📹Why is a man with a camara such a big thing to cops but they want flock cameras everywhere? At Hollywood Burbank Airport, California, a man filming planes and public areas from accessible spots was approached by Airport Police Officer John Dohle (Badge #3337) and Officer Jolene Dolan. They demanded ID and questioned why he was filming, citing security concerns. The man refused to ID himself, asserted he was not detained and on public property exercising his rights, and requested their names and badges. No arrest was made. The auditor (johnny five o) originally posted the 2017 interaction online; he claims it contributed to a change in the airport’s photography policy. ❓Does “airport security” give police unlimited power to stop and ID anyone with a camera? ❓Is it reasonable for police to cite 9/11 when someone is simply filming planes from a sidewalk? ❓Why are cameras still triggering overreactions from law enforcement in 2026?

"Based on your future behavior from this point on, you may receive different contact...meaning you may be stopped and identified because you are causing additional alarm and disorder." -- This is cop talk trying to sound authoritative. In Vancouver, Washington, Air Force veteran Mack Worley was openly carrying a slung AR-15 while walking. Open carry is legal in Washington—no permit required for a lawfully possessed long gun, and he wasn’t pointing it or threatening anyone. Police responded to calls with guns drawn. They demanded ID (he refused, citing his rights), temporarily seized the rifle to run the serial number, confirmed it was not stolen, and returned it. They ordered him off private property (nearby Big Al’s restaurant had a no-weapons policy). When he walked toward his car on what he described as a public sidewalk—the direction they didn’t want—he was taken down at gunpoint and arrested for trespassing with a weapon / unlawful display under RCW 9.41.270 (carrying in a manner that warrants alarm). He was charged and initially convicted. That conviction was later overturned on appeal. The court found that simply open-carrying a slung rifle, without threatening conduct, did not automatically meet the “warrants alarm” standard. A subsequent civil-rights lawsuit against the city was dismissed. ❓Did you get the impression from the video that the police didn't like him open carrying so they were going to find a reason to arrest him regardless? ❓Once he was no longer detained why was the officer on the PA speaker giving him commands on which way to walk? ❓Were these officers more concerned with enforcing the law or enforcing their own dislike of him carrying an Ar15?