We work to build vibrant and inclusive democracies whose governments are accountable to their people. Community guidelines: https://xitter.cf/t.co/yPYMoB0shS

Worldwide
Joined January 2008
On October 9, the Trump administration imposed sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) itself—the court of last resort for victims of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. This was the latest step in a rolling series of sanctions against individual judges, prosecutors, and human rights actors who have worked for and with the ICC. The Open Society Foundations are fighting the sanctions regime in federal court. The sanctions are part of an escalating campaign which, as U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced in July, is intended to “dismantle the ICC—brick by brick, if necessary.” Already concerned about the sanctions in place since 2025, we, together with the American Friends Service Committee @afsc_org, the Center for Constitutional Rights @theCCR, and Human Rights Watch @hrw, filed a lawsuit in federal court in New York on August 11, 2026. The case argues that the sanctions regime exceeds presidential authority, violates constitutional protections of free expression and association, and is unconstitutionally vague. The ICC is where victims of the gravest crimes—from Gaza to Ukraine to the Philippines—can turn when their own governments will not act, and where even heads of state can be made to answer. The Trump administration’s sanctions are designed to close that door, and to punish anyone who helps keep it open.
13
18
4
51
12,877
Open Society Foundations retweeted
The Trump administration’s sanctions on the ICC as an institution create additional harms for those seeking justice for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide, and threaten fundamental freedoms. We’ve joined with others to defend the ICC. thehill.com/opinion/criminal…
6
3
1
11
6,310
The Open Society Foundations today condemned the Trump administration’s announcement of new sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) as an institution, an unprecedented escalation of its campaign against the independent court dedicated to ensuring accountability for the gravest crimes. “Since its establishment, the International Criminal Court has served as a court of last resort, delivering justice and accountability for victims of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide when they have nowhere else to turn. The Trump administration’s actions are a direct attack on the victims’ right to pursue accountability for crimes against Ukrainians, Palestinians, the Rohingya, Darfurians, and women and girls in Afghanistan,” said Binaifer Nowrojee @NowrojeeOSF, president of the Open Society Foundations. “The attack on the ICC punishes the people seeking justice instead of the perpetrators. These actions threaten to create a new era of impunity, where grave crimes go unpunished, and the perpetrators are free to repeat them. No one should be beyond the reach of the law, no matter how powerful. Open Society is committed to a world where human rights are protected, power is constrained by law, and justice is available to all.” Open Society supported the campaign to establish the ICC following the genocides in Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s to prevent those responsible from evading justice. As a court of last resort for victims who have nowhere else to turn, the ICC investigates and prosecutes individuals responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and the crime of aggression when national authorities are unwilling or unable to do so. Nearly two-thirds of UN member states have joined the court. Its work spans the globe; it has initiated 18 investigations in countries including the Philippines, Sudan, Venezuela, and Ukraine. Open Society has long supported the ICC’s engagement with civil society and has consistently opposed efforts to undermine the court’s independence. In August, the Open Society Institute, a part of the Open Society Foundations, joined three human rights groups in a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s previous sanctions targeting individuals and organizations affiliated with or assisting the work of the ICC. In 2025, the Open Society Justice Initiative joined more than 70 civil society and faith-based organizations in warning against the potential use of sanctions to attack the court. The group argued that the ICC performs a vital role in international affairs by investigating crimes that shock the conscience of humanity and that “it does so in a manner that protects the due process rights of the accused, the sovereignty of states, including the United States, and the rights of victims.” Open Society is committed to the independent and impartial pursuit of international justice wherever crimes that violate international law have been perpetrated.
9
14
1
46
36,226
How can the multilateral system better reflect Global South leadership? How can we center human rights and dignity in the age of AI? How is the U.S. war on Iran reshaping Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea geopolitics? As world leaders and decision makers gathered for UNGA 81, Open Society convened a diverse group of civil society voices and local and regional policymakers to share innovative approaches and creative solutions from across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean.     Together we discussed how we can reshape multilateralism to better reflect the realities of the new world order but remain grounded in rights, dignity, equity, and opportunity for all.   We are working with our partners to help build a multilateral future that reflects our open society values and the realities of a global order, in which power is shifting in a more representative and democratic direction. It is a future that must answer the needs of our shared humanity and the planet—and empower the states that will bring those aspirations to life.
18
17
4
57
42,572
Emma Bonino, the pioneering Italian politician, trailblazing human rights advocate, and a former Open Society board member, died on September 11, 2026, at the age of 78. She was committed to the humane treatment of all, from those in jail to migrants to women seeking safe abortions and beyond, writes Aryeh Neier, president emeritus of the Open Society Foundations. Bonino first gained prominence in her native Italy by leading the campaign to legalize abortion. She drew national attention after turning herself in to the police for seeking a clandestine abortion and helping other women do the same. She later became involved in the Radical Party, which was dedicated to advancing civil rights. Her political career included leading Italy’s ministries of trade and European affairs and serving as the country’s foreign minister. She also served as a member of the European Commission and helped drive efforts to establish the International Criminal Court. Despite decades of supporting abortion, divorce, and assisted dying in opposition to the Catholic Church, she counted Pope Francis among her close friends. Francis called her “one of Italy’s greats.” Conservative Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said of Bonino, “Our stories and sensibilities have been distant, but this has never prevented me from recognizing her weight and role in our nation’s public life.”
5
9
38
33,419
Open Society Foundations retweeted
At the recent #GWLVoices high-level event at #UNGA81, senior policymakers and multilateral leaders came together to reflect on the future of global governance and the importance of representation. @SusanaMalcorra @HelenClarkNZ @nmusar
3
5
14
5,698
Seven months into the U.S. war on Iran, fighting has widened and the consequences have spread far beyond Iran’s borders. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz, rising insecurity in the Red Sea, and pressure on energy markets are felt in the Gulf, Lebanon, Syria, and the Horn of Africa.
12
8
28
23,439
Violence in the Black Sea restricting grain exports and a strengthening El Niño are further compounding food insecurity in already vulnerable communities. In response, a new multilateral system is emerging with the rising influence of an expanding group of middle powers, including ones in the Gulf and Africa, who are advancing new approaches to security. Discussions at UNGA 81 called on the international community to address the war’s compounding shocks and repercussions.
4
2
12
7,603
Open Society Foundations retweeted
I gathered with local leaders and peace builders from Kenya, the Netherlands, Mexico, Colombia, and Spain to talk about local multilateralism for peace and safety. At Open Society, we hold a simple conviction: security that is not built on human rights is not security at all. Lasting peace cannot be designed from above and delivered to people. It has to be built with them.
3
7
44
6,767
More than 1,500 academics and economists from over 100 countries support an International Panel on Inequality, saying in a joint letter, “Extreme concentrations of income and wealth translate into undemocratic concentrations of power, unravelling trust in our societies and polarizing our politics.”
5
8
22
50,732
Too often, the human rights movement has preferred rights in the negative: no to torture, no to censorship, no to detention without trial. But there must also be an affirmation of something positive—a vision of what could be. As global decisionmakers gather in New York for UNGA 81, Open Society hosted events exploring new ideas and perspectives on the opportunity to reimagine the future of human rights.
6
6
24
19,800
It isn’t about weakening universal protections already secured in law, but about enriching them and rebalancing the scales for future generations. Economic, social, and environmental rights need to be placed alongside civil and political rights—they are conditions that make freedoms real. The future of human rights must be rooted in dignity, freedom, and opportunity for all.
4
5
13
6,640
Open Society Foundations retweeted
Earlier this year in March, the UN adopted a landmark resolution declaring the trafficking of enslaved Africans “the gravest crime against humanity.”
2
2
1
1
4,432
The current multilateral world order has struggled against the double standards of great powers, who have stripped multilateral institutions of their influence, shaped the rules to their advantage, and follow them only when it suits. Today at UNGA 81, Open Society hosted conversations with municipal government officials, civil society and philanthropy leaders, policymakers, and more to tackle some of the central questions facing the international system. A new model of multilateralism is emerging as new coalitions of middle powers and countries of the Global South come together around demands for shared prosperity and sovereignty. Discussions focused on exercising their leadership in regional security, international financial reform, and rights reform, and advancing local models of peace, public safety, and reconstruction shaped by communities.
5
8
27
16,846
A multilateral system built on minimal states has left governments with little room to respond to people’s needs; when states are able to deliver at home, they have more of a voice abroad. We’re working to support a shift in multilateral systems from instruments of fiscal discipline and constraints on public policy to enablers of a more just, equitable, and prosperous future for all.
1
19
5,926
Can tech workers take on the oligarchs? In 2022, after Elon Musk bought Twitter, tech workers turned union organizers JS Tan and Clarissa Redwine @clarissaredwine made a failed attempt to unionize the company’s workers. “It wasn’t just an attack, but a celebration of dominance,” shares Redwine, describing how Musk turned Twitter into a stage to discipline his workforce. The organizers’ new book, Against Tech Oligarchy, describes what went wrong in that campaign and what tech workers can learn from it. With AI already serving as a pretext for mass layoffs, Tan and Redwine argue tech workers can’t afford to defer a confrontation with their bosses any longer.
2
3
1
14
28,702