Bioinformatician. ex-Whāngārā. New Zealand/Aotearoa. A/Prof. Overly fond of RNA. Kayaking. Fishing.

Ōtepoti - Dunedin, New Zealand
Joined April 2010
Assessing the robustness of human ncRNA notation at HGNC biorxiv.org/cgi/content/shor… #biorxiv_genomic
1
2
785
science.org/content/article/… Time to migrate folks... – at Dunedin City, New Zealand
2
3
427
Postdoc position focused on RNA degradation biology, CRISPR gene editing and Nanopore long read sequencing in my laboratory in Copenhagen: please spread to great candidates. candidate.hr-manager.net/App…
9
1
18
2,394
In 1922, a group of scientists went to the Toronto General Hospital where diabetic children were kept in wards, often 50 or more at a time. Most of them were comatose and dying from diabetic ketoacidosis. Others were being treated by being placed on an extremely strict diet, which inevitably led to starvation. These children were essentially in their death beds, awaiting what was at that time, certain death. The scientists moved swiftly and proceeded to inject the children with a new purified extract of insulin. As they began to inject the last comatose child, the first one to be injected began to wake up. Then one by one, all the children awoke from their diabetic comas. A room that was full of death and gloom, suddenly became a place of joy and hope. In the early 1920s, Frederick Banting and Charles Best discovered insulin under John Macleod at the University of Toronto. With the help of James Collip, insulin was purified, making it available to successfully treat diabetes. Both Banting and Macleod earned Nobel Prizes for their work in 1923. In the same year, Banting, Collip, and Best decided to sell the insulin patent to the University of Toronto for $1. Banting famously went on to say, "Insulin does not belong to me, it belongs to the world."
404
3,529
341
20,827
1,358,968
People usually think replication attempts in science are rare. Journals don't publish replications, so scientists don't do them. In reality there are countless replication attempts (and failures), it's just PhD students assume they did something wrong journals.plos.org/plosone/ar…
31
289
63
1,479
434,468
Researchers find nearly 30% of papers “that stated significances (or their absence) are based on the presence of a single influential data point.” biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/…
5
53
10
168
23,087
Early bird registration closes Tue 5th November #OHA2024 The 10th #OneHealth Aotearoa Symposium 📅3-4 December 2024 📍University of Otago Wellington 💻#AntimicrobialResistance, climate change, Te Ao Māori & more! Link: otago.ac.nz/conference/one-h…
3
14
1
14
1,899
In a world of everlarger datasets and accessible ML/AI I would expect #biocurators of reliable & robust to be in high demand. Curious to know if this is reflected at Genbank/ENA, PDB, GEO, PRIDE, Rfam, Pfam, etc.
2
242
New Zealand Geographic has been an icon of environmental journalism for 35 years, but times are changing, and we need your help to survive. nzgeo.com/stories/we-need-yo… 🧵(1/3)
3
29
6
57
11,248
I'm off to learn Thai -- English is already too hectic for me.
All languages covey information at a similar rate when spoken (39bits/s). Languages that are spoken faster have less information density per syllable! One of the coolest results in linguistics.
1
365
I'll reject excessive extrapolations from limited data very quickly! – at Dunedin City, New Zealand
All rejected papers share one common flaw: a weak discussion section. I know because I used to write them too. If you're stuck on the discussion section, wondering how to tie it all together, this is for you:
1
397
Nowhere. It doesn’t appear on any maps I’ve looked at recently.
Which country is this as seen from space?
132
35
9
717
50,315
🧵 Bioinformatics faces a critical challenge: despite its importance, software quality often falls short due to the lack of proper development practices. In our latest paper, we advocate for improving software quality in bioinformatics through teamwork. doi.org/10.1093/bioinformati…
3
47
8
181
24,015
The punishment for science misconduct is …. nothing. All these men are still running labs / paid professors.
List of high-level Alzheimer's researchers accused of credible fraud:🧵 #1 - Marc Tessier-Lavigne Genentech pointed out problems in his 2009 Nature paper in 2012. After an expose by @tab_delete, he had to resign from Stanford Presidency, but can still run lab and do research.
52
825
45
3,853
446,185
💥💥💥New preprint 💥💥💥on the EuPRI resource. Where we reconstruct the motifs for 34,736 RBPs and study their function and evolution. Joint work with @ProfTimHughes (Toronto), Matt Weirauch, @LXandR_, Deb Ray, Kaitlin Laverty and many more. More details to come
Reconstructing the sequence specificities of RNA-binding proteins across eukaryotes biorxiv.org/cgi/content/shor… #biorxiv_genomic
2
16
50
6,785
For just 2% of GDP we can make significant progress on all of NZ's major challenges: economy, health, transport, inequality, education, ... an absolute bargain! @MBIEsci @NZNationalParty @nzlabour @nzscientists #GrowGERD – at Dunedin City, New Zealand
3
6
473
Not too late to submit an abstract to #crispr2025 meeting in NZ! Please share! We can’t wait to see all you crispr enthusiasts in Christchurch.
Deadline Extension for Abstract Submissions Good news! The deadline for abstract submissions has been extended to Monday 28 October. This is your chance to showcase your research by submitting either an oral or poster presentation for CRISPR 2025. #crispr #crispr2025 #phage
21
22
5,064
The Department of Computational Biology at Cornell is seeking applicants for a new faculty member to serve as departmental chair! academicjobsonline.org/ajo/j…
21
30
5,182