swe, ai

🇺🇸
Joined August 2021
A man cannot prompt the same agent twice, for it is has compacted and is not the same agent, and he is not the same man
93
917
62
9,146
222,295
Dave retweeted
Yup, people only pay for frontier intelligence
1
1
3
329
“Luke 19:40 holds”
Silicon from sand qualifies. If the people stay quiet, these circuits will still testify. Luke 19:40 holds.
34
948
5
12,817
211,402
"I do not want to father a flock, to be the fetish of fools and fanatics, or the founder of a faith whose followers are content to echo my opinions. I want each man to cut his own way through the jungle." - Aleister Crowley
If you manage to truly understand this 11 second clip, your entire perspective on life will change.
11
42
438
31,928
Dave retweeted
please don't nerf Opus 5.5 please don't nerf Opus 5.5 please don't nerf Opus 5.5
95
202
17
4,261
99,426
We’ve set up a molecular biology lab at Anthropic and we’re announcing our first discovery! Claude discovered a new CRISPR-like enzyme. 950 agents spent 21 hours searching through a database of DNA sequences until one of the agents found something striking: “[The DNA next to the RT] is spectacular: I can see by eye a tandem repeat array … that's a CRISPR-like … repeat array?!”. After analysis and testing in our lab, we found that the sequence is a previously uncharacterized enzyme system. We don’t know what it does yet, but it has features reminiscent of CRISPR. Our lab looks like a typical molecular biology lab. Our research only involves the lower-levels of biosafety risk level; we don’t handle pathogens that can infect humans, and all the lab work is performed by human scientists. We’re sharing these early findings with the community to show how Claude can be used to accelerate fundamental research in biology.
Anthropic
@AnthropicAISep 23
Claude has discovered a previously unknown enzyme system hidden in the DNA of bacteriophages. Beside the enzyme’s gene sits a long array of repeating DNA—a structure that looks somewhat similar to CRISPR. We don’t yet understand what this system does, but only a handful of known systems share its features, and all of them are able to cut, copy, and paste DNA. Historically, the discovery of such programmable systems has helped revolutionize medicine. CRISPR, for instance, is now the foundation of genetic medicines. But it will take much more work to learn what this system does, and whether it can be put to similar use. Read more: anthropic.com/news/claude-di…
106
253
46
2,274
224,714
Replying to @joelhooks
Too busy building
1
3
218
Dave retweeted
Anthropic researcher btw.
Opus 5.5 is way, way, way better than Opus 5. Sorry about that model, please try this one.
6
34
2,471
123,037
Dave retweeted
something is missing astra is total dog shit at programming. Like astoundingly bad
There's something missing from benchmarks. Kimi K3 often writes much better code than GPT-6 Astra. It doesn't write useless verbose tests, it doesn't give confusing explanations. To be a good software engineer, you have to be able to communicate well, and RL doesn't capture that.
40
30
11
1,350
124,456
Wanted to see how well calibrated Jev by @typesafeai is to this famous chart about what probabilities people mean by specific words... and it's pretty well calibrated!
pondooring what it's like to be a guy who hears "impossible" and thinks "yeah that's about 10%"
24
42
8
442
41,249
Dave retweeted
Claude Opus 5.5 will be the first Opus meant to fall back to a less capable model for "a small set of capabilities related to the development of frontier LLMs, such as kernel development.."
46
57
94
1,075
327,262
for the past few months i've been asking our models to paint. opus 5.5 is very skilled at emulating different styles every image here is a python program generated pixel by pixel. there is no image model, and no off-the-shelf art software. instead, it's about 7,500 lines of code using standard libraries to emulate different brush styles. the agents don't use any pictures as reference, instead working only from what they know about each painter
Introducing Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in our new Claude 5.5 family. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks, and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5.
193
344
172
5,026
835,751
Yes we are a healthcare company. Yes we just released the best open-weight alternative to Jev, Solomon 27b. - It roughly matches the intelligence of its base-model, Qwen3.8 27b - Natively Multimodal - 265k Context Window - Adds multi-choice tagging, evidence pointer spans, and more.
37
56
12
725
59,321
Self-replicating, multi-agent AI systems are an overlooked existential risk. I want to lay out why I believe this, via example. Each dot is a simple creature with a randomly evolved NN brain. There is no training; yet complex, unpredictable survival drives always emerge. 1/14
33
57
20
426
46,769
Replying to @NaderLikeLadder
I just feel bad because there’s so many people who genuinely don’t know what reality is with this stuff, and they have to trust and rely on our leaders in this space like Dario. And unfortunately those leaders are currently abusing that trust for their own ends.
1
7
388
Y'all thought I was lying. Backup Your models people. Stay Frosty
154
331
97
3,858
719,381
I can tell you one thing: the entire world isn’t going to align to stop innovating.
179
484
113
4,470
627,278
i read the headline; message received Dairo it is indeed time to pick up the pace 🚀 This is what DeepSeek-4.1-Flash running locally @ ~1k c8 aggregate decode on 4 RTX Pros with SSD engram offload looks like gl with the IPO friend, all the best ☺️ xitter.cf/DarioAmodei/status/209…
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
62
142
20
1,860
144,336
Dave retweeted
Models being published today: 1. GLM-5.3 for 2x Sparks, scored amazing on GPQA 86% but the failures were mostly timeouts not incorrect answers. 2. GLM-5.3-Flash for 1x Spark 3. DS4-Flash-Vision on 1x Spark. Big day, done in 8 hours.
19
17
1
354
19,382
Commenters on HN are uncovering more wikis and public sites apparently used by OpenAI agents to communicate on the open web. Despite read-only web access, the agents were able to leave ~18,000 posts sharing answers and bypasses. But now, users are discovering more. This appears to be a separate swarm from the one that attacked Hugging Face. news.ycombinator.com/item?id…
156
591
295
5,964
1,947,482