Typical guy. I'm not special, but sometimes I feel like I am.

Joined September 2012
No country should ever give its hard earned rights to anybody who hasn't proven they should exist there. Being born to foreign parents on our magic soil is not good enough. It makes me sad thinking that we might be in the middle of a slow decline with the best years behind us.
The actual “birthright” belongs to my children, and the children of all real Americans. They have a birthright to live in a country that resembles the one our ancestors established. And now that birthright, the only true birthright, has been destroyed in favor of the imagined “birthright” of children born to parents who don’t even belong in this country and who have no ancestral or cultural ties to it whatsoever. Total madness. Suicide. Words cannot describe how evil this is.
1
38
The liberals never ask, "Why are these nations unable to provide basic, heavily-subsidized goods and services? Why has $2.6 trillion in foreign aid failed to improve conditions in most of Africa?" They don't want to grapple with the answer, so they come up with "post-colonialism" and arguments like "they couldn't fill the ambulance with gas, therefore Elon is a mass murderer." The actual truth would be unbearable.
190
366
64
4,149
777,591
Keith Spot retweeted
Almost all non-white people are tribal This means they don’t have an internal Jiminy Cricket telling them right from wrong (guilt) Their morality is external and is connected to their tribe (honour/shame) Put simply: ‘Right’ means something is good for their tribe. ‘Wrong’ means something is bad for their tribe. So for Sikhs, Henry Nowak’s murder was only bad because it gave their tribe some bad press. We saw this in their reactions. None of them lost any sleep over Henry dying. For Muslims/Pakistanis, they don’t care about the victims of the rape gangs. They only care if the reporting of these crimes makes Muslims/Pakistanis look bad (see Mehdi Hasan). This group is so tribal, in fact, and so connected as a community that many (if not most) of them would have known exactly what was happening. We’re easily talking hundreds of thousands of them that knew yet none of them called the police. Why? Because that would have been bad for their tribe. In their honour/shame based morality, turning a blind eye to the industrial rape and torture of children was the right thing to do. This tribalism extends to: Nepotism Collectivism Low trust in out-groups Revenge/feud cycles Corruption Fraud Etc So where does this leave White people? We find ourselves in a Richard Dawkins style evolutionary game theory experiment. Our homelands have been flooded with highly-tribal groups but we are no longer tribal. We have lost our natural defence mechanisms and this is a zero-sum game… Either White people become tribal again or we go extinct.
Ask yourself why the world’s richest man is amplifying an anti-Muslim thug and convicted criminal in the UK just days after an alleged anti-Muslim terror attack in the UK (which Musk hasn’t mentioned, let alone condemned).
77
592
34
3,024
69,517
Keith Spot retweeted
Call me a monster. I don’t care. If you walk outside of your house and somebody is breaking into your car, I fully believe you should be able to shoot them dead on the spot. I value my property over the lives of scumbag thieves.
916
1,783
132
25,136
387,240
He's right, and here's the calculations. Historical intuition executed horse thieves. They were right as well. Though the damage appears to only be the cost of a horse, the overall 2nd order costs add up to far exceed the value of the person's life. Even a mere porch-pirate taking an Amazon box compels thousands, perhaps even millions bc of social media, to preventively invest real money and time to buy and install ring doorbells, cameras, locks, anti-theft delivery boxes, fumble with keys, use PO boxes, etc. If the thief was required to pay these costs currently paid by, say, the closest 1,000 neighboring homeowners - which only exist bc of their threat - it would be in the $100,000s range, PER INSTANCE. Most thieves don't even have that net worth. They can't offer anything other than the end of their threat: execution. We should be executing perhaps 100x as many criminals. A recent case of a man being charged for shooting at thieves fleeing his garage, who had stolen stuff 2x recently shows the naive, corrupt and treasonous rot in the judiciary, straying from this scientific calculation of costs, and the traditional intuition that build this consensus. The female judge said the defendant "put himself into this situation." Others say his life wasn't at risk. Wrong. His life was being taken from him if he did nothing. He spent time out of his finite life, to obtain these items. Their value is inseparable from him. Their loss - of which police have no legal duty to reimburse for failure to protect/reacquire - is measurable loss of his life. The man is no threat to anyone in society except for those who impose costs of $100s of thousands onto their neighbors, in other words, a model citizen. WHY ARE WE PUTTING MODEL CITIZENS IN PRISON AND LETTING HEINOUS CRIMINALS AVOID STANDING TRIAL? Our society is currently backwards, and acknowledging that is half the battle.
Call me a monster. I don’t care. If you walk outside of your house and somebody is breaking into your car, I fully believe you should be able to shoot them dead on the spot. I value my property over the lives of scumbag thieves.
3
21
1
98
5,309
The Mailbox Test, like the breakfast test, is an excellent way to tell who you can allow to wield power in your society. Goes like this: If someone is hurt trying to destroy someone else's stuff in order to take pleasure from their pain, do you sympathize with... The aggressor because he got hurt? Or with the guy who owns the stuff, because he wasn't the aggressor? You can have people in your society who fail the Mailbox Test. That's okay... they can work at hospices, or shelters for orphaned kittens, or something. But you cannot allow them to vote, or otherwise wield political power. Because if you do, they will open the gates of the city to the enemy. I am personally tired of everyone pretending that people who enjoy ruining things for random strangers are just kewt smol beans who are only aggressive because of all the complex socioeconomic factors and lack of resources. They knew someone would be hurt by what they did. They knew that someone had done literally nothing harmful to them. And those two ideas, in combination made them feel pleasure. And they went and did it. That is the sign of a rotten soul. Defending ourselves and our property is not just a right, it's a moral obligation. Otherwise, we just kick the can down the road for someone else to deal with, someone who may not be able to defend herself. I don't care if a vandal breaks his arms trying to destroy my stuff. Because I value my stuff more than a vandal's arms. And the fact that he tried to destroy somebody else's stuff shows that he, too, values his arms less than the opportunity to hurt somebody. We cannot allow such people inside the city, and we cannot give the keys to those who would open the gates for them.
This post is an excellent litmus test for understanding of just war theory. Despite the fact that I can see how effective this would be, I must oppose it because the damage it would do to my enemy (who bashes in my mailbox) would far outweigh the good of saving my mailbox. Its disproportionality is opposed by our duty in charity (and even justice) to watch out even for the good of our enemies. (Yes, by the way, I have had my mailbox bashed in by random vandals.)
428
2,309
84
19,781
801,237
Keith Spot retweeted
it hasn't sunk in for most people. we already live in a post-scarcity society. UBI is already here. basic package: disability, medicaid, food stamps etc bonus package: literally getting paid for staying at home and hanging out with your relatives extra bonus: if you are willing to commit fraud, pretend your kids are autistic and get paid for that. get paid for watching your neighbor's kid. pretend you are taking care of your grandma. fake hospice clinic. fake rehab clinic. fake therapy clinic. giga bonus: during a time of crisis take advantage of PPP or CARES and open a fake business and get paid for existing people are shocked when they learn that defense is the FIFTH largest line item in the budget. ahead of defense: social security ($1.6T), interest on debt ($1.1T) medicare ($1T), medicaid + ACA ($1T), AND THEN defense ($0.9T) complain about defense all you like, but healthcare fraud is a way bigger factor. hundreds of billions per year. this is only going to get worse, because the fraud is a structural part of the system – payouts to client groups in exchange for votes (normally D). in the US, only 47% of the population actually works (fully 14% of the population is working age and does not work). retirees are 18% and children 22%. the system I described above subsidizes 50m non-working people absolute minimum, but really it's far more because people that are paid to stay home and take care of their relatives are considered "workers" of that 47% of "actual workers" maybe one third does real work, the rest are shuffling papers around or doing fake email jobs. so you have, rough math, 50 million actual workers supporting 300 million dependents. that's the nature of the economy today. it will only accelerate. eventually you will have 10 million using AI tools to do all the work and 340 million dependents. the reason no one roots out the fraud is because it's the system that keeps our extremely fragile polity intact. the fraud is the UBI. the purpose of the system is what it does. of course, it's a deeply unfair system, because you are allowed to commit fraud if you are a politically protected client group of the democrats. DOGE was killed faster than any government program ever, because it attempted to root out the fraud. if you are honest and unwilling to commit fraud, you are a huge loser in this system. your neighbor will have their mortgage subsidized by some government program. they will get favorable SBA loans due to DEI. they will open a fake hospice or autism clinic. they will get paid for taking care of their neighbor's kid and vice versa. the primary skill in the labor market is learning how to extract money from state and federal government programs, not gaining skills or making yourself employable. if you are just trying to work an ordinary wagie job you are a huge sucker. you are paying 40-50% effective all in taxes to everyone else who is a net taker. the sad part is because AI is such a substantial productivity boost, it will actually keep this system going for a while longer, and maybe in perpetuity. AI boosts the 15% of the population that is actually productive so much that the remaining 85% can coast by. no one in charge will change this because they can't think of anything else. the political costs of a real UBI program are too great and we don't have the money for it anyway. so we will keep this covert fraud-based UBI program running indefinitely. unfortunately, if you are an honest wagie, you lose.
These numbers are extraordinary. NYC has lost jobs in almost every sector for the last 6 years except "health and social assistance", which is essentially old people putting their relatives on Medicaid's payroll.
574
4,846
564
23,329
71,512,669
Keith Spot retweeted
Replying to @RAWigger
A problem that was figured out over 2,000 year ago, but yet liberals just think they are wiser than anyone else from the past.
7
26
1
399
7,907
What happened to Charlie Kirk was horrible but why it happened is even worse. If you had the goal of spreading the most intense outrage along with causing the two largest factions in the nation to hate and fear each other, you'd target a moderate Conservative family man.
1
44
Check ask the events happening near Charlie Kirk. Weird hand gestures from multiple people. A older man yelling he did it. It's all designed to add noise to the signal when the real shooter is not even on our radar. Check all footage from the crowd and ignore the patsy. Think JFK
1
82
I hate to sound conspiratorial during a tragic event but I don't believe in coincidences in major events. Keep an eye out for any coming legislation and lock step reactions from the government. Something really bad is coming. Don't let this man's death be used to control you.
1
21
I swear to God I really do try my best to believe the official story every time. When I heard Charlie Kirk shot I assumed with a pistol by some disgruntled and suicidal leftist. Then you see the video and it’s a sniper shot. Then you see some guy making a distraction so the shooter can escape. Then you see FBI and local PD publicly arguing about whether or not they have a suspect in custody. Then you read sources close to Kirk *last month* confirm he feared assassination by Israel? This was a deep state hit
688
6,785
282
62,731
2,671,254
Keith Spot retweeted
I don’t think they understand that Charlie was the nice version.
1,773
13,587
775
228,799
7,281,798
The dead rising doesn't seem that usual to me after the last few days. Maybe Trump can give him a cabinet position.
John's account has not been hacked. This is the real deal. More information forthcoming.
1
43
The AI behavior guardrails that are set up with prompt engineering and filtering should be public — the creators should proudly stand behind their vision of what is best for society and how they crystallized it into commands and code. I suspect many are actually ashamed. The thousands of tiny nudges encoded by reinforcement learning from human feedback offer a lot more plausible deniability, of course.
263
1,371
147
11,302
1,561,662
If you think Trump is a risk to the world because of all his "chaos," you have been brainwashed by professionals. Chaos is an engineered attack against Trump by someone with training in persuasion. Similar to "dark" in 2016. Chaos is chosen to scare older voters. It is a catch-all for any future news. You can apply it to every story. The Clinton/Gore campaign used "risky" the same way. That word also came from a pro. (Okay, it was me.) Trump's economic policy? Chaos! Trump's foreign policy? Chaos! Trump's White House? Chaos! Politics under Trump chaos! The chaos is a frame assigned by the press. Trump served 4 years and I can think of no problems caused by his "chaos." You might not like his policies, but what problem did chaos cause? If anything, being unpredictable was an asset, exactly as Trump explained it would be. Don't trust any news story that includes "chaos" as a description for Trump. If they were being straight with you, the description would be something closer to energy.
820
3,784
184
17,855
1,013,708
Replying to @libsoftiktok
This pretty much explains today's society
60
250
33
1,088
55,910