
Assistant Professor of Psychology @occidental. Hormones, behavior, open science, pictures of primates
- Tweets418
- Following321
- Followers393
- Likes1.3K

ALT My own view on anisogamy and current political debates in the US is: a pox on both your houses. Both sides are committing the naturalistic fallacy (i.e., confusing is with ought). Each side wants to enlist Science to determine how we ought to organize our society, but science can’t do that. It can’t substitute for priests, pastors, politicians, and other community leaders. It can't substitute for the debate and compromise among members of a community regarding the social rules and roles they want to live by. The reason is: scientific concepts and theories are always subject to challenge. Today, most evolutionary biologists regard anisogamy as the best approach to defining females and males, but not all agree, and tomorrow new theories or evidence could overturn the current consensus. And that's true for any scientific concept or theory. Basing humans rights and responsibilities on scientific concepts and theories would be disastrous for human rights because new science could undermi...






































