Pawl Baxter retweeted
This is not my theory. This is theirs.
Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan — the two most cited scholars in the color revolution field — studied 323 regime change campaigns. Their finding:
Security force defections make campaigns FORTY-SIX TIMES more likely to succeed.
Pawl Baxter retweeted
🧵 THREAD: The true reason Pete Hegseth is being targeted is because he's standing between President Trump and a coup
@PeteHegseth named the institutions... CFR, Brookings, the general class... in 37 seconds in a video by @Liz_Wheeler . Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color revolution planning document cited him as an insider threat.
They didn't go after him because of drinking. They didn't go after him because of women. They went after him because every color revolution manual ever written says the same thing: you cannot topple a government unless the security forces defect. And a loyal Secretary of Defense is the one person who makes sure they don't.
I have the receipts. Their own documents. Their own training sessions. Their own words on camera.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇
Pawl Baxter retweeted
THE LAST GATE
You may be wondering why there has been a full on attack against the War Department the past couple of years. Coupled with disturbing reports of communists planning some form of uprising, and the picture becomes clearer. Let's break it down so you can remain vigilant:
If you want to break a republic without rolling tanks down Pennsylvania Avenue, you don't start with the center of power. You start with the men who guard it.
That's the part people still don't seem to understand. The street is noise. The NGOs are scaffolding. The lawyers give the thing language. None of it matters if the military still answers to lawful civilian authority.
So you work the force.
You teach officers to distrust the chain. Telling them obedience is weakness and resistance is conscience. You turn every single hard order into a moral emergency. Making hesitation sound noble. You make defiance sound constitutional. You scare them, saying they'll be investigated. Sound familiar?
You don't need a coup in the old sense. You just need enough men in uniform to decide that elected authority is optional.
And that is why the position of Secretary of War matters so much.
If Pete Hegseth is seen by communists as the man who won't let that break happen, then of course the pressure lands on him. You don't waste time pounding on a wall if there's one hinge holding the gate shut. You go after the hinge.
Because if the Secretary of War is weak and the generals begin deciding for themselves which lawful presidential orders deserve obedience, then the republic has a problem far bigger than whoever is SECWAR.
At that point, the uniform is no longer serving the Constitution through civilian command. It's becoming its own political authority. That's what every red revolution wants.
That's how republics die from the inside. Not always with gunfire. Sometimes with memos, hesitation, professional pressure, and men convincing themselves that disobedience is virtue.
History is full of governments that thought the military was loyal right up until the hour it wasn't. That's the lesson.
You don’t have to seize the state if you can teach the men with guns to stop obeying it. Once that happens, the Constitution is just paper under glass.
The republic is then over. What comes next is whoever controls the rifles. Don't take it up with me, take it up with history.
No retreat. No compromise. And certainly no surrender. The hour is late. And this is all far more consequential than petty politics.
🧵 THREAD: The true reason Pete Hegseth is being targeted is because he's standing between President Trump and a coup
@PeteHegseth named the institutions... CFR, Brookings, the general class... in 37 seconds in a video by @Liz_Wheeler . Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color revolution planning document cited him as an insider threat.
They didn't go after him because of drinking. They didn't go after him because of women. They went after him because every color revolution manual ever written says the same thing: you cannot topple a government unless the security forces defect. And a loyal Secretary of Defense is the one person who makes sure they don't.
I have the receipts. Their own documents. Their own training sessions. Their own words on camera.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇
Pawl Baxter retweeted
Let me break down what I'm seeing and hearing here from DR.
I don't know DR's source for these materials , but they appear completely legit and are profoundly disturbing.
These are leading members of the Democrat Party hatching up the following strategy:
1. After the midterms, use the DSA to incite and carry out violent civil unrest.
2. Make the violent civil unrest so bad that Trump must invoke the Insurrection Act.
3. Use the invocation of the Insurrection Act to create a national sense of illegitimacy whereby Democrat governors appear justified in taking the extreme action of refusing to acknowledge federal authority and push to form a new form of federal government via various means, including an Article V transformation of the Constitution.
Maybe there is more to this and it's not as bad as it seems, but right now this appears to be a conspiracy to create the next Fort Sumter.
This is a CIA-style color revolution in real time, on our own soil.
(Of course the legacy media is nowhere near this--it takes us Internet randos to get the word out.)
The past few days, I got my hands on thousands of new transcripts and hundreds of recordings, thanks to leads from @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan .
You've heard that the DSA is proposing structural reforms to America, including abolishing the Senate and imposing term limits.
What you not have heard is - there is an operational plan to put it all into action. If the Democratic Party sweeps 2026, then DSA will become "foot soldiers" in constant clashes with the administration to cross a "red line" or invoke a "doomsday scenario" - meaning, President Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, probably sometime in 2027.
Then, a lot of coordinated responses kick off, including delegitimizing the federal government itself and handing that legitimacy to Democratic governors. 2028 then becomes a vote on whether to keep America governance as-is or to burn it all down to appease a "young and brown" demographic.
The mysterious group who's been coordinating 50501, Indivisible, and coordinating the NoKings protests is called "United Democracy Alliance" and their intellectual leader is Erica Chenoweth who came up with the 3.5% rule of nonviolent regime change.
Patience. I know I've hyped this more than anything else. It's genuinely the biggest discovery I've had. This is an enormous archive. This is only the beginning.
Pawl Baxter retweeted
Starlink slowed down for a couple days in Ukraine so a bunch of Europeans and a bunch of Democrats have declared that Elon Musk is the most evil person to ever live.
"Elon is the worst human being ever."
"As soon as our technology catches up to Elon's, we will boycott his products!"
"SpaceX and Starlink are dead!"
Look at you fools go. All because Elon allegedly didn't do everything in his power to help Ukraine.
Wait until you dumb f*cks hear about your hero, Barack Obama.
After Putin annexed Crimea and moved 30,000 troops to the Ukrainian border, Obama refused to give Ukraine weapons to defend itself. And he refused for years.
Surely you Ukraine fans remember that right?
Surely you remember the President of Ukraine standing before Congress, begging for weapons to defend Ukraine. You must because you all love Ukraine.
Surely you remember Obama's speech in 2014 at the NATO summit. If you don't, you should watch Fox News because they are currently playing my video of his speech.
During his speech Obama said that Russia was a regional power that posed no threat to America, even after Putin invaded part of Ukraine.
How could that be? We are told now that if Putin takes Ukraine, he could take the entire world. Was Obama lying back then? Impossible, Obama is incapable of that.
During that same speech Obama also said that Ukraine should work out its own future and that many Ukrainians in fact had allegiance to Russia. Obama said that countries regularly break international law and that it wasn't our problem. How could he say that?
Obama sounded like "Putin's Puppet" right? You fans of Ukraine must be so angry at Obama.
Here's a video of the Ukrainian President begging before Congress for weapons after Putin took Crimea.
Say it you Ukraine lovers. Say that Obama is worse than Elon Musk. Will you? Nah. You all are frauds.
Also included in the video is Biden in 2018 being asked about the fact that Trump gave Ukraine the weapons to defend itself that Obama would not. Biden said that he agreed with Trump and that he had spent years arguing to Obama to supply Ukraine those same weapons.
Come on Ukraine fans. Speak out about Obama like you do about Elon and Trump. 😜
The welfare cliff does not trap poor families by accident.
Congress engineered a benefits system where earning one additional dollar can trigger simultaneous cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, housing vouchers, and childcare subsidies, collapsing your effective income by $5 or more. The government built a cage, and somehow we call it a safety net.
Take a single mother in Houston. She earns $22,000 annually and qualifies for $35,000 in combined federal and state benefits. She gets a raise to $25,000. That $3,000 in new wages costs her $18,000 in benefits. Her employer rewarded her productivity; the state punished her for it. No rational actor climbs that wall.
This is price control, but applied to human ambition. Every welfare threshold functions as a marginal tax rate that would make a Scandinavian bureaucrat jealous, often exceeding 80 or even 100 percent on the next dollar earned. This disincentive is the system's core mechanism.
Dependency concentrates political power. Families tethered to benefit rolls vote to protect those rolls, and the politicians who administer the programs vote to expand them. The cliff self-perpetuates. Free market economists have traced this perverse incentive structure for decades, but the administrative state expands regardless, because a bureaucracy that manages poverty also survives by it.
Genuine exit from poverty requires accumulating capital, building skills, and taking calculated risks. The welfare cliff taxes all three.
France. Is. Burning.
🚨 JUST IN: While France burns, Polish Member of European Parliament Dominik Tarczynski is WALKING THROUGH Krakow LATE at night, showing all of Europe it's PERFECTLY CALM
"Look how safe we are. Churches are safe. Because we did not let them in. Zero means zero. 'Be like Poland' means be brave." 🇵🇱🇺🇸
"We know what jihadists are capable of. We do not know what second or third generation of so-called refugees will do. Well, actually we do know... we can see what is happening in France."
There are no riots, no burning buildings and no police lines
Poland refused the EU's migrant relocation quotas, and the EU's top court ruled against it. Poland didn't budge!
In the same 24 hours, France's major streets and businesses are burning and being ransacked by leftists, Islamists and invaders
EVERY NATION CAN BE LIKE THIS. It's a matter of CHOICE
Pawl Baxter retweeted
الست الفرنسية المزهولة دي .. عضوة في حزب اليسار الفرنسي وناشطة من اكبر دعاة فتح الهجرة لشعوب شمال افريقيا وبتدافع عنهم كل مايعملوا مصيبة وكارثة وتتهم الأخرين اللي عايزين يوقفوا طوفان الهمج دول بالعنصرية ...
هي عندها محل شيك صغير في مكان راقي وقفت في محلها تحاول تنقذه من النهب والسرقة وعشان هي ناشطة مشهورة
بتقولهم انا فلانة الناشطة بتاعة اللجوء انا معاكوا انا دافعت عنكم وعن دخولكم و بقائكم في فرنسا زقوها وقعوها وداسوا عليها بأقدامهم كويس انها لسه حية
ونهبوا المحل كله الست بقت علي الحديدة خسرت كل كفاح وشغل عمرها في لحظة ..
واقفة مذهولة مش مصدقة ان اللصوص الغوغاء المجرمين البرابرة دول هما اللي طول عمرها بتدافع عنهم وعن انهم يغزوا بلدها ويخربوه
عشان شهرتها في الدفاع عن لاجئين شمال افريقيا كل الميديا الفرنسية امبارح جايبة قصتها وصورتها قدام محلها المنهوب شقي عمرها كله وهي مش مصدقة مدي غبائها اللي وصل فرنسا للخراب والدمار ده كله 😢
Pawl Baxter retweeted
The heart attack was first described in a medical journal in 1912, and the man who described it had trouble finding a second case.
Doctors had been opening chests for 300 years. They had dissected kings, paupers, drunks and the obese, and the blocked coronary artery was a rarity you wrote up.
A young Boston cardiologist started practising in 1911. He later said he did not see his first heart attack patient until 1921, and then they came in a flood.
By 1950 it was the biggest killer in the United States. By 1960, in Britain.
Victorian England ate butter, dripping, suet, bacon and cream, and smoked like a chimney, and the coronary ward did not exist.
The Masai lived on milk, meat and blood, and the doctors who went looking in the 1960s could not find heart disease among them.
So what arrived between the dissecting rooms of 1900 and the coronary care units of 1960?
Crisco launched in 1911. Cottonseed oil hardened into a block that looked like lard.
Margarine followed it into every kitchen.
By 1960 a quarter of American fat came out of a seed press that had not existed in 1900.
The seed oil goes into your blood on the LDL particle. It is the part of the particle that oxidises. The oxidised particle is what the artery wall takes in.
The cholesterol was in the butter for a thousand years and the artery stayed open.
Then the fat changed, and a disease nobody had heard of became the way most people die.
The guideline blames the butter. The butter has an alibi going back to the Bronze Age.
Pawl Baxter retweeted
I honestly do not understand how any American who is not already a literal Communist or a literal Jihadist could vote Democrat after hearing what Slotkin said below.
This is LITERALLY totalitarianism. It's not the fake "fascism" the Left likes to accuse the Right of, it is the REAL THING.
Undeniably.
Irrefutably.
This is a sitting member of Congress who was in the CIA saying that dissent from what she believes will result in imprisonment.
This is straight out of Solzhenitsyn. Straight out of Orwell. This is something an early Nazi would have said in 1932 under the Weimar Republic.
Please please PLEASE share her words with everyone you know. The Democrat/Media Complex will try to bury this. It is up to us on social media, on blogs and via texts and emails to get the word out.
The only way to stop these monsters is to make sure that voters who don't really keep up on politics understand the actual threat, see it with their own eyes and hear it with their own ears.
Please. Spread the word to anyone who will listen. And even those who won't listen.
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Pawl Baxter retweeted
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Pawl Baxter retweeted
To every American, and to everyone watching France burn from abroad:
Do not blame the French people for this.
We never asked for it. We never voted for it. And the one time we were clearly asked, we said no.
Here are the numbers your media won't show you.
70% of the French say there are too many immigrants in France today.
79% want a tougher immigration policy.
77% disapprove of the government's record on immigration.
83% want foreign criminals and long-term unemployed foreigners sent home.
And no, it's not just the old. 69% of French 18 to 24 year olds support suspending legal immigration for three years.
This is not a fringe. This is the French people.
In 2005, we were asked if we wanted the European Constitution. 55% voted no. Three years later, our politicians passed the same text under another name, through parliament, without ever asking us again.
That is modern France in one sentence. The people say no. The elites do it anyway.
So who is responsible? The politicians who lied to us. A class of leaders formed in the same schools, the same forums, the same networks, loyal to each other before they are loyal to their nations.
In 2017, at Harvard, Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, bragged about his Young Global Leaders program in four words: "We penetrate the cabinets." He added that it was true in France. Emmanuel Macron was one of his Young Global Leaders.
It's the same project in Brussels with Ursula von der Leyen and in Paris with Macron. Borders treated as an obstacle. Nations treated as relics. The people treated as a problem to be managed.
What you are watching in France is not the French people failing. It is the end of the globalist project, an abject, quasi-communist dream of a world run by unelected planners. It is collapsing everywhere in Europe at once, and the West has to cut this cancer out before it takes the rest of the body with it.
The peoples of Europe don't want this. They never did.
So when you see our town halls burning, don't say "the French chose this."
The French never chose this.
They were forced into it.
If you're French and you agree, repost this so the world hears it from us.
If you're American, look at us carefully. Then choose differently on November 3rd.
Pawl Baxter retweeted
History remembers Marie Antoinette through the lens of one of the world's first documented coordinated fake news campaign.
Born an Austrian Archduchess in Vienna in 1755 and married at fourteen to the future King Louis XVI, the last Queen of France became the primary target of the radical Jacobins, the ideological ancestors of the modern political left. You have likely heard that when told the French peasants had no bread, she callously sneered, "Let them eat cake." That is a complete fabrication. The philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau penned that exact phrase in 1765 when Marie Antoinette was a nine-year-old child living in Austria. In reality, when grain shortages hit France, she personally wrote to her family about her moral obligation to aid the suffering working class and sold off royal assets to purchase grain for the poor.
The truth of who Marie Antoinette really was emerged during her darkest hour in October 1793. Following the violent overthrow of the monarchy and the execution of her husband, the radical revolutionary government locked her in a damp, stone cell in the Conciergerie prison. Her hair had turned entirely white from grief, her health was failing, and the state had seized her children. Determined to annihilate her reputation before sending her to the guillotine, the state prosecutor and radical propagandist Jacques Hébert orchestrated a show trial where the guilty verdict was already guaranteed.
Because the state lacked actual evidence of treason, the radicals resorted to psychological monstrosity. They isolated her eight-year-old son, manipulated the terrified boy, and coerced him into signing a fabricated statement accusing his own mother of horrific physical abuse. When Hébert proudly read this grotesque lie aloud in the packed courtroom, expecting the bloodthirsty crowd to erupt in cheers, the Queen remained utterly silent, staring straight ahead in stunned disbelief.
The presiding judge demanded to know why she refused to answer the accusation. Slowly, the frail, widowed Queen rose from her chair. She ignored the corrupt prosecutors entirely and turned to face the gallery, which was packed with furious revolutionary women who had come to jeer at her demise. With a voice steady with maternal dignity, she declared, "If I have not replied, it is because Nature itself refuses to respond to such a charge laid against a mother. I appeal to all mothers who may be present in this room!"
A stunned, heavy silence fell over the courtroom. The radical women in the gallery, who moments earlier were screaming for her blood, began to weep in sympathy. The moral clarity of a mother defending natural law shattered the state's propaganda in a single breath. When Maximilien Robespierre, the architect of the Reign of Terror, heard what happened at dinner that evening, he was so furious that he shattered his plate on the table, cursing Hébert as an idiot for turning the Queen into a figure of public sympathy. Two days later, she walked to the scaffold with unbroken composure and deep Christian faith; when she accidentally stepped on the executioner's foot, her final words on earth were a polite, "Pardon me, sir, I did not do it on purpose."
The tragedy of Marie Antoinette is the ultimate blueprint for how the radical left operates today. The French Revolution literally gave birth to the political term "Left-wing," and their playbook has remained unchanged for over two centuries. When radicals seek to tear down Western tradition, faith, and sovereignty, they begin with a relentless media smear campaign to dehumanize their opponents. Next, they weaponize the justice system, staging political show trials to destroy anyone standing in the way of the regime. Finally, they attack the nuclear family itself, turning children against their own parents in service to the state. Yet Marie Antoinette’s final stand proves an eternal truth that conservatives still hold sacred today: when you stand firm on faith, family, and natural law, even the most vicious ideological mob cannot strip away your dignity.
Pawl Baxter retweeted
Bamboo sheets are sold as the gentle alternative to cotton and silk, and the fabric they are made of is the one that put factory workers in asylums.
Bamboo cloth is not bamboo. It is viscose. The plant is pulped, dissolved in caustic soda and carbon disulphide, and squirted through a nozzle into acid, where it sets into a thread. It was patented in England in 1892 as artificial silk, and the trade name for it was rayon. The same process makes a kitchen sponge and the cellophane on a bunch of flowers.
Carbon disulphide was already notorious. French doctors in the 1850s had watched it send rubber workers blind, impotent and insane. The viscose industry needed it in enormous quantities and nothing else would do.
So from the 1920s the asylums began to fill. In 1933 a doctor at a Pennsylvania rayon plant wired Alice Hamilton, the first woman on the Harvard faculty and the country's authority on industrial poisons, with a 6-word message: an epidemic of insanity has broken out. Workers were going home and attacking their wives. Men in the churn rooms were found wandering the roads. Investigators who got inside found a third of the workforce showing signs of poisoning.
The companies fixed prices, sat on the evidence, and when the regulators finally came for them in the West they moved the factories to India, China and Indonesia, where the same chemical is used today. The consumer was never harmed. Only the people who made the cloth.
Silk is made by a caterpillar in a mulberry tree. Wool is made by a sheep in a field. Both are a protein, same as your own hair, and both have been pulled off the animal for 5,000 years without sending anybody out of his mind.
The fake silk needed a chemical that could not be made safe, and the industry's answer was to make it somewhere else.
Pawl Baxter retweeted
For twelve hundred years the Japanese were forbidden to eat meat, and the rich got round it by calling a wild boar a whale.
The ban was issued by an emperor in the year 675 and renewed by every ruler who wanted to look devout. Cattle, horses, dogs, chickens, monkeys: forbidden. The religion said that a man might come back as the ox he had eaten. The state said the ox was needed for the plough. The peasant who killed one was polluted for a hundred and fifty days and could be punished by the magistrate, and the rule held, with gaps, until 1872.
But nobody with money went without. Wild game was quietly outside the edict, so venison became "momiji", maple leaf, and horse became "sakura", cherry blossom. Boar was "botan", peony, when it was on the plate, and "yama kujira", mountain whale, when it was in the shop, because whales were fish and fish was permitted. Edo had rows of mountain-whale shops. The samurai ate venison in winter "as medicine", on a doctor's note, a practice with its own name, kusurigui, and the great lords sent the shogun a yearly gift of beef pickled in sake with a label on the barrel that read "medicine".
So the poor kept the law and the rich kept a pharmacy.
When the emperor finally ate beef in public to mark the new year of 1872, ten monks with swords broke into the palace to stop him, and some of them were killed on the steps. The emperor ate on. Within a generation beef production had grown thirteen times, and the farm oxen whose ancestors had been protected for a millennium became the most expensive beef on earth.
A country's whole relationship with meat was a lie told by the people at the top, in a vocabulary of flowers, for a thousand years.
Pawl Baxter retweeted
Bernadette was missing how Sheldon gives zero fucks about money. hed throw away millions for the cool plaque
Pawl Baxter retweeted
Caleb Hammer completely unloads on a Louisiana couple after learning their $100,000 household is collecting $500 a month in FOOD STAMPS.
That’s $6,000/year in TAX-FREE income.
HAMMER: “That PISSES me off.”
That $6,000 cushion is exactly what lets them blow $3,600 a year eating out.
Taxpayers cover the groceries so they can hit the restaurants.
Hammer was so disgusted he stopped talking to them and started ranting under his breath, while the couple sat frozen in stunned silence.
Maybe everyone gaming the system should have to sit across from a taxpayer and explain themselves.
Something tells me the look on Hammer’s face will haunt them the next time they eat out.
Pawl Baxter retweeted
The woman who taught Britain to cook on rations lived to 99, and the one thing she told the nation never to do was throw away the fat.
Marguerite Patten was 24 when the war started and had been cooking for her family since her father died when she was 12. The Ministry of Food hired her. Her job was to go out to the factory canteens and the market squares with a demonstration stove and show a tired country how to make a dinner out of what the ration book allowed.
Then she went on the wireless. The Kitchen Front, 5 minutes every morning after the news, with 7 million people listening. She was the voice that got a generation of mothers through the war.
Here is what she actually taught. Save every scrap of dripping and use it for everything. Render the fat off the bacon. Keep the bones for stock. Make the meat ration go round with suet puddings and pies. She loathed the whale meat the Ministry made her demonstrate, and said so for the rest of her life.
That generation came out of 14 years of rationing healthier than the one before it. The children were taller, the teeth were better, and nobody was fat.
After the war she became the first cook on British television and wrote 170 books that sold 17 million copies. She refused the words celebrity chef to the end. She was a home economist, she said, and would die one.
She died in 2015, aged 99, having outlived every diet fad of the century she had cooked through.
Her advice was never about restriction. It was that the fat is the food, and a country that pours it away is wasting the best part of the animal. She was right in 1942 and she is right now.



























