from within. Now watch how it works in real life, step by step. A young activist goes to university. He stays. He becomes a professor. Now he trains thousands of students every year. Those students become teachers, journalists, lawyers, HR managers, screenwriters, civil servants. They all learned the same ideas from the same people. They hire people who think like them. After one generation, the institution has changed. After two, nobody remembers it was ever different. Studies have found that at elite American colleges, Democrat professors outnumber Republicans by roughly ten to one, and in some departments there are almost none. That isn't a conspiracy meeting in a basement. It's what a completed march looks like. And here is the most powerful part. Once the institutions are won, you don't need to force anyone. People absorb the ideas without noticing. A fish doesn't know it's wet. A young actor who grew up with teachers, drama coaches, screenwriters, agents and award juries who all think the same way doesn't need to read Gramsci. He just breathes the air. To him, these are not opinions. They are simply what good people believe. And anyone who disagrees isn't someone with a different view. He's a bad person. That's the final stage of hegemony. Disagreement stops being an argument and becomes a moral stain. You don't debate the other side anymore. You cancel it. This is why Hollywood thinks as one. This is why so many newsrooms sound identical. This is why your kids come home from college with ideas you never taught them. Nobody had to give an order. The march was already over. Conservatives made one huge mistake for fifty years. They thought winning elections was enough. They focused on Washington while the other side took the classrooms, the studios, and the newsrooms. They won some votes and lost the culture. And as Andrew Breitbart used to say, politics is downstream of culture. The good news is that a march can go in both directions. Buying Twitter and turning it into X was one institution taken back. There will be others. But it won't happen by complaining. It will happen when people who love freedom start teaching, writing, filming, building, and creating again. They understood the game a hundred years ago. It's time you did too.
Ask yourself a simple question. Why is almost every celebrity on the same side? Actors, singers, late-night hosts, award-show presenters. Thousands of people with different backgrounds, different lives, different temperaments. And somehow, on every major issue, they land on the exact same opinion, at the exact same moment, with the exact same hashtags. Free minds don't behave like that. An ecosystem does. Now ask a second question. Elon Musk is landing rockets on their own tails. He's bringing internet to villages that never had a phone line. He's building cars that drive themselves and implants that let paralyzed people move a cursor with their thoughts. Artists are supposed to be the ones who dream about the future. Here is a man actually building it. How many of them stand next to him? A handful. Why? Because Hollywood is not a free market of talent. It's a royal court. A young actor doesn't make it because he's good. Hundreds are good. He makes it because someone lets him in: an agent, a casting director, a producer, a studio, an awards committee. Every step is a gate, and every gate has a keeper. When your whole career depends on a few rooms, you learn very quickly what can be said in those rooms and what can't. This is how it works. First you stay silent. Then you nod. Then you repeat. Then you believe. Compromise never arrives all at once. It arrives one dinner, one role, one red carpet at a time. And once you've given up enough, you need the system to stay in place, because the system is the only thing that makes the sacrifice worth it. Want to see the whole mechanism in a single story? For decades, one of the most powerful producers in Hollywood was the subject of accusations from dozens of women, and much of the industry treated it as an open secret. A host even joked about it at an Oscar nominations announcement, and the room laughed. Speaking up seriously meant losing everything. When the truth finally broke, the same industry dressed in black and applauded its own courage. Silence while it pays. Virtue once it's safe. That's the system. And that's the real lie. Not that these people are monsters. Most aren't. The lie is calling it courage. Real courage costs you something. Saying what every room in town already applauds costs nothing. Saying the opposite is what costs. That's why so few artists stand with Elon. Not because they've studied his ideas and rejected them, but because standing there is a career risk they can't afford. Look at what happened to him when he left the consensus. Advertisers fled. Friends disappeared. Invitations stopped. He could afford it. Almost nobody else can. That tells you exactly how free that world really is. So wake up. Stop taking your political cues from people whose paycheck depends on agreeing. A celebrity endorsement is not an argument. It's a loyalty signal. Your vote, your convictions, your children's future: don't outsource them to people who are paid to recite lines someone else wrote. The people who build the future rarely get applause from the people who perform it. Think for yourself. It's the most American thing you can do.
128
1,316
133
3,870
108,494
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
We made a fair OCR benchmark. And we're not ranked first. Introducing OmniParseBench - 16k tests across 90 languages with consistent, interpretable scoring.
16
50
5
372
19,854
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
My teacher team has recently been discussing rubrics, so I wanted to check out Brookhart's oft-cited research on their quality and effectiveness. Her 2015 review of 63 studies found that rubrics improve student learning, but only when they describe the quality of thinking, not just list tasks to complete. Well-designed rubrics helped students perform better across writing, science, math, and other subjects. The core problem Brookhart identified: many rubrics conflate different skills or measure nothing meaningful. Take "has three sources" as an example. What does this actually measure—research skills? Source evaluation? Synthesis ability? It's unclear, and that matters. If we provide sources to students, it measures only compliance. If students find sources themselves, it lumps together distinct intellectual skills without clarity. Students can't aim for a fuzzy target, and teachers can't give useful feedback when criteria blur multiple competencies together. Effective rubrics are precise about what thinking skill they're measuring: "evaluates source credibility using relevant criteria" (research skill), "synthesizes information across multiple sources" (integration skill), or "interprets evidence to support claims" (analytical skill). This specificity helps students understand exactly what quality work looks like and helps teachers see where students actually need support. When rubrics clearly name distinct thinking skills, they guide learning. When they list vague requirements or blend skills together, they just create hoops to jump through. tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1…
1
7
1
15
1,888
Еще один герой в этой цепочке чудес, произошедших на рейсе из Дубая, - Шота Мусаев. Шота - стоматолог и был единственным врачом на борту. Он стал одним из трех пассажиров, которые ворвались в кабину пилотов и остановили террориста. Вместе они связали нападавшему руки и ноги проводами от наушников. А затем Шота остановил кровотечение у тяжелораненого капитана Смита Маччхара. По словам саудовских врачей, если бы не действия Шоты, капитан бы умер.
564
7,253
175
46,170
642,615
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
You'll be shocked after hearing what Captain Smit Machchar said to the passengers 🚨 Doctor Maya Peretz - “Smit is truly a brave man. Everyone on that plane was brave. Everything was going normally, and I was peacefully taking a nap. Suddenly, the whole plane shook so violently that people started panicking. After some time, some of us saw the cockpit door being opened. I was sitting in the last seats, so I couldn't clearly see what had happened. But when people started attacking the Muslim pilot, Captain Smit said, ‘Leave him. If anyone can control the plane, have a look.’ Some of us were even ready to throw that man out of the plane. But Captain Smit and few of us doctors insisted that we should not do it and let officials deal with him. I truly want my daughter to become as great a human being as him. I pray to lord that he recovers soon.” No matter which country you belong to, everyone should aspire to be a human like Smit 🙏❤️
136
3,319
48
26,088
1,356,059
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
Captain Smit Machchhar is a HERO. In the face of the gravest danger and despite being seriously injured, he showed immense courage and an unwavering resolve to protect the lives of others. His valour helped save hundreds of lives and avert a great tragedy. India is proud of Captain Machchhar. Praying for his speedy recovery, renewed strength and good health.
3,124
38,225
1,388
177,649
3,776,024
My salute to the Indian pilot Captain Smit Machchhar for his extraordinary bravery. Despite being stabbed and seriously injured, he fought back, resisted, opened the cockpit door, and enabled passengers and crew to overpower the attacker — preventing a catastrophic mid-air disaster. He saved the lives of 174 people, including Israeli citizens and other nationals. I wish Captain Machchhar a speedy and full recovery. He is a true hero.
8,034
79,881
3,431
411,110
13,980,178
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
When I hosted the President of #India for State Dinner on the first such visit to a #Nordic country, I also offered an all-vegetarian menu. More than 20 years ago! And in #Iceland where it is not easy to be vegetarian!!
People are mocking this BRICS state dinner because it is vegetarian. This is not “just a vegetarian menu.” It is a carefully curated showcase of Indian ingredients, regional traditions and fine-dining technique. Look at what is actually on the table: • Gucchi / Himalayan morels — among India’s most prized mushrooms. They grow seasonally in Himalayan regions, are difficult to source in quantity and are traditionally hand-collected, which is why good-quality morels command premium prices. • Saffron — one of the world’s most expensive spices by weight. Thousands of delicate crocus flowers are needed to produce a small amount of saffron. • Mamra almonds — a premium almond variety valued for its rich flavour, high natural oil content and limited production compared with ordinary commercial almonds. • Sheermal — a saffron-scented bread with Persian-Mughal culinary roots, traditionally associated with rich festive and royal-style cuisine. • Khandvi Mille-Feuille — not simply “gram flour.” Khandvi itself requires precision to cook, spread paper-thin and roll properly; presenting it as a mille-feuille turns a Gujarati classic into fine dining without losing its identity. • Khumb Galouti — a vegetarian interpretation of the famous galouti style, using mushrooms to create the same soft, delicate texture while keeping the menu entirely vegetarian. • Millets — ancient Indian grains brought into a modern state-banquet setting, combining heritage with contemporary nutrition and sustainability. • Phirni with mulberries and gold leaf — a traditional milk-and-rice dessert finished with fruit and edible gold, giving a centuries-old dish a ceremonial, luxurious presentation. And that is what makes this menu impressive. It moves from Gujarat to North India, the Himalayas, South India and Old Delhi; from humble grains and lentils to saffron, morels, premium almonds and gold leaf. This was not vegetarian food chosen because something was “missing.” It was vegetarian food chosen because Indian cuisine is rich enough to make meat completely unnecessary. The menu is thoughtful, regional, luxurious and unmistakably Indian. Sometimes luxury is not a steak on a plate. Sometimes it is a wild Himalayan morel, a few strands of saffron, and centuries of culinary knowledge behind them. #brics #india #bharat #GOI #narendramodi #vegetarian #luxurious #food #foodfascism
184
1,660
102
12,176
735,552
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
Christopher Columbus and Leopold II are responsible for far more deaths than Adolf Hitler. It's not even close. Yet, listening to Europeans, you'd never guess. Aimé Césare explained why: “What [the European] cannot forgive Hitler for is not the crime in itself, the crime against man ... it is the crime against the White man, the humiliation of the White man, and the fact that he applied to Europe colonialist procedures which until then had been reserved exclusively for the Arabs of Algeria, the ‘c*olies’ of India, and the ‘n*ggers’ of Africa.”
98
1,361
31
4,556
104,310
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
Beaucoup s'étonnent que des centaines de scientifiques défendent Nathan Cofnas. Leur argument principal est que la "théorie raciale » de Cofnas concernant l'intelligence ne serait pas scientifique. Les scientifiques défendant Cofnas seraient donc nécessairement des réactionnaires pseudoscientifiques... Cofnas est un philosophe, avec une spécialisation en philosophie de la biologie et en éthique. Il travaille au Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences de l'Ugent. Il n'est pas un scientifique. Si on exige que le travail des philosophes respecte les critères de scientificité, il ne va pas en rester beaucoup dans les universités... En tant que biologiste, je ne suis pas d'accord avec la thèse de Cofnas. Je vais essayer de formuler ça simplement. Les différences individuelles de performance aux tests cognitifs présentent une composante génétique importante. C'est un fait bien établi, même si cela en dérange certains. L'héritabilité de l'intelligence est également documentée. Mais une forte héritabilité au sein d'une population ne permet pas, à elle seule, d'expliquer les différences moyennes éventuellement observées entre populations. Le véritable problème de la thèse de Cofnas est de parler de « races » qu'on pourrait hiérarchiser en termes d'intelligence. Il n'existe pas, chez l'être humain, de races biologiques discrètes et génétiquement homogènes correspondant aux catégories raciales ordinaires. On peut comparer des groupes génétiquement hétérogènes et constater que certains réussissent, en moyenne, moins bien aux tests de QI. Mais ça ne veut pas dire qu'il y a des races moins intelligentes que d'autres. Certains disent que la thèse de Cofnas ne doit plus être débattue dans les universités parce qu'elle serait déjà réfutée depuis des décennies. Je pense que c'est une erreur. La génétique humaine a progressé de manière considérable depuis la démocratisation du séquençage du génome humain. Il me semble donc intéressant de confronter, au sein de l'université, la thèse philosophique de Cofnas avec les données scientifiques actuellement disponibles. Ne pas faire cet exercice serait une grave erreur. Car cela laisserait penser que la thèse de Cofnas est rejetée uniquement pour des raisons morales. Cela reviendrait à lui donner de la crédibilité. Si une thèse est fausse, la meilleure manière de le montrer est de l'examiner sérieusement et de confronter ses arguments aux données disponibles, pas d'empêcher qu'elle soit discutée. Indépendamment de cette question de la véracité de la thèse de Cofnas, la principale raison pour laquelle il faut défendre Cofnas tient aux raisons invoquées par l'UGent pour le licencier. Cofnas ne travaille pas à l'UGent sur sa "théorie raciale". Il fait un postdoc sur un autre projet philosophique. Il a été engagé pour travailler sur ce projet par l'UGent en toute connaissance de cause concernant sa "théorie raciale". Au vu du timing, il est difficile de ne pas mettre sa situation actuelle à l'UGent en relation avec sa dénonciation du caractère frauduleux du travail de Jason Arday. Il est triste qu'Arday se soit donné la mort. Mais Cofnas n'est pas responsable de cela. Arday avait déjà été mis en cause à plusieurs reprises des années auparavant. Si Cambridge avait enquêté sérieusement sur ces accusations, Cofnas n'aurait pas eu à intervenir. La responsabilité de cette situation ne peut donc certainement pas être imputée à Cofnas. Il serait inacceptable qu'un philosophe soit écarté d'une université au motif que ses travaux ou ses opinions mettent certains collègues et étudiants mal à l'aise. Il serat également inacceptable qu'un académique soit écarté pour avoir critiqué le travail d'un autre académique. Si on adopte ces normes, c'en est fini de la liberté académique et de la critique argumentée dans les universités.
107
133
30
640
73,250
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
Another Statistical Exercise in Belittling India's Growth Story 🧵 Increasingly, we are seeing attempts to belittle India’s growth story, even as India continues to beat growth estimates and remains the fastest-growing major economy.
5
90
8
211
18,670
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
The world’s most biodiverse tropical rainforest and peatlands. GOING. 😭 Most deliberately burnt for more palm oil and mining concessions. 😡 Populations of tens of thousands of species including Orangutans just disappearing forever. 🌳🦧❌ You can’t comprehend this devastation!
hampir satu pulau menyala ini🔥
29
2,809
23
6,150
89,728
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
Open the Caraka-Saṃhitā, the foundational text of internal medicine, the one every Ayurveda student still studies and the very 1st thing it does is not introduce Caraka. It opens with a man named Punarvasu Ātreya, teaching 6 students in what was, functionally, the world's oldest documented medical seminar. Ātreya ran a school of medicine at Takṣaśilā, in the 6th century BCE Gandhāra region, the same intellectual hub that would later produce Pāṇini's grammar and draw students from across the subcontinent. Ātreya gathered 6 pupils: Agniveśa, Bhela, Jātūkarṇa, Parāśara, Hārīta, Kṣārapāṇi and taught them everything he knew about disease, the body, and treatment through spoken discourse, the way knowledge traveled before it was reliably written down. Then he did something almost unheard of for a teacher: he turned it into a competition..... Each of his 6 students was told to write down everything they had learned, independently, in the form of a treatise. All 6 manuscripts were then submitted to an assembly of scholars for review. One student's version was judged the clearest, most complete, most useful and it was that student's text, not the teacher's own words, that survived and became the trunk of the tree. That student's name was Agniveśa . His treatise became known as the Agniveśa Saṃhitā/Tantra. Centuries later, a physician named Caraka took Agniveśa's manuscript, revised it, expanded it, and re-edited it into the form we now call the Caraka-Saṃhitā and it is Caraka's name on the spine, Caraka's name in every textbook, Caraka who gets called one of the three fathers of Ayurveda. Ātreya, the actual originator of the ideas, the man who trained the student, who trained the editor, who trained the discipline is barely a footnote outside specialist circles. And it gets stranger still: of the other 5 students who sat in that same classroom, only fragments of one other manuscript, the Bhela saṃhitā survive at all, in a single damaged palm-leaf copy sitting today in a library in Thanjavur, and one lonely surviving page preserved in Berlin. 4 other complete, original treatises on ancient Indian medicine, written by trained physicians in that same founding classroom, are simply gone. :(( Not lost to fire / invasion that we know of....just gone, the ordinary way things vanish when no one keeps copying them. The book everyone reveres remembers the editor. It has almost entirely forgotten the room where the knowledge was actually born.
16
171
2
518
9,191
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
Indonesia is destroying 2,000,000 hectares of one of the world’s most important & biodiverse rainforests in South Papua for sugarcane. 😡 The world’s BIGGEST deforestation project. 🤬 Everyone should be SO angry about this. It is OUR planet and we are losing wildlife forever!
A Papuan cuscus is seen sitting still amid deforestation in Merauke.
184
21,502
170
47,789
739,120
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗞𝗘𝗬: Every Psychiatry resident and attending needs to watch this exchange. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington’s cross-examination of psychiatrist Dr. Jennifer Tufts is a masterclass in why CLINICAL DOCUMENTATION MATTERS. Everyone with an iota of clinical sense understands what she meant, that the patient did not have pressured speech. But a small error in the note gave the defense an opening, and Reddington relentlessly exploited it. You may know exactly what you meant. Your colleagues may know exactly what you meant. But, years later, sitting on a witness stand, the only thing that may matter is what you actually wrote. DOCUMENTATION IS KEY. Words matter. Details matter. Never forget it. #LindsayClancy #MedTwitter
88
88
30
733
260,434
Jagan Mohan R., MD retweeted
funniest you've ever read
45
400
39
5,361
258,938