오 원히🐼

On one hand, you acknowledge that the shareholders suffered heavy losses, but on the other hand, you claim it was a 'victimless crime.' If shareholders lose out financially because company funds are used illegally by their CEO/Co-CEO, then those shareholders are real victims. You are also trying to downplay the embezzlement charge as if Seungri was convicted merely for 'playing with money' when the official charge was the conscious and illegal misappropriation of corporate funds (embezzlement). ​You are spreading a fictional romanticization commonly used to build an image of Seungri as a hero. However, regarding the Assault Accusation/Incitement in December 2015, the trial facts proved quite the opposite. ​Seungri was in the VIP room of a bar and got into a dispute with another patron who accidentally opened the door. CCTV footage and chat logs showed that Seungri and Yoo In-seok instead called gang members/thugs (through their connections) to the location to intimidate and threaten that patron in a back alley. From the Military Court to the Supreme Court, the act of calling thugs to threaten someone was not viewed as an action to 'save a girl,' but rather as a criminal act of thuggery. That is precisely why he was found guilty of that charge. If you want to claim it's a 'victimless crime' or twist an assault incitement charge into a heroic fanfiction story, please back it up with the actual court documents. Do you have the official verdict from the High Court or Supreme Court of Korea stating that Seungri is innocent and was just 'saving a girl'? If you do, show me the valid legal documents, not cherry-picked narratives from a fan group to support your assumptions.