Everyone is making their own list. I only use these 3 @NousResearch @DeepSeekHarness

I shipped PlugICT for a simple study problem: you remember the ICT idea, but not where it was explained. Ask in plain English, review the source lesson, then verify the timestamp yourself. That boundary matters.

When you get stuck on liquidity, is the problem the concept or finding ICT's original explanation? I built PlugICT to search the lessons by question and point you to the relevant timestamp. Which side slows you down?

ICT study loop: 1. Name the question. 2. Find the source lesson. 3. Check the timestamp. 4. Replay the idea on a chart. I built PlugICT for step 2.

If I were starting ICT again, I would not begin with a giant playlist. I would pick one concept, search for the original lesson, and replay it on a chart. One question at a time.

Give your next ICT question 60 seconds before opening five tabs. Write the question in plain English, find the source lesson, then study the relevant timestamp. I built PlugICT for that first step.

I used to save ICT notes in screenshots, bookmarks, and half-finished docs. Then I could not find the one I needed. I built PlugICT around a simpler loop: ask, find the lesson, check the timestamp. What do you lose most often, notes or the source?

Thought experiment: you remember the ICT idea, but not the lesson. A useful study loop is question, source lesson, timestamp, chart replay. Which step do you skip most?

Dear beginner: stop watching video #47. Go back to liquidity. And keep the source searchable. plugict.com

Before: 30 minutes searching for a lesson. After: 30 seconds. Same student. Same chart. Different workflow. plugict.com

"ICT is just repackaged concepts." Maybe. But can you find where he said it first? That's the debate PlugICT helps you have properly. plugict.com

My brain during a session: "I know this. I KNOW this. Where is it from?" My bookmarks folder: 400 videos, zero answers. plugict.com