Except Golwalkar is just one person who led RSS at one point Nehru was PM, elevated to 3 generation, 50+ yr monarchy Historians should have scrutinized hundreds of pages of Nehru being fanboy of Stalin But they did opposite, writing hundreds of pages on 2 lines from Golwalkar

Only history most liberals know is 2 random lines written by Golwalkar in 1939. Open Nehru's "Glimpses of ..." and read how he praises Lenin's mass murder of 5 million Then read how Nehru whitewashes Armenian genocide (1.5 million dead) and Stalin's Holodomor (3 million dead) Only history most liberals know is 2 random lines written by Golwalkar in 1939. Open Nehru's "Glimpses of ..." and read how he praises Lenin's mass murder of 5 million Then read how Nehru whitewashes Armenian genocide (1.5 million dead) and Stalin's Holodomor (3 million dead) 2 other things need to be kept in mind --> Golwalkar wrote in 1939, when much of the Holocaust had not even happened. By contrast, Nehru whitewashed the genocides by Lenin, Stalin and the Ottoman Empire years after these crimes had already happened and were well known. --> The year before 1939, global powers had gathered at Evian in France to discuss the future of the Jews of Germany. At Evian, the US, Britain, France, Canada, Australia, all agreed there was no real reason to act. Imagine blaming Golwalkar for not foreseeing the actions of the Nazis when all the world powers did not see it coming.