Pinned Tweet
Peer-reviewed & published! Work with @ModuloJames @steph_mcgimpsey F. Ashari-Ghomi, @sinanugur @aleksandrana @AGbioDS & @mikblacknz
genomebiology.biomedcentral.… 1/n
Paul Gardner retweeted
Assessing the robustness of human ncRNA notation at HGNC biorxiv.org/cgi/content/shor… #biorxiv_genomic
science.org/content/article/…
Time to migrate folks... – at Dunedin City, New Zealand
Paul Gardner retweeted
Postdoc position focused on RNA degradation biology, CRISPR gene editing and Nanopore long read sequencing in my laboratory in Copenhagen: please spread to great candidates. candidate.hr-manager.net/App…
Paul Gardner retweeted
In 1922, a group of scientists went to the Toronto General Hospital where diabetic children were kept in wards, often 50 or more at a time. Most of them were comatose and dying from diabetic ketoacidosis. Others were being treated by being placed on an extremely strict diet, which inevitably led to starvation.
These children were essentially in their death beds, awaiting what was at that time, certain death. The scientists moved swiftly and proceeded to inject the children with a new purified extract of insulin.
As they began to inject the last comatose child, the first one to be injected began to wake up. Then one by one, all the children awoke from their diabetic comas. A room that was full of death and gloom, suddenly became a place of joy and hope.
In the early 1920s, Frederick Banting and Charles Best discovered insulin under John Macleod at the University of Toronto. With the help of James Collip, insulin was purified, making it available to successfully treat diabetes. Both Banting and Macleod earned Nobel Prizes for their work in 1923.
In the same year, Banting, Collip, and Best decided to sell the insulin patent to the University of Toronto for $1.
Banting famously went on to say, "Insulin does not belong to me, it belongs to the world."
Paul Gardner retweeted
People usually think replication attempts in science are rare. Journals don't publish replications, so scientists don't do them.
In reality there are countless replication attempts (and failures), it's just PhD students assume they did something wrong
journals.plos.org/plosone/ar…
Paul Gardner retweeted
Researchers find nearly 30% of papers “that stated significances (or their absence) are based on the presence of a single influential data point.”
biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/…
Paul Gardner retweeted
Early bird registration closes Tue 5th November #OHA2024
The 10th #OneHealth Aotearoa Symposium
📅3-4 December 2024
📍University of Otago Wellington
💻#AntimicrobialResistance, climate change, Te Ao Māori & more!
Link: otago.ac.nz/conference/one-h…
This looks like another poor ML method. No mention of correcting for seq similarity when splitting data & no mention of negative data (e.g. shuffled or non-genic). No wonder the accuracy metrics look impressive.
doi.org/10.1093/bioinformati…
In a world of everlarger datasets and accessible ML/AI I would expect #biocurators of reliable & robust to be in high demand. Curious to know if this is reflected at Genbank/ENA, PDB, GEO, PRIDE, Rfam, Pfam, etc.
Paul Gardner retweeted
New Zealand Geographic has been an icon of environmental journalism for 35 years, but times are changing, and we need your help to survive.
nzgeo.com/stories/we-need-yo…
🧵(1/3)
Paul Gardner retweeted
"Studies from around the world show bike lanes ease congestion, reduce emissions and are a boon to businesses"
cbc.ca/news/science/bike-lan…
I'll reject excessive extrapolations from limited data very quickly! – at Dunedin City, New Zealand
All rejected papers share one common flaw: a weak discussion section.
I know because I used to write them too.
If you're stuck on the discussion section,
wondering how to tie it all together,
this is for you:

ALT Annotated parts of the discussion section: big summary/ importance statement for the science, scientific findings as extension of previous work, findings' scientific implications, how this engineering will facilitate future research, forward-looking statements about the field as a whole, a summary/importance of the engineering aspect of the work, how it facilitates scientific research, limitations of the platform show which questions would be unanswered, how it will facilitated medical research.
Paul Gardner retweeted
🧵 Bioinformatics faces a critical challenge: despite its importance, software quality often falls short due to the lack of proper development practices.
In our latest paper, we advocate for improving software quality in bioinformatics through teamwork.
doi.org/10.1093/bioinformati…
Paul Gardner retweeted
The punishment for science misconduct is …. nothing. All these men are still running labs / paid professors.
List of high-level Alzheimer's researchers accused of credible fraud:🧵
#1 - Marc Tessier-Lavigne
Genentech pointed out problems in his 2009 Nature paper in 2012. After an expose by @tab_delete, he had to resign from Stanford Presidency, but can still run lab and do research.
Paul Gardner retweeted
💥💥💥New preprint 💥💥💥on the EuPRI resource. Where we reconstruct the motifs for 34,736 RBPs and study their function and evolution.
Joint work with @ProfTimHughes (Toronto), Matt Weirauch, @LXandR_, Deb Ray, Kaitlin Laverty and many more. More details to come
Reconstructing the sequence specificities of RNA-binding proteins across eukaryotes biorxiv.org/cgi/content/shor… #biorxiv_genomic
For just 2% of GDP we can make significant progress on all of NZ's major challenges: economy, health, transport, inequality, education, ... an absolute bargain! @MBIEsci @NZNationalParty @nzlabour @nzscientists #GrowGERD – at Dunedin City, New Zealand
Paul Gardner retweeted
Not too late to submit an abstract to #crispr2025 meeting in NZ! Please share! We can’t wait to see all you crispr enthusiasts in Christchurch.
Deadline Extension for Abstract Submissions
Good news! The deadline for abstract submissions has been extended to Monday 28 October. This is your chance to showcase your research by submitting either an oral or poster presentation for CRISPR 2025.
#crispr #crispr2025 #phage
Paul Gardner retweeted
The Department of Computational Biology at Cornell is seeking applicants for a new faculty member to serve as departmental chair! academicjobsonline.org/ajo/j…





























