Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 (@nthiggs) header
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 (@nthiggs) profile picture

ex Chief innovation partner at TNS SA. Retired survey statistician. Aeroplane nut. Author of All/other things being equal - ceteris paribus

Somerset West, South Africa
Joined July 2009
Photo by Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 (@nthiggs)Photo by Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 (@nthiggs)Photo by Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 (@nthiggs)Photo by Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 (@nthiggs)Photo by Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 (@nthiggs)Photo by Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 (@nthiggs)Photo by Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 (@nthiggs)Photo by Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 (@nthiggs)Photo by Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 (@nthiggs)Photo by Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 (@nthiggs)
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
Mamdani: “Estamos gastando decenas de miles de millones de dólares en matar a personas. Ese dinero podría haberse utilizado para facilitar la vida de nuestra gente. Siempre parece haber dinero para la guerra, pero no para alimentar a los pobres”
141
5,865
158
18,447
155,577
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
“You cannot bomb hospitals. You cannot bomb schools. You cannot slaughter kids. This is illegal.” @FranceskAlbs tells @ashfaaqC how Western media erased the law from their Gaza coverage. Watch the full episode here youtu.be/7xxq1c4WXv8
13
387
9
732
10,654
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
Read this for broader context and understanding
SOUTH AFRICA’S GRADUATION OUT OF AGOA DOESN’T MEAN WE WON'T HAVE ACCESS TO THE U.S. MARKET. WE WILL HAVE ACCESS, BUT WITH SLIGHTLY HIGHER TARIFFS. While we are now in a different political climate, I think it’s important to remember that aside from the issues the U.S. raised about South Africa’s eligibility to be part of AGOA, there have been some conversations for some time. For example, back in 2014, the focus, amongst other things, was on the reality that South Africa is an upper-middle-income country and should have graduated from AGOA to a full bilateral trade agreement with the U.S. Of course, we had our own complications, both because of the Southern African Customs Union (SACU), which we can’t sign bilateral trade agreements without, and because we lobbied to keep benefiting from this unilateral approach (AGOA). Looking back, if we had found a way to graduate out of AGOA, as we were pressured to do then, and started conversations about a trade agreement, we would be in a different climate than what we are seeing now. Of course, this doesn’t mean countries with trade agreements are spared from drastic changes in U.S. trade policy; we see those changes affecting countries like Canada. Beyond South Africa graduating out of AGOA, I think there is also confusion about the implications. Others frame it as a complete ban from the U.S. market, which is not the case. Simply put, as South Africa transitions out of AGOA, the country would face an additional Most Favoured Nation tariff of around 3.4% on top of the existing tariffs the current U.S. Administration added to various countries. Currently, some South African products enter the U.S. market at 12.5% tariffs (Liberation Day tariff). Without AGOA, these tariffs would rise to 15.9%, slightly reducing the competitiveness of some South African products in the U.S. market. Still, one could argue that while this would be a challenging path, it would not necessarily be as catastrophic as we have faced in the past, when we faced much higher U.S. tariffs and still managed to compete. Consider South Africa’s agriculture: in 2025, the South African farming sector faced tariffs of around 30%. Still, agricultural exports to the U.S. were strong. South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. in 2025 totalled US$504 million, down 3% from the previous year. During the higher “Liberation Day Tariffs”, some South African agricultural exporters took advantage of the 90-day pause in the second quarter of 2025 and exported more volume than usual. After this pause, exports cooled in the third and fourth quarters of 2025. Notably, South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. fell 11% in the third quarter of 2025, compared with the same period in 2024, to US$144 million. In the last quarter, South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. fell sharply by 39% to US$81 million. Still, the overall annual exports were encouraging. Even this year, South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. were strong. For example, South Africa's agricultural exports to the U.S. increased by 56% from the first quarter of 2026 to the second quarter of 2026, to US$123 million. The decline in U.S. tariffs, from 30% to 12.5%, among other factors, has been the major contributor to the increase in South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. The U.S. remains an important market for South African agriculture, accounting for about 4% of our agricultural exports. Main exports include citrus, berries, grapes, raisins, wine, fruit juices, apples, pears, apricots, and nuts. Again, South Africa's graduation from AGOA must be viewed in context and may not mean a catastrophe. This is not to understate the impact some industries may feel as the increase in tariffs slightly reduces their competitiveness. Still, we must manage the sentiment and narrative around this issue well. Above all, this yet again reminds us of the need to work hard to diversify South Africa’s export markets to growing regions such as Asia and the Middle East. But export diversification must be framed correctly; it is not a replacement for the U.S., EU, UK, Africa, and other markets. These remain key, and we must work to retain our access to them. --Wandile
4
54
145
11,570
The voice of reason
SOUTH AFRICA’S GRADUATION OUT OF AGOA DOESN’T MEAN WE WON'T HAVE ACCESS TO THE U.S. MARKET. WE WILL HAVE ACCESS, BUT WITH SLIGHTLY HIGHER TARIFFS. While we are now in a different political climate, I think it’s important to remember that aside from the issues the U.S. raised about South Africa’s eligibility to be part of AGOA, there have been some conversations for some time. For example, back in 2014, the focus, amongst other things, was on the reality that South Africa is an upper-middle-income country and should have graduated from AGOA to a full bilateral trade agreement with the U.S. Of course, we had our own complications, both because of the Southern African Customs Union (SACU), which we can’t sign bilateral trade agreements without, and because we lobbied to keep benefiting from this unilateral approach (AGOA). Looking back, if we had found a way to graduate out of AGOA, as we were pressured to do then, and started conversations about a trade agreement, we would be in a different climate than what we are seeing now. Of course, this doesn’t mean countries with trade agreements are spared from drastic changes in U.S. trade policy; we see those changes affecting countries like Canada. Beyond South Africa graduating out of AGOA, I think there is also confusion about the implications. Others frame it as a complete ban from the U.S. market, which is not the case. Simply put, as South Africa transitions out of AGOA, the country would face an additional Most Favoured Nation tariff of around 3.4% on top of the existing tariffs the current U.S. Administration added to various countries. Currently, some South African products enter the U.S. market at 12.5% tariffs (Liberation Day tariff). Without AGOA, these tariffs would rise to 15.9%, slightly reducing the competitiveness of some South African products in the U.S. market. Still, one could argue that while this would be a challenging path, it would not necessarily be as catastrophic as we have faced in the past, when we faced much higher U.S. tariffs and still managed to compete. Consider South Africa’s agriculture: in 2025, the South African farming sector faced tariffs of around 30%. Still, agricultural exports to the U.S. were strong. South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. in 2025 totalled US$504 million, down 3% from the previous year. During the higher “Liberation Day Tariffs”, some South African agricultural exporters took advantage of the 90-day pause in the second quarter of 2025 and exported more volume than usual. After this pause, exports cooled in the third and fourth quarters of 2025. Notably, South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. fell 11% in the third quarter of 2025, compared with the same period in 2024, to US$144 million. In the last quarter, South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. fell sharply by 39% to US$81 million. Still, the overall annual exports were encouraging. Even this year, South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. were strong. For example, South Africa's agricultural exports to the U.S. increased by 56% from the first quarter of 2026 to the second quarter of 2026, to US$123 million. The decline in U.S. tariffs, from 30% to 12.5%, among other factors, has been the major contributor to the increase in South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. The U.S. remains an important market for South African agriculture, accounting for about 4% of our agricultural exports. Main exports include citrus, berries, grapes, raisins, wine, fruit juices, apples, pears, apricots, and nuts. Again, South Africa's graduation from AGOA must be viewed in context and may not mean a catastrophe. This is not to understate the impact some industries may feel as the increase in tariffs slightly reduces their competitiveness. Still, we must manage the sentiment and narrative around this issue well. Above all, this yet again reminds us of the need to work hard to diversify South Africa’s export markets to growing regions such as Asia and the Middle East. But export diversification must be framed correctly; it is not a replacement for the U.S., EU, UK, Africa, and other markets. These remain key, and we must work to retain our access to them. --Wandile
1
1
1
63
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
I’ve never had a Muslim tell me what I can and can’t do. But Christians have been telling me what I can and can’t do my entire fucking life.
5,489
5,002
409
41,547
1,807,163
Folks, we are days away from an election in South Africa. If you see any poll, unless you are told the sample size, when and how it was done and who was interviewed, simply ignore what is said. Even if this info is given, unless it is a properly drawn sample, ignore it.
4
33
4
75
6,228
Any vox pops type poll on social media or in the street will tell you nothing about any likely result. Again, ignore. Any news outlet running a live phone-in type poll is just waiting your time. Move on.
1
8
672
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
I don't think @MYANC will ever begin to fathom how damaging their Secretary General has been to their brand. Is there really no one in this entire movement who can firmly advise Mr Mbalula to be quiet? Just for a few more days? Or give him a sedative? Nothing?
“Potholes will be there because we live in the situation of a climate change there are rains water the the streets get washed out” ANC SG Fikile Mbalula “We are not talking something that you know is falling from the sky we talking about what government is going to do to help” @MbalulaFikile
201
336
20
1,182
79,832
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
Friendly reminder that voter turnout will be SUPER IMPORTANT. Especially to my Joburg friends - if you have any interest in the outcome whatsoever, your decision to vote is hugely important. TURN OUT TO VOTE NEXT WEDNESDAY! AND PLAN TO DO SO EARLY (+take people along)
3
98
3
346
14,231
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
The DA and the mayor of CT disgust me.
The privilege of this perspective. What if that was your kids under the rubble? @geordinhl
1
33
76
1,066
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
This sponsored narrative from one, likely three, foreign governments seeking to sow religious discord in South Africa, cause destabilisation & spark violence. The Bell Pottinger Playbook: manufacture a controversy, amplify fear & turn communities against one another. A thread.
This quoted post is unavailable.
67
373
11
960
42,028
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
The Dots are Connecting @RediTlhabi and the picture is not pretty
South Africa, you are watching this nê? Note the talking points.....same as the ones articulated on US soil - "extreme left"...."radical Islam....." In South Africa's context? RUBBISH imported talking points. Funny those SA influencers are using the same words.
4
14
50
4,775
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
South Africa, you are watching this nê? Note the talking points.....same as the ones articulated on US soil - "extreme left"...."radical Islam....." In South Africa's context? RUBBISH imported talking points. Funny those SA influencers are using the same words.
Netanyahu: Unholy alliance between the extreme left and radical Islam. They destroyed France, and now they are destroying Britain. They will destroy the State of Israel. They will bring us to the brink of annihilation.
133
296
15
729
36,996
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
10
122
1
496
2,255
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
Smile. 23 factorial.
9
7
87
7,500
All the accounts saying that the protests in France are “Islamists” are pro Israel posting accounts. Go figure.
16
66
2
352
4,353
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota. To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically. Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country. Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case. Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve. In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota. The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
61,535
27,910
4,627
140,075
13,028,330
Do you want these bozos to do something similar here? No Starlink. Just no.
EXCLUSIVE: Elon Musk came to Donald Trump with the plan to throttle Ukraine’s use of SpaceX’s Starshield satellite internet network, sources have told the Telegraph. The tech billionaire made the proposal during the US President’s row with Volodymyr Zelensky over strikes on Russian oil refineries. ‘The reality is that they were both in it,’ a senior source said of Musk’s and Trump’s involvement. But after a night of carnage in Kyiv caused by the slowdown, Musk was alarmed about the possibility of adverse consumer reaction in Europe. The SpaceX boss then proceeded to tweet, blaming the US administration, and ultimately, President Trump for authorising the slowdown. ‘He tweeted out that he was innocent and that it was the US administration that did it,’ the source said.
6
104
Neil Higgs 💎 🌼 retweeted
EXCLUSIVE: Elon Musk came to Donald Trump with the plan to throttle Ukraine’s use of SpaceX’s Starshield satellite internet network, sources have told the Telegraph. The tech billionaire made the proposal during the US President’s row with Volodymyr Zelensky over strikes on Russian oil refineries. ‘The reality is that they were both in it,’ a senior source said of Musk’s and Trump’s involvement. But after a night of carnage in Kyiv caused by the slowdown, Musk was alarmed about the possibility of adverse consumer reaction in Europe. The SpaceX boss then proceeded to tweet, blaming the US administration, and ultimately, President Trump for authorising the slowdown. ‘He tweeted out that he was innocent and that it was the US administration that did it,’ the source said.
1,955
9,419
1,532
31,374
3,704,861