
Energierevolutie? Ja graag! Campaigner @milieudefensie. Heeft #Klimaatzaak Shell gewonnen. Bevreesd maar moedig. https://xitter.cf/t.co/iV8lOX5Sxr
Amsterdam
Joined January 2009
- Tweets21.6K
- Following878
- Followers2.9K
- Likes1.8K
Peer de Rijk retweeted
The climate ambition gap must become an action gap no more. UNEP warns that emissions must fall 18% by 2030 and 45% by 2035, against 2025 levels, to pursue the lowest-overshoot pathway back to 1.5°C by 2100. The science is clear. Delivery must match the urgency.
Read more: theguardian.com/environment/…
Report: wedocs.unep.org/items/87c02c…
#ClimateAction #ClimateFinance #COP31
Peer de Rijk retweeted
Klare taal door @volkskrant columnist #JarlvanderPloeg
Peer de Rijk retweeted
In the UK, Germany, and Spain, building brand-new wind + storage is cheaper than simply paying for the fuel and maintenance of existing fossil plants
>Storage costs fell 93% since 2010
>New gas generation is now >$100/MWh
>Firm wind + storage in Germany hit $91/MWh and is plummeting toward $73 by 2030
In these markets, the marginal cost of just operating already-built fossil assets is higher than the total cost of building clean capacity from scratch
Fossil fuel power is structurally bankrupt
Peer de Rijk retweeted
Germany's electricity mix, 2000 vs 2025:
Renewables: 6% → 62%
Fossil fuels: 62% → 36%
Nuclear: 30% → 0%
Nuclear's exit was filled by renewables, not coal or gas.
Want more of this content + more detail and links to sources? Subscribe to my Substack: substack.com/@janrosenow
Peer de Rijk retweeted
Electricity generated from wind and solar is largely insulated from fossil fuel price volatility.
Once built, the fuel is free.
theguardian.com/environment/…
Peer de Rijk retweeted
O zo herkenbaar! Nog niet werkende techno-oplossingen halen makkelijk het nieuws (hoop!), maar ze worden gebruikt als een excuus voor uitstel/afstel van de oplossingen die al wél werken (wind, zon, energiebesparing en energiemanagement).
bit.ly/4bsMf6z- via ChangeInc.
Peer de Rijk retweeted
Column: Het compenseren van fossiele prijzen houdt Europa gevangen. nrc.nl/nieuws/2026/03/13/het…
Peer de Rijk retweeted
‼️ Meer dan 100 economen, waaronder ruim 80 hoogleraren, verzetten zich tegen de miljardensubsidie voor TATA Steel.
Ze zetten in een brief uiteen dat (de duurzamere groei van) Tata Steel de Nederlandse economie in de weg zit.
rtl.nl/nieuws/economie/artik…
Peer de Rijk retweeted
"Sunlight travels 93 million miles to reach the earth. None of them through the Strait of Hormuz."
Bill McKibben
quotesof.me/edit/0e7684cf-3b…
Peer de Rijk retweeted
Vanavond 19:00 uur, Telstar stadion Velden Zuid. De informatiebijeenkomst voor inwoners van de IJmond-regio over de Joint Letter of Intent (JLoI) met Tata Steel.
Zien we je daar?
noord-holland.nl/Actueel/Arc…
Peer de Rijk retweeted
Prima stuk. 'Advocaten mogen fossiele risico’s niet wegpoetsen ' fd.nl/opinie/1579082/advocat… (gratis te lezen)
Peer de Rijk retweeted
Even voor de duidelijkheid, de Europese christen-democraten gaan dus met extreem-rechts samenwerken om te voorkomen dat bedrijven hun CO2-uitstoot in kaart brengen en excessen als kinderarbeid en uitbuiting voorkomen. politico.eu/article/epp-to-l…
Peer de Rijk retweeted
Dit is tof: elke student kan nu GRATIS een abonnement op de Volkskrant krijgen. Dus studeer je, ken je iemand die op een MBO, HBO of WO zit: meld je meteen aan. Zolang je studeert, betaal je echt helemaal niets
abonnement.volkskrant.nl/stu…
Peer de Rijk retweeted
Betrouwbare Bronnen 536 👉 Het Grote Energie Verkiezingsdebat 💡 Suzanne Kröger (GroenLinks-PvdA) 🔌 Peter de Groot (VVD) ☀️ Ilana Rooderkerk (D66) 🔌 Jantine Zwinkels (CDA)💡 Hoe versnellen we de energietransitie na de riskante vertraging onder Schoof? ☀️omny.fm/shows/betrouwbare-br…
Peer de Rijk retweeted
Tien politieke partijen hebben hun verkiezingsprogramma’s door laten rekenen door het CPB. De doorrekening biedt een overzicht van de budgettaire en de economische gevolgen van de beleidsvoorstellen van de partijen.
Bekijk de doorrekening via:
cpb.nl/publicatie/keuzes-kaa…
Peer de Rijk retweeted
If you scroll through climate headlines right now, it’s easy to feel discouraged.
BP scaling back its wind plans. Big banks pulling out of net-zero alliances. Google’s emissions go up instead of down. In the US, political winds are blowing hard against decarbonization efforts.
Projects are getting defunded. People are losing jobs. The mood? Anxious, frustrated, even apocalyptic.
But zoom out, and the data tell a different story.
The Economist recently spotlighted a new trend in corporate climate strategy, which they called greenhushing.
In short, companies are doing the work (i.e. cutting emissions, setting ambitious targets, cleaning up their supply chains), but they’re talking about it less—not because they’ve given up, but because public attention is noisy and politicized. Instead, they’re flying under the radar and quietly doubling down.
Let’s look at the numbers:
• 37% of companies actually increased their climate ambition last year (PwC)
• 67% are on track to hit their targets, up from 64% in 2023
• Scope 3 targets (the hard stuff) are booming: 67% of firms have them, up from just 28% in 2022
• Companies with targets cut emissions intensity by 8%, compared to 3% for those without (MSCI)
• Record sales of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) credits in 2025, surpassing all previous years combined (cdr.fyi)
In other words: less noise, more action.
Yes, there are political setbacks, and some companies are scaling back the marketing of their sustainability work to avoid backlash. But in the background, many are giving the culture wars the finger and continuing anyway.
I find that… oddly encouraging.
This doesn’t mean we’re on track (we’re not, by a large margin), but the idea that ambition is evaporating ignores the full picture. The quieter truth is, decarbonization is still moving forward, just less loudly than before.
So to anyone feeling disillusioned by the headlines: don’t mistake silence for surrender.
There’s real progress happening behind the scenes.

































