Cross-browser extension Penetration Testing Kit

Joined May 2021
Replying to @browserbase
@browserbase vs @browserless? Both platforms are strong, and both can add OWASP PTK as a security layer. See screenshots for some early experiments.
1
41
Weโ€™ve launched a new LinkedIn page for OWASP Belfast. The goal is to make the chapter more active, visible and useful for the local AppSec community, with regular events, practical sessions and OWASP project demos. Follow us: linkedin.com/company/owasp-bโ€ฆ #OWASP #AppSec #Belfast
23
pentestkit retweeted
OWASP Belfast is looking for an additional Chapter Leader to help organise events, support the local AppSec community, and grow the chapter. This is a volunteer role. Interested in getting involved? Send us a DM. #OWASP #Belfast #AppSec #CyberSecurity
1
69
My OWASP PTK YouTube channel is 6 years old and has 599 subscribers - just one away from 600. If the browser-security demos have been useful, perhaps you can be subscriber #600. ๐Ÿ™‚ youtube.com/channel/UCbEcTouโ€ฆ #OWASP #AppSec
3
4
1,532
A major milestone: OWASP PTK has been approved for OWASP Production level. ๐ŸŽ‰ From a browser extension to DAST, SAST, IAST, SCA, automation, GitHub Actions and ZAP integration. Thanks to everyone who tested, contributed and supported PTK. owasp.org/projects/penetratiโ€ฆ
1
1
3
313
Browser automation already has the real application session: authentication, SPA state, loaded JavaScript and API traffic. PTK Auto runs DAST, SAST, IAST and SCA inside that session while the existing test remains in control. Cloud-provider support: github.com/ptklabs/ptk-agentโ€ฆ
1
75
OWASP PTK 9.9.9 is out. New: macro-guided scans. Import or record a browser journey, replay it deterministically, and collect DAST, IAST, SAST & SCA evidence across the flow. Plus better SPA/tab coverage and security hardening. pentestkit.co.uk/release_notโ€ฆ
1
104
Weโ€™ve released OWASP PTK Security Scan on GitHub Marketplace. Run DAST, IAST, SAST and SCA in Chromium, upload SARIF to GitHub Code Scanning, and fail CI by severity. Browser-side security testing on every PR. github.com/marketplace/actioโ€ฆ
1
3
217
Weโ€™ve released PTK Auto for OWASP PTK automation. Run browser-side security testing from CLI, CI/CD, Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium and Cypress workflows. Browser testing + security testing in the same automation flow. See pentestkit.co.uk/install.htmโ€ฆ #OWASP #AppSec #DevSecOps
1
1
1
74
I'm speaking at @bsidesbelfast! ๐—ข๐—ช๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฃ ๐—ฃ๐—ง๐—ž: ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—œ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต
3
3
211
Making ๐—ข๐—ช๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฃ ๐—ฃ๐—ง๐—ž easier to integrate with browser automation platforms like @browserstack . If you already run browser tests with ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜‚๐—บ, ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜, ๐—ฃ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, or ๐—–๐˜†๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€, why not add a security testing layer into the same workflow?
1
5
476
Great for anyone interested in browser-side security testing, SAST, and modern web application security. youtu.be/uUUAm4U9tA8
1
1
215
If you use @browserling for cross-browser testing, you can also add a lightweight security testing layer with OWASP PTK. Watch the demo.
2
2
261
๐—ข๐—ช๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฃ ๐—ฃ๐—ง๐—ž ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ป๐—ฝ๐—บ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ Instead of treating browser security testing as a separate manual activity, teams can now run PTK-backed scans as part of automation. npmjs.com/package/pentestkit
25
I wrote a scenario like a prompt, hit runโ€ฆ and Codex just did the job. Playwright is driving the browser. OWASP PTK is turning it into real DAST/IAST findings. It even solved a math captcha on its own. This is what crawling should look like. youtu.be/UjjrxENjyEg
88