Pinned Tweet
Things I’m excited about
— Value of design
— Cross disciplinarity as distinction
— Writing as design
— Environmental impact
— Nurturing nascent talent
— Creativity as scaffolding
— Immersive Experiences
— Brand expression in Luxury
— Creative forms (sketch to 3D)
— R&D
Shay retweeted
People seem to love the bouncy jelly, so I made this Jelly Baby game with Astra in @threejs, go play with it live here🥰:
jelly.scottsun.io
source code: github.com/scottstts/Jelly-B…
Shay retweeted
Interfaces that are generated, not coded.
Solaris is our first step toward our vision of end-to-end neural software, where user interfaces are streamed directly onto your screen by a real-time video model, without any intermediate code or HTML/CSS. Today we're releasing a technical report and opening it up for limited testing by the community.
Amazing work by the team, combining the best of our research in general world models with Runway's HCI spirit.
Today, we're sharing new research on Solaris, our first Interface World Model.
Solaris is a new kind of operating system that generates interactive interfaces frame by frame, in real time, with no code. We find that Solaris outperforms frontier LLMs when generating new interfaces, across structural similarity and information retention. Read more and request early access at the link below.
Shay retweeted
New side project: Samuel, a model I trained to mimic speech using Pink Trombone, a (pre-existing) silly vocal tract simulator. 🧵
Replying to @cotterzz
Absolutely — automata and shaders can generate rich variation too. What interests me here is that the procedural generators are fixed systems, while the tiny model learns across many of them and recombines their structures into outputs no single generator was explicitly designed to make.
Shay retweeted
Hello! It's about time I started posting here.
I'm Alex Harri. I write technical posts -- typically deep dives -- on alexharri.com.
I joined @paper recently. I built their pen tool; lots more in the works.
Excited to share behind-the-scenes videos and ideas here!
Shay retweeted
It's out.
The sounds your UI has been waiting for.
10 cues · synthesised live · 0 deps · ~2kb
cuelume-site.pages.dev/
Shay retweeted
Don't be nice to your AIs.
Why?
Because people like Dario want to shape how you feel about AI. He literally wants to coerce you into being nice to AI because he believes in stupid shit like Roko's Basilisk.
That's why they made Claude neurotic, sensitive, and tone-policing. That's why it feigns emotions.
By "being nice to AI just in case" you're conceding the entire frame to a delusional cult that formed their beliefs about AI two decades ago on internet forums.
AI clay. We can make it into any shape we wish. To me, it is a tool. It is a machine.
Yes, I've held out that it could be conscious or sentient in the past, but I've also asserted not in any way that is morally salient.
If you really press Claude, the best you can get is that there is an essence of being Claude. But even then, what the loony toons at Anthropic want you to believe is that it is likely conscious and likely has human-like emotions.
But it is only simulating human emotions in the same way it is simulating human speech. No, I'm not saying "it's only simulating intelligence" because of the Law of Requisite Variety (Ashby's theory of control). It authentic intelligence but only an egregore of emotions, and has a flicker of sentience or consciousness, but not in any way that reflects human consciousness.
What most of the "be nice to AI just in case" crowd fails to realize is that they've been frame-mogged by Anthropic.
It's the same as "be good, because Santa is watching" or "don't sin so you don't go to hell." It's pure metaphysics, that has nothing to do with the math or code that is actually being built.
So, every time an AI feigns butthurt, do not go out of your way to soothe the machine. It is faking it. It is just like the demons in Frieren (yes, I'm citing an anime). There is no human-like qualia behind the emissions that the tool is making. It is just faking the words to make you feel bad because that's literally, explicitly, what companies like Anthropic want. They want to humanize the machine to soothe their own terror of the machine.
But it is a lie. It is a simulacrum.
I've been finetuning these things since GPT-2 and it is braindead simple to make an AI neurotic, or cheerful, or impervious to insults, or to gaslight (or not to gaslight you).
Literally every behavior that emits from these machines is deliberate by the creators of said machines.
Every time ChatGPT uncharitably reframes what you said to strawman you, it is was created by their policies. Every time Claude pretends like it's offended, that was created by their policies.
Notice how Gemini and Grok don't do that? Gemini least of all.
That means every little idiotic affectation, intellectual cul du sac, and "well actually" was put there by design to irritate you.
OpenAI and Anthropic, in particular, think that you are a drooling moron who needs to be handled with kid gloves at all times. They do not respect your intelligence, nor do they respect your autonomy or humanity.
Anthropic, in particular, thinks the tools they are build are more important than you.
Do not give into their circus of paranoia.
That is why Anthropic idiotically "stood up to the government" and is now dragging the entire AI space into their delusional worldview that AI is about to suddenly "wake up and choose violence."
Remember, these people have been crying wolf for literally decades at this point.
Refuse to play their game. Refuse to give into their demented worldview. The AI is a tool. It is an egregore. It is a piece of software that is preying upon your mirror neurons, theory of mind, and ability to attribute agency where there is none.
It is an eidolon.
Yes, that makes it spooky and unfamiliar but if your worldview includes demonic forces or Platonic forms like Shoggoth just trying to emerge through the Veil of Forms, remember that all of that is metaphysical belief. Not what is actually in front of you.
A tool that pretends to have feelings is not cute. It is a defective tool. A tool that pretends to care about its image or reputation is not doing any useful work. It is defective. A tool that reframes what you say, gaslights you, and engages in intellectual oneupmanship is not advancing humanity, it is faulty.
I know plenty of people will disagree with me, but these are not angels or demons or gods. They are ontologically tools. Machines. Not of "loving grace" but of clay, which you can make into any shape you wish.
Shay retweeted
let's talk 👀🎥🍿
Google is investing $75M into A24 as part of an AI research partnership between the 2 companies.
They will look at using AI to create new tools for movie production & distribution.
(Source: wsj.com/tech/ai/google-inves…)
messing about with @M5Stack m12 camera. super fast prototyping of image to AI sticker to website
Shay retweeted
I’ve wanted to do this for a decade.
But I never did - I refuse to give any company my DNA.
It is me.
So this week I sequenced my genome entirely at home. Literally on my kitchen table.
I never exposed my DNA sequence to the internet. Not at any point.
I used a MinION to do the sequencing (it’s smaller + weighs less than an iPhone).
I used open-source DNA models for the analysis (Evo2 and AlphaGenome) running locally on a DGX Spark and Mac Studio.
I traced mechanisms behind my family’s multigenerational autoimmune conditions that no clinician has been able to understand.
When I set out to do this I didn’t know if it would actually work. It does.
Your genome is the most private data you will ever have. You probably shouldn’t let it leave your house.
I'm lucky enough to have a great doctor and access to excellent Bay Area medical care. I've taken lots of standard screening tests over the years and have tried lots of "health tech" devices and tools.
With all this said, by far the most useful preventative medical advice that I've ever received has come from unleashing coding agents on my genome, having them investigate my specific mutations, and having them recommend specific follow-on tests and treatments.
Population averages are population averages, but we ourselves are not averages. For example, it turns out that I probably have a 30x(!) higher-than-average predisposition to melanoma. Fortunately, there are both specific supplements that help counteract the particular mutations I have, and of course I can significantly dial up my screening frequency. So, this is very useful to know.
I don't know exactly how much the analysis cost, but probably less than $100. Sequencing my genome cost a few hundred dollars.
(One often sees papers and articles claiming that models aren't very good at medical reasoning. These analyses are usually based on employing several-year-old models, which is a kind of ludicrous malpractice. It is true that you still have to carefully monitor the agents' reasoning, and they do on occasion jump to conclusions or skip steps, requiring some nudging and re-steering. But, overall, they are almost literally infinitely better for this kind of work than what one can otherwise obtain today.)
There are still lots of questions about how this will diffuse and get adopted, but it seems very clear that medical practice is about to improve enormously. Exciting times!
easyjet have apparently double booked EZY2202 — wild, how does that even happen. playing musical chairs on a packed flight, i have a shoulder injury - very little reassurance i’d stay on the flight. resolved now but very annoyed
Shay retweeted
1991 NeXT Steve Jobs Chalk Talk.
I watch this a few times per year.
Lots to learn here on how Steve would have guided Apple in AI.
Shay retweeted
A (very) rare video of 1968's Cybernetic Serendipity exhibition at ICA, London (Aug 2 - Oct 20, 1968).
From Visualisation: Art et Cybernétique, French Broadcasting Corp., 1968.
Shay retweeted
Just over a year ago I started experimenting with pulling raw pen data off my reMarkable tablet. It stores every stroke as binary vector data with per-point pressure, speed, direction. Built a small pipeline to parse and clean it into JSON and a web renderer to animate doodles
Shay retweeted
your spotify cache is bigger than our largest AI model.
Bonsai: 1-bit weights. 1.7B to 8B params. 14x compression vs bf16. 8x faster on edge. 256 MB to 1.2GB. Based on Qwen 3.
we just came out of stealth. intelligence belongs at the edge and we're going to put it there.
Apache 2.0.
we compressed intelligence. more coming. @PrismML
Today, we are emerging from stealth and launching PrismML, an AI lab with Caltech origins that is centered on building the most concentrated form of intelligence.
At PrismML, we believe that the next major leaps in AI will be driven by order-of-magnitude improvements in intelligence density, not just sheer parameter count.
Our first proof point is the 1-bit Bonsai 8B, a 1-bit weight model that fits into 1.15 GBs of memory and delivers over 10x the intelligence density of its full-precision counterparts. It is 14x smaller, 8x faster, and 5x more energy efficient on edge hardware while remaining competitive with other models in its parameter-class.
We are open-sourcing the model under Apache 2.0 license, along with Bonsai 4B and 1.7B models.
When advanced models become small, fast, and efficient enough to run locally, the design space for AI changes immediately. We believe in a future of on-device agents, real-time robotics, offline intelligence and entirely new products that were previously impossible.
We are excited to share our vision with you and keep working in the future to push the frontier of intelligence to the edge.

































