Pécora retweeted
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
Pécora retweeted
There’s one point Tucker Carlson doesn’t mention: the destruction an Iranian retaliation could cause.
No one needs half a ton of 60% enriched uranium for anything except a weapon. It doesn’t matter what they say or what kind of legislation they claim to follow.
Starting from that premise, I would say that whoever had 60% enrichment more than a year ago and an agreement with the North Koreans, today not only has over 90% enrichment, but already possesses miniaturized warheads as well as dual-use missiles.
The chance that Iran has nuclear weapons today is very high.
What would Iran’s response be if attacked?
Strikes with missiles against Israel, and given the accuracy of recent launches against bases in Jordan, I would say Iranian missiles are better calibrated than they were in March.
Let’s say Iran responds and hits Israel with a warhead. What proportions are we talking about now?
Netanyahu is a megalomaniac whose executive brain function is incapable of measuring risks and self-preservation.
I don’t think Trump will commit this madness, but if he does, there is a significant risk that much more than contaminated water will occur.
Substack.com/@global21
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
Pécora retweeted
A turma do Duvivier já tá atacando o PT.
Esse corte nojento que tá circulando de "tem gente no PT que não quer ver pobre governar", vindo de um podcast cheio de playboy que nunca dá uma oportunidade pra artistas de origem pobre, é o puro suco da hipocrisia p
Praça São Salvador.
Pécora retweeted
O império opera diariamente para desestabilizar as democracia e a esquerda latino-americana através de suas ONGs. Todo mundo sabe que não tem almoço grátis né? Essa Orofino é paga pra desestabilizar o governo fazendo ciranda. Fuja dessas pessoas
Pécora retweeted
Confesso que dei boas risadas com os universitários que juram que sua mobilização foi responsável pela vitória de Lula. Amados, Lula ganhou apesar de nós. Somos intragáveis para boa parte da sociedade com nossas militâncias identitárias vazias e patrulha ideológica arrogante.
Pécora retweeted
🇺🇸 ATLAS POLL | US MIDTERMS 2026
Democrats hold a 14pp lead in the generic congressional ballot for the U.S. midterms.
🔵Democratic candidate: 55.5%
🔴Republican candidate: 41.4%
⚪️Don't know: 2.3%
🟡Would not vote: 0.8%
Pécora retweeted
Replying to @analise2025
Como Ministro da Fazenda, Meirelles:
- Criou o Teto de Gastos, congelando investimentos em saúde e educação por 20 anos
- Apresentou uma Reforma da Previdência obrigando 65 anos de idade e 49 anos de contribuição para o trabalhador se aposentar (nem o Congresso quis aprovar)
- Cortou mais de 400 mil benefícios previdenciários de deficientes e aposentados pobres
- Atingiu o maior desemprego da história até então, superando 12%
- Articulou a Reforma Trabalhista, reduzindo salários e precarizando o trabalho
- Defendeu a privatização da Petrobrás, Caixa e Banco do Brasil
Pécora retweeted
Maluco, cê num viu os chineses comentando como o Brasil trata drogado e bandido? Nem tô falando que tão certos, mas cês ficam se apegando a estética e ao nome "comunismo" sem olhar os detalhes
Fala pro chinês que a gente gasta mais com previdência do que eles tendo menos idosos, que nossa universidade pública é de graça
Vão te olhar como se tu fosse louco
Replying to @albertocalmeida
Fico imaginando o que seria da China há 50 anos se ficasse escutando que tem que gastar menos, investir menos, ajustar e ajustar. Projeto neoliberal precisa de só um país que tenha aplicado e se dado bem. Não tem. Nem mesmo um.
Enquanto o PT não causar um crise econômica catastrófica que destrua a constituição de 1988, o partido não vai sossegar.
Pécora retweeted
“O centavo gasto no pior projeto de saneamento básico é melhor que a maior parte dos projetos da Nova Indústria Brasil”
Pécora retweeted
meu irmão em cristo o brasil já teve hiperinflação nível alemanha no entre guerras, mas sem guerra, e esse pensamento n morreu, pelo contrário. nunca vai morrer enquanto n conseguirmos enviar o audiobook de "a miséria da crítica heterodoxa" via ondas 5g na mente do cidadão médio
Pécora retweeted
Dei ctrl f no artigo e digitei "unicamp"
Deu 1 resultado. Fechei, nem li.
Economistas propõem taxar ricos em vez de cortar gastos sociais
brasil247.com/economia/econo…
toma aqui seu 5000 reais para comprar uma coxinha e um suco, é a nova política monetária
vc fica milionário acrescentando zeros





















