"5. Work on dev, do NOT deploy. "
Seems odd that AI uses ALL CAPS when it wants to emphasize something in a prompt
Paul Baker retweeted
This is concerning. For the first time, a Chinese model Kimi K3 has taken #1 on the Frontend Code Arena and is scoring at or near the frontier on other benchmarks.
Meanwhile America is tying itself in knots: politicians and bureaucrats are banning new data centers, piling on state regulations, and pushing for new federal agencies to pre-approve frontier models.
This is how you lose the AI race. The rest of the world wonât play by our rules if we bog ourselves down. Permissionless innovation is how America won the internet and became the technological envy of the world. We can do it again with AI -- while addressing risks in a targeted way -- or weâll watch our lead evaporate.
Big news: Kimi-K3 by @Kimi_Moonshot is now #1 in the Frontend Code Arena with 1679 pts, surpassing Claude Fable 5.
This is a 17-place jump from Kimi-k2.6 (#18 -> #1).
In Frontend, Kimi-K3 ranked #1 in 6 of 7 domains: Brand & Marketing, Reference-Based Design, Data & Analytics, Consumer Product, Simulations, and Content Creation Tools, landing #2 only in Gaming behind Fable 5.
The full model weights will be released by July 27.
Congrats to the @Kimi_Moonshot team on this major milestone!
Paul Baker retweeted
Happy Fourth of July to all current and future Americans đşđ¸đşđ¸đşđ¸
Paul Baker retweeted
Happy Independence Day!
Thereâs a story from the end of the Revolutionary War I want to tell as we celebrate Americaâs 250th Birthday, and itâs one everyone in the world can learn from.
George Washington, at that moment, after commanding the American forces to victory, was the most powerful man in the new country. Many people talked about making him King of America.
Across the ocean, King George was sitting with an American painter, and asked what he thought Washington would do now that the war was ending. The painter said he believed he would go back to his farm.
The King said, âIf he does that, he will be the greatest man in the world.â
As the war officially ended, Washington came to speak to Congress and said, âHaving now finished the work assigned me, I retire from the great theater of Action.â He returned his commission theyâd given him in 1775 - after more than 8 years of leading the Americans to victory without pay, and he was home at Mount Vernon for Christmas.
Of course, he was elected as our first President a few years later, and after two terms, showed the same selflessness again when he willingly gave up his power and went back to Mount Vernon again.
Thatâs true greatness. He had all the power in the world. But power, alone, does not make you great.
Washingtonâs greatness came from being a true servant - to a cause much bigger than himself. His greatness was his complete lack of selfishness.
The whole story of American Independence is a story of selflessness. Itâs a story of people who set their self-interest aside and worked for each other.
Weâve all heard the line about âWe must all hang together, or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately.â
Apparently, Ben Franklin might have actually never said that.
But thatâs fine, because the same mentality is right there in the last line of the Declaration of Independence, published on this day 250 years ago:
âAnd for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.â
We mutually pledge to each other.
No one was in this alone. No one was in it for themselves. This was a group of people with different backgrounds who were in it for each other.
Today is a reminder: greatness comes from what we do for each other, never what we do for ourselves.
Thatâs a lesson that applies no matter what country you call home.
Itâs a lesson that doesnât require any law passed by a politician, because, letâs be honest, if youâre waiting for selfless politicians, I really hope you are not holding your breath.
All of us have the power to be there for the people around us. For our families and friends. For our neighbors. For everyone.
All of us can reach for greatness.
Itâs as simple as looking beyond yourself, seeing past the mirror, picking your eyes up from your phone, and pledging to be there for each other.
Happy Fourth. May you all find your own version of greatness today by lifting each other up.
Lift up your neighborhood. Lift up America. Lift up the World.
Paul Baker retweeted
We have rediscovered at great cost what Americaâs first @USTreasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton taught us: the nation that depends on its adversaries for critical inputs is neither truly sovereign nor truly prosperous.
As we approach 250 years of American independence, we would do well to remember that our founders left us more than a Republicâthey bequeathed a roadmap powerful enough to sustain it for two and a half centuries and beyond.
Paul Baker retweeted
David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sh*t
Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x.
âThere is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again.
What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business.
There is revenue and thereâs costs.
On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal.
The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you.
Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI.
So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people.
I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, âWe want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.â So we are going to hire more people.
And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground.
It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sh*t.â
Paul Baker retweeted
Warehouse robotics is moving fast, but scaling automation across high-mix 3PL operations is still the real challenge.
The Forbes piece on Tutor Intelligence had a great point around âSKU coverage.â
hubs.ly/Q04fS4ss0
#3PL #Robotics #WarehouseAutomation
AI is going to cause a hiring boom at SMBs and its just math.
The dominant narrative right now: "1 person with Claude can replace a 5-person marketing department."
Wrong viewpoint.
The right one - what happens if I upskill my 5-person marketing team with AI?â Now that same team can create the output of a 25-person marketing department.
If marketing produces 5x the output, you get 5x the campaigns, 5x the content, 5x the leads, 5x the sales opportunities.
Then what?
You need more BDRs. More AEs. More ops support. More customer service. More fulfillment capacity.
Your choice becomes
1) save 4 salaries and stay constant with output; or,
2) hire the equivalent of 20 more experts at a TOTAL cost of $6k per year
BlackBerry stole your evenings.
iPhone stole everything except sleep.
OpenAI + Claude just stole your sleep tooâby doing real work while youâre unconscious.
The last truly off time in human life is officially over.
youtube.com/watch?v=Qx-cI4LKâŚ
This video was from 1977. 50 years ago @NASA was rolling out the Space Shuttle Enterprise.
Recursive, multiplicative, triple exponential for Humanoid robots youtube.com/clip/UgkxEURGOGG⌠via @YouTube
The early days of our 13 cobot deployment in Dallas. The picking accuracy progress has improved 40% in the first three months as the vision model has expanded 30x during pilot phase.
Warehouses are OBSOLETE in 2026.
Calling it a "warehouse" traps you in storage mode â pallets gathering dust = massive hidden costs.
The future? Kinetic Centers: facilities obsessed with Flow Velocity. not cubic feet.
Potential energy â Kinetic energy. Stasis is the enemy.
Breakdown of transition from warehouse->kinetic center here:
xitter.cf/pbaker99/status/201262âŚ
Paul Baker retweeted
Never underestimate reflexivity.
The U.S. built a system of rules because it benefited from it.
China took advantage of that system to get stronger.
At some point the U.S. realizes that the system has gone from an asset to a liability.
It tears down that system.
A generation of intelligent Americans read the works of Dalio.
They understood the mistakes made by prior hegemons.
So when they viewed the risks of a repeat being too great they stepped up and volunteered for service.
You have heard a lot about Bessent⌠but you have no clue how many Thiels and Druckenmillers wouldnât hesitate to drop everything and take his phone calls and game theory out how to best approach rebuilding a new system that benefits the U.S.
Many of you are unfamiliar with the difference between a smart person and truly high IQ individual.
And by virtue of our economic system the U.S. is pretty dam good at finding those people, attracting them here and then making them incredibly wealthy⌠and often patriotic.
Typically the risk-reward of sticking your head up and volunteering if youâre one of these individuals is poor.
Much better off running a hedge fund or startup and living a life of obscure luxury.
But when the system is threatened you respond because you know you canât hide.
This is the story of Freedoms Forge during WW2.
This is the story of Bessent and Musk today.
đŤĄ



















