
Freelance media based in the UK, independent reporting on current affairs. Founding member @unitedfreepres Sub to: https://xitter.cf/t.co/2ByHVetZQ2
United Kingdom
Joined May 2021
- Tweets2.1K
- Following1.4K
- Followers713
- Likes11.7K
Onemanreports retweeted
The entire premise of ‘gender transition’ is a fraud.
After cross-sex hormones and surgery, the share of young Finns needing psychiatric care went from 19% to 49%!
Finland tracked every young person sent to its gender clinics, for up to 25 years. Among those given cross-sex hormones or surgery, 19.2% had needed specialist psychiatric care before their first clinic visit. After their last procedure, 48.9% did. Their matched peers stayed flat.
We were told cross-sex hormones and surgery would fix these young people's mental health. Finland checked. After the drugs and the surgery, far more of them needed psychiatric care, not fewer.
What Finland found
Finland sends every young person who wants a medical "gender reassignment" to one of two university hospital clinics, in Helsinki and Tampere. Researchers led by Dr. Sami-Matti Ruuska, an adolescent psychiatrist, and Prof. Riittakerttu Kaltiala, a professor of adolescent psychiatry at Tampere University, pulled the national health records for every one of them.
That's 2,083 people under 23 who went to those clinics between 1996 and 2019. Each was matched with eight people of the same birth year and hometown, 16,643 in all. Some were followed for up to 25 years.
The new numbers
Critics claimed the first analysis might have counted people who hadn't had their drugs or surgery yet. So in September the authors ran it again, starting the clock only after each person's last step: cross-sex hormones, breast removal, or genital surgery.
•Before their first gender-clinic visit, 19.2% had needed specialist psychiatric care.
•At some point after their last procedure, 48.9% did.
•Their matched peers, counted from the same dates, went from 14.4% to 13.2%.
After their last procedure, these young people were about six times as likely as the general population to need specialist psychiatric care. That held for both males and females.
billboardchris.com/news/2026…
Onemanreports retweeted
There is no “conversation” to have.
I am a British Army veteran, and I would never fight to the death for this government, its politicians, or their “plans”.
I would, however, absolutely fight to the death defending my home, my family and my country.
And if that means standing on my own doorstep, refusing to be carted off to fight somebody else’s war, then so be it.
Russia is NOT our enemy. The real threat is already here. I, and every other veteran I’ve spoken with, will be staying on home soil, thank you very much.
Onemanreports retweeted
Someone Wanted Me To Expose Piers Morgan:
Let's 1st Understand One Thing
You need to understand what Piers Morgan actually is before you understand what he does. He is not a journalist. He is not an interviewer. He is not even a personality in the way the public understands personality. He is a placement agent for narrative laundering. His entire career is a single assignment: to sit in the most visible chair available and cleanse dirty assets with the appearance of scrutiny.
So What Exactly Is His Function?
His tactic is simple, and it works because the audience has been trained to mistake volume for courage. He screams at people. He interrupts. He postures as the indefatigable truth-seeker who asks the "tough questions." But the spectacle is a magic trick. The real questions never get asked. The screaming is the cover for the script. The confrontation is the alibi.
Nobody gets grilled on a Piers Morgan show unless the grilling serves the network's interests. And when a protected asset like Zelenskyy sits down, the "tough questions" are written by the same people who wrote Zelenskyy's talking points.
Why?
Because Piers Morgan has been a controlled asset for decades. His career is a latticework of editor positions at major tabloids, television networks, and media properties, each one owned by the exact financial class he claims to oppose. You do not get handed the editorship of an international tabloid at 29 years old because of talent alone. You get it because you are known to be dependable. You will run the stories you are told to run. You will kill the stories you are told to kill. And you will do it with such performative bluster that nobody notices the pattern.
Morgan's recent defense of Zelenskyy is not an act of conscience. It is a scheduled perception operation, executed with all the subtlety of a knee on a neck. The rollout is coordinated interviews highlighting Zelenskyy's "feelings of betrayal," his "emotional pain" over American politics, his "lonely fight against corruption." None of it is journalism. It's an image reconstruction campaign.
Here's The Tell:
The framework is always emotional, never forensic. A real interviewer following the money would ask about the DTRA documents. About the biolab records. About the former Ukrainian prosecutor who was fired for investigating corruption in the energy sector. About the cargo manifests moving through Odesa. About the offshore accounts and shell companies linked to the political class in Kyiv. About the disappearance of billions in Western "aid" into private hands.
A real journalist would ask about the adrenochrome logistics, the trafficking corridors, the organ brokerage networks that moved through Ukrainian territory for years.
Piers Morgan asks none of it. Instead, he asks about feelings. He asks about betrayal. He lets Zelenskyy weep on camera or perform the appearance of it because emotional theater is the smoke screen. The audience responds to the crying, not the cargo.
The performative vulnerability distracts from the forensic reality. And Piers knows exactly what he's doing. He has spent thirty years learning which emotional buttons to push to keep a conversation from ever becoming dangerous.
What did the London media do during the Epstein disclosures?
They ran the American imports and added nothing. Zero investigative energy on the British side of the network. Zero follow-up on the London banking. Zero on the properties, the tax structures, the charity fronts, the art transactions. The British press Morgan's press treated Epstein as a foreign story that happened to have a British prince attached. That omission is not an accident. It's an editorial decision made by people who knew the trail would lead home.
Morgan's silence on the British side of the Epstein network is louder than any interruption he's ever performed on camera. He knows where the bodies are buried metaphorically, and in at least one case, with a specificity that would make the hair on your neck stand up. The London blackmail economy was built on exactly this kind of shared knowledge: everyone holds everyone's video, so nobody talks.
We will dig more into him later.
@piersmorgan
Onemanreports retweeted
Communications Minister Anika Wells has an extraordinary Freudian slip while trying to sell the ‘Digital Duty of Care’ bill to the public:
“We are controlling freedom of speech.”
Onemanreports retweeted
Ask yourself: Who stands to gain?
Who stands to lose everything?
There is still time.
Onemanreports retweeted
They blew up the twin towers, faked a pandemic, admitted that they eat babies, and everyone is still out here talking about voting our way out of it...
Onemanreports retweeted
In Scotland 🏴 they want refugees and asylum seekers to join the police 🤣👇
Onemanreports retweeted
British Transport Police scanned the faces of 537,697 people at London railway stations over six months. The trial produced one alert, and that alert was false. It cost £320,786 ($424,000)
The police responded by extending the trial by four months and expanding the area. Since then, 926,912 people have been scanned in total. The system has made only three correct identifications, and every one of them ended with no action. The arrest column still reads zero.
The watchlist, meanwhile, has grown from 381 names to 862. Transport for London welcomed the expansion and said it would tackle violence against women and girls.
More than half of the police forces in England and Wales now scan faces in public, and every failed trial is treated as a reason to scan more of them.
reclaimthenet.org/british-tr…
Onemanreports retweeted
Not a big fan of the fact that every time I post this it's only more relevant than before.
Onemanreports retweeted
Replying to @KathyParr101
Short answer, yes.
The law changed in November 2024 and from then it was legal to add it (it would have been illegal the day before).
By September 2025, all millers were adding it.
The labelling did not change and, in some cases, still has not changed.
hartgroup.org/folic-acid-is-…
Onemanreports retweeted
Replying to @RabbiJeffx @grok
Bibi didn't ask: how can I prevent this? He asked: How can I exploit this? There's no way in hell they didn't know. Urgent meetings the night before, on the 50th anniversary to the day of the 1973 war. No one informed the Nova Festival that was moved TO THE BORDER.
🙄🙄🙄
Onemanreports retweeted
Replying to @Gaynotqueer1
Maybe they should all mask up for a while, because it seems there is a trans child pandemic running through Hollywood.
"Western values"
Here we have retired US diplomat Robert Ford openly acknowledged that he and Britain’s MI6 were involved in helping rebrand former Al-Qaeda head-chopper Ahmed al-Sharaa into Syria’s new leader.
Not diplomacy.
Not accountability.
Just a full-blown image-washing operation.
Taking a jihadist past and repackaging it for Western consumption like a carefully managed PR campaign.




















