Current: CEO PitPro, https://xitter.cf/t.co/hegqP3BEid. Angel investor. Prior: Construction Tech Founder, Hardware VC, Veteran, MIT.

San Francisco, CA
Joined November 2011
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
We believe an ecosystem will grow around personal intelligence you own. We’re building it at @ghostai.
48
30
17
420
48,649
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
It's fascinating to look at the distribution of Nobel Prizes MIT has won over the last 75 years. In the last 25 years over 50%(!) of the prizes have been in Economics.
1
4
204
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
I think this is kind of cool. A few weeks ago TransAstra started to submit asteroids we have newly discovered to the Minor Planet Center just as a no cost contribution to the community. 🔭 . Here is a screenshot from the UI our telescope operators (and AIs) use to run the network. So far we have reported about ten but the numbers will grow over time. This is in addition to the thousands of known asteroids we report improved tracks on and many other things we keep for ourselves or report to our customers. We get paid for finding things in Cislunar space, but report these asteroids to give back to the community. Highlights from a recent latest batch: • 2026 OC4 (Apollo) — ~60–140 m, spotted in Space Force survey data and secured with automated follow-up • 2026 RB4 (Aten) — ~15–35 m, close approach ~4.9 lunar distances in September • 2026 RO39 — tiny (~4–8 m) but flew inside the Moon’s distance on 14 Sept • 2026 TD & 2026 PQ — recent TransAstra finds (Apollo & Amor) These are just a few of the thousands of objects our Theia software and globally distributed telescopes have pulled from the sky. Every detection improves planetary-defense awareness and builds the catalog of accessible targets for future in-space resource utilization (ISRU). You can’t mine what you can’t find. 🚀 #Asteroids #NEA #PlanetaryDefense #SpaceResources #TransAstra
3
5
1
53
8,651
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
you should vote for scott wiener if you live in sf, you've either already received your ballot, or you need to register to vote. if you're new to sf, welcome, may this place hold your dreams & ambitions with the utmost respect. i would encourage you to take part in protecting it and helping it grow, so that generations after us get to live in the only true optimistic city in the world. our community has forever been fighting to lower rents, to make it safer, and to elevate the natural beauty that blesses the city. on that ballot will be scott wiener vs connie chan. scott wiener is one of the most effective politicians in the country. connie chan is one of the most ineffective politicians. on the left & on the right, our country has been taken over by people who's political theory is that you come up with the solution first and then get into office to enact it, even if your solution does not work. we are being held hostage by people who cannot spell nuance, by left-wing populists that blocks decarbonization, and right-wing populists that blocks reindustrialization. if you are in san francisco, then you are aware that all the world depends on this city. here in this city are the folks with their hands on the wheel. the folks who do not understand nuance have created a dangerous world & a wrecked economy. all the world is held up right now by san francisco, the light of the future & the wealth of our nation is driven here. our city has problems. those problems have been either directly created or actively encouraged by connie chan. connie has blocked nearly every plan, policy, or program that builds housing & lowers rents that has ever been proposed. but nearly everything that has actually gotten passed, was literally written by or supported by scott wiener. in her time in sf, connie fought against transit, against bike lanes, against parks, and against housing project after housing project. scott has worked tirelessly to fix san francisco and california. for years, he was a lone soldier in pushing for policies that work, rather than ones that don't. and he has done this by understanding nuance. scott changes his mind based on evidence, because he doesn't care about the solution, he cares about fixing the problem. what does connie say she'll do when she gets into office? subsidize demand. what does scott want to do? build 8 million new homes. register to vote, vote scott
26
31
7
312
22,290
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
How long did it take to go from 2% to 50% adoption in the USA: - Cars: 15 years - Internet: 7.5 years - Computer: 19 years - Smartphone: 6.5 years - AI: just reached 2% today
98% of US households aren't paying for AI yet More charts in State of Markets II: a16z.news/p/state-of-markets…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The adoption timelines compare paid AI subscriptions (~2% US households per a16z data) to broader ownership/usage metrics for cars, internet, computers and smartphones. AI chatbot usage is already ~49% among US adults per recent surveys. a16z.news/p/state-of-mar… pewresearch.org/internet/2026/…
305
450
103
4,193
664,215
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
We have West Nile virus in the area around the Sultan Sea because as the sea recedes irrigation channels drain onto the exposed playa, pooling and creating habitats for mosquitoes. You might think that the obvious solution would be for a local government to hire a bulldozer contractor for half a day to extend the irrigation channel through the playa down to the current shore of the lake. But no, they have spent the last 20 years trying to track down helicopter pilots willing to spray pesticide on the playa, to almost no effect. We are not a serious people.
The White House has just said it wants to eliminate some mosquito species (and ticks) Is this good news? Yes! Ppl don't realize how bad they are, and how we already have the technology to do it! Here's the problem, the solutions we have, and why we haven't done anything yet:
9
8
1
194
16,428
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
After 9 years. 16K+ family homes. 500M sqft inside real homes covered, we know home robots are being built in wrong order. So we built Matic the way nature grows a child. Finally, sharing our vision: 1.⁠ ⁠Why robots get stuck at the demo 2.⁠ ⁠Why labs can't ship robots 3.⁠ ⁠Why we started with eyes, not hands 4.⁠ ⁠The 99.999% rule in robotics 5.⁠ ⁠Where Matic is going next 1. Why most robots get stuck at demos Robot demos look brilliant in a room arranged around its limitations: familiar lighting, predictable furniture, nothing troublesome on the floor. A family’s home makes no such accommodations. There are cables, toys, shifting rugs and, occasionally, dog poop. Yes, humanoids will need to avoid that too. Repeating a task under familiar conditions of uncluttered floors is not the same as handling an unfamiliar home with all its chaos. 2. Why labs can't ship robots SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) is how a robot maps its surroundings and locates itself within them. Ask most academics and they'll tell you it's a solved problem. But real homes are the most chaotic spaces that exist. There are glass doors that look like open doorways, mirrors, stairs, rugs, charging cables, and Legos placed all around. So ask yourself: if indoor mapping and navigation is "solved," where are the robots? Why aren't airports, hotels and grocery stores full of them? Calling it “solved” misses the question families actually care about: can I leave this thing alone and trust it? 3. Why we started with eyes, not hands Nature doesn't give birth to a fully working human. We took our cue from how nature develops humans: capabilities built on one another. Children learn to see before they learn to grab, and to grab before they learn to plan and handle the unexpected. Perception comes first. Manipulation follows. More complex responsibilities come after that. At every stage, the robot must earn the next job by doing its current one well enough. Before asking a robot to pick up a sock, we wanted it to understand where it was, where the sock was, and how to reach it. Most of the industry started at the top, with humanoids. We started at the bottom, with a robot whose job is to see and move through a home precisely with 1cm accuracy in any lighting condition. Floor cleaning gave that foundation an immediately useful job. It forced us to confront navigation, clutter, privacy and everyday reliability before reaching for more complex chores. The floor cleaner isn’t a detour from our larger ambition. It is how we’re building toward it. 4. The 99.999% rule in robotics At 90%, one in ten decisions is wrong, and a robot makes thousands in a single clean. That's the robot that bumps, gets lost, and falls down the stairs. Every extra nine is a new mountain. The failures get rarer, harder to find, and exponentially harder to fix. They barely even happen until they happen in your home. Matic's visual SLAM runs at 99.999% in 16K+ homes. We’re the ONLY unsupervised home robot at scale with pure vision-only full autonomy. If you ask us, the gap between 80% and 99.999% is where our 9 years of engineering went. We close that gap inside real homes. When Matic handles something imperfectly, it saves a short clip and keeps it on the device. It only leaves if the family chooses to share it. If they do, it gets labeled, fed back into the model, and every Matic gets smarter, including theirs. Families control what leaves their homes. We do the work of making the product better. Better robots earn trust > trust brings more homes > and more homes teach the robot more. 5. Where Matic is going next Phase one was perception and it's nearly done. Matic has covered 500 million square feet, 400K miles in thousands of real lived-in homes. Now phase two is going to be about manipulation. And our idea is to build a robot that doesn't just move through your home, but acts in it to eliminate even more chores. Each step must be useful today, not justified by something we promise tomorrow. The evolution of Matic is the revolution. The goal isn’t to put the most impressive humanoid in your living room. It’s giving your family time and energy back through robots that earn your trust, protect your privacy, and help without becoming another responsibility. More time for each other. Less work getting in the way. That’s Matic. Get yours today at maticrobots.com
144
222
100
1,289
725,762
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
I'm thrilled to announce that PitPro has deployed our first production unit to Kal Tire in Calgary! In robotics demos are easy but deployments are hard. Getting our robot onto the floor of a Kal Tire store is a defining moment for us and proof ready for the real world.
5
6
17
500
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
Incredible photos of the San Francisco mountain lion — now tranquilized and removed — by @manuelorbegozo Story by @aidinvaziri and @stjbs sfchronicle.com/bayarea/arti…
84
211
114
2,070
517,628
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
Everyone remembers what happened when Google tried to give San Francisco free citywide Internet in 2005 or when Mark Zuckerberg gave $75 million to SF General Hospital in 2015 after his wife did her residency there.
People often ask why today's tech wealth doesn't go towards more public works, like libraries, universities, and museums during the late 1800s. As far as I can tell the answer is that they would literally not be allowed to be built. In 2014, George Lucas, a long-time Bay Area resident who built Lucasfilm in the Bay, wanted to build a museum in the Presidio as a gift to the people of San Francisco, to be personally funded to the tune of ~$700 million. The Presidio Trust rejected it. He then tried to build it in his wife's hometown of Chicago, but local nonprofit Friends of the Parks sued and held the project up for two years, long enough for Lucas to give up on the city. The Lucas Museum of Narrative Art will finally open in Los Angeles next month after more than a decade of planning, eight years of construction, and over $1 billion personally spent by Lucas. Meanwhile, San Francisco has built no major museum projects since the 2016 expansion of SFMOMA, and no new libraries since the North Beach Branch in 2014. Public works, like so many other things, are bottlenecked not by donor will or available funding but by vetocracy
61
122
8
3,271
714,516
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
It’s rude to ask - a woman her age - a man his salary - a robot deployer how many robots they’ve deployed for non-research use cases
26
34
15
590
40,523
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
hiring for hardware right now we have more customer demand than we can practically service (which means new use cases) and need to scale the next generation of power systems for a bunch of future products. DM me the most ambitious thing you’ve built + why you want to collab.
6
9
1
162
18,189
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
DSA Supervisor @JackieFielder_ is back on her bullshit. She wants to ban all R&D in the Mission, and it looks like she's going to get away with it bc the rest of the BoS isn't paying attention. Sorry this has to be a thread, but it's fucking insane and you need to know details.
74
111
67
1,691
928,191
11 years later, we’ve now legalized tall, dense housing near transit stops across the state of California. Thank you @GavinNewsom for signing #SB79 today.
14
21
3
347
38,938
Drone and pad footage from Isar Aerospace's Spectrum launch. You can see it avoided the pad when it came down.
169
637
200
3,592
356,483
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
Today, we unveiled two new breakthrough AI weather models, AI-WX and AI-S2S. Accelerated by @nvidia GPUs and leveraging the NVIDIA Omniverse Blueprint for Earth-2, these models are transforming weather forecasting: 🚀 Speed: Our AI models run 1,000 times faster than traditional physics-based models. 🌦️ Accuracy: Offering forecasts up to 20 days with AI-WX and up to 45 days with AI-S2S. 🔍 Precision: Large ensemble forecasts capture a full range of possible weather outcomes. Read more: spire.com/press-release/spir…
1
12
2
46
3,899
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
"Phase behavior of Cacio and Pepe sauce" > increasing starch mitigates the formation of protein clumps cooking is science! arxiv.org/pdf/2501.00536
1
2
786
Our CEO @StefanESA reflects on the demise of Cruise and what it means for the autonomy industry. Read the post 👉 polymathrobotics.com/blog/eu…
1
2
328
Jeremy Conrad retweeted
The materials you get from recycling 1 kWh of old lithium ion batteries can be used to make more than 1 kWh of lithium ion batteries. energy.gov/eere/vehicles/art…
11
111
27
581
83,821