nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 (@nbarrocas) profile picture
Lisbon, Portugal
Joined August 2008
Photo by nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 (@nbarrocas)Photo by nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 (@nbarrocas)Photo by nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 (@nbarrocas)Photo by nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 (@nbarrocas)Photo by nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 (@nbarrocas)Photo by nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 (@nbarrocas)Photo by nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 (@nbarrocas)Photo by nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 (@nbarrocas)
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
Up to $5.5M to move your startup to Qatar. Just an MVP gets you in the door. The Startup Qatar Investment Program (backed by QDB) funds tech startups to launch or expand in Qatar. Two tracks: START: up to $1.1M if you have a proof of concept or MVP GROW: up to $5.5M if you're already established and expanding What else you get: - Entrepreneur visa + flexible work visa - Registration and license fees waived - Subsidized housing - Subsidized co-working space - Access to R&D and innovation grants - Mentoring, training + help hiring talent and interns - Your product showcased at exhibitions Sectors they want: - AI & ML, B2B SaaS, FinTech, HealthTech, Cybersecurity, Climate Tech, Robotics + more - Not on the list? It's open to any innovative startup Apply link below 👇 startupqatar.qa/en/investmen… Bookmark this + tag a founder looking for a new market.
262
489
205
7,542
3,144,829
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
⚠️ ALERT: Revolut falls for a FAKE government request, exposing sensitive personal information of customers in a disturbing data breach. Revolut disclosed that it complied with a fraudulent government request using a spoofed official email and valid credentials, exposing PII belonging to a group of customers. The leaked data reportedly includes passports/driving licences, verification selfies, names, DOBs, occupations, home addresses, emails, phone numbers, IBANs, account statements and full transaction histories, including Bitcoin activity. No customer funds were reportedly lost and Revolut says its systems were not hacked. The company has notified affected users and regulators and blocked the source. Social-engineering attacks are on the rise, with attackers increasingly exploiting human trust and weak verification processes rather than technical vulnerabilities.
192
372
143
1,586
658,905
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
🔻IN 2016, A JAPANESE SCIENTIST WON THE NOBEL PRIZE FOR PROVING YOUR BODY EATS ITSELF TO HEAL. THEN THE FOOD INDUSTRY PRETENDED IT NEVER HAPPENED. Dr. Yoshinori Ohsumi won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for discovering the mechanisms of autophagy. The word means "self-eating." It is the process by which your cells detect damaged proteins, broken organelles, and even invading bacteria—and consume them. Your body digests its own waste, recycles the parts, and rebuilds itself from the inside out. This is not a theory. This won the highest award in science. Autophagy is your body's built-in detox system. It clears out the cellular garbage that causes cancer, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and every degenerative disease. When autophagy is active, your cells are clean, efficient, and nearly impossible to infect. Here is the problem. Autophagy only activates when you stop eating. The moment food enters your system, insulin rises and mTOR activates. Both of these shut autophagy down completely. Your body switches from cleaning mode to building mode. If you eat every two to three hours—which is exactly what every dietitian, doctor, and food company tells you to do—your cells never get the chance to clean themselves. The "eat six small meals a day" advice is not health guidance. It is a business model. Every meal is a transaction. Every snack is a sale. The food industry needs you eating constantly. The pharmaceutical industry needs your cells full of garbage so they can sell you the treatment. Fasting is free. It requires no product, no prescription, and no appointment. It activates a Nobel Prize-winning healing mechanism that is already inside you. They did not hide this science. They just made sure you were too busy eating to ever use it. Stop eating for 16 hours. Let your body do what it was designed to do. Clean house. The world must know the truth. SHARE IT.
50
1,456
70
3,735
96,759
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
A plausible explanation of why they want to ban cash.
46
319
14
1,307
128,709
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
$1M was rich in 1990 now it’s $4M by the time you retire, it’ll be $16M this is incredibly important to understand
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
156
366
30
4,477
720,055
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
A Muslim country is warning Europe about Islamism. Not Christian conservatives. Not the "far right". Not anyone you can wave away as an Islamophobe. The United Arab Emirates. The UAE has spent years taking a hard line against political Islam and the Muslim Brotherhood, which the country classifies as a terrorist organisation. And in June 2026, the UAE's ambassador to the EU, Mohammed Ismail Al Sahlawi, sat in the European Parliament at a conference with this title: "Muslim Brotherhood: a real threat to Europe." Hard to misread. The warning was about the Brotherhood's methods. Infiltrating European societies and institutions, influencing political decisions, spreading extremist ideology. Read that again. A Muslim country is warning Europe about political Islam. And here is what matters most! Islamism is not only the man with a rifle or a suicide vest. That is the outermost, violent expression of it. Islamism can also work slowly. And politically. Through organisations, universities, religious institutions, activism, lobbying, political and institutional influence. That is exactly why it is so dangerous to look only for the man with the bomb belt. Because Islamism can arrive in a suit. It can hold a university degree. It can run an organisation. It can sit close to political decision makers. And it can learn to speak the West's own language about tolerance, rights and diversity, while working for values that collide with liberal democracy. And no. This is not just something the UAE claims. Britain's own government has investigated the Muslim Brotherhood. The British review found that Brotherhood-associated and Brotherhood-influenced groups in the UK had, at various points, held significant influence over the largest Muslim student organisation, national Muslim organisations in dialogue with the government, charities and some mosques. The same review concluded that parts of the Brotherhood's ideology and activities run counter to democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, equality, and mutual respect and tolerance between faiths. So this is not only about terror. It is about ideology. And now comes the part that should stop every European in their tracks. The UAE has become so concerned about Islamist radicalisation at British universities that British universities have been removed from the list of institutions where Emirati students can receive state scholarships. Young Emiratis are still free to study in Britain. With their own money. The UAE simply will not pay for it anymore. A person with direct knowledge of the discussions put it plainly to the Financial Times: "They don't want their kids to be radicalised on campus." Sit with that for a second. A Muslim, Arab country is worried about sending its Muslim young people to Britain, because it fears they will be radicalised there. If that does not trigger some soul-searching in Europe, I don't know what will. Because the UAE's point is precisely this. You make a fatal mistake if you only start caring about Islamism once someone picks up a weapon. The ideological process may have started years earlier. The UAE's foreign minister, Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, has said: "Daesh, Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups have fed off a wider current of extremist ideas." He pointed specifically at political Islamist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood, which in his view have spent decades spreading those narratives. He called them "backward-looking". And said they "reject open, pluralistic societies." This is a Muslim foreign minister saying it. And there is something else I want to make very clear! THE UAE IS NOT THE WEST. It is not Europe. It is not a Western liberal democracy. It is a Muslim, Arab country with a different culture, a different form of government and different traditions. And there are aspects of the UAE's political system and human rights record that we would never accept in a Western democracy. This is not to be romanticised. But the UAE has fought political Islamism for decades, an ideology its leadership believes has undermined and destabilised the Middle East. And which they now openly warn is seeking influence in Europe and the rest of the Western world. Their foreign minister has spoken about the need to show that you can be "modern, Arab and Muslim." That distinction is one Europe desperately needs to understand. You can be a Muslim and still reject political Islam, extremism, antisemitism and religious intolerance. And notice one more thing. THE VIEW OF WOMEN IS PART OF THAT FIGHT. Abdullah bin Zayed has directly criticised Islamist ideologies for their "denigration of women's role in society." The UAE has not just talked about it. The country has made women's education, economic participation and leadership official state policy. Women are to be educated. They are to work. They are to be able to start businesses. They are to take part economically and politically. And they are to sit at the table where decisions are made. Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, ruler of Dubai and the UAE's vice president and prime minister, established the UAE Gender Balance Council with the stated aim of reducing the gender gap and strengthening women's participation in leadership and decision making. And the UAE's president, Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, MBZ, leads a Muslim country that has made religious coexistence part of its national story. In Abu Dhabi, a mosque, a church and a synagogue stand side by side in the Abrahamic Family House. Think about that contrast. A Muslim country is saying: Keep Islam. Fight Islamism. Let women study, work and lead. Let Christians be Christians. Let Jews be Jews. And fight the political and religious movements that want to replace pluralism with their own ideology. And yes. That includes the people who support, legitimise and clear the path for those movements while believing they are defending tolerance and diversity. Including when they end up working against the very Western values, freedom, equality, democracy and religious liberty, that gave them the opportunity to do so in the first place. History has an old term for people who end up serving an ideology whose actual goals they do not share: "Useful idiots." They do not have to be Islamists themselves. That is the whole point. They only have to be useful to those who are. And this is what Europe has to learn to separate: Islam is a religion. Islamism is a political ideology. And Islamist extremism is not "diversity". You can defend Muslims' full right to believe and practise their faith, and at the same time say a resounding NO to movements that want to use religion for political power, parallel societies, extremism, or the gradual erosion of the society that gave them the freedom to be here. Tolerance does not mean tolerating intolerance until it has grown strong enough to turn on you. When a Muslim country pulls its state scholarships away from British universities out of fear of Islamist radicalisation, while parts of Europe are still afraid to even name the problem, the question is no longer whether there is a problem. The question is who understood the seriousness of it. And right now, it isn't us!
170
2,666
213
5,250
197,807
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
Hoje soubeste que entraste na universidade. Parabéns — a sério! Guarda o print, abraça quem te aturou no secundário. E depois lê isto, porque é o que ninguém te vai dizer na sessão de boas-vindas. Vais entrar numa universidade que quase não mudou em cinquenta anos — e sair, em 2030, para um mundo que terá mudado tudo. As empresas estão a reorganizar-se em torno da IA. A forma de trabalhar está a mudar. E os empregos mais ameaçados são precisamente os de início de carreira: os teus, daqui a quatro anos. Não te digo isto para te assustar. Digo-to para que uses os próximos anos com estratégia, não em piloto automático. Usa a IA todos os dias — mas ao contrário de toda a gente. A maioria vai usá-la para tornar o trabalho mais fácil. Erro. A IA é traiçoeira: dá-te a sensação de ter aprendido sem teres aprendido. O perigo não é a fraude; é a atrofia. Aprender exige esforço — não há atalho, nunca houve. Regra simples: se foi a IA que fez, tu não sabes fazer. Usa-a como treinador, para te fazer perguntas, apontar erros e exigir mais — nunca como empregado que faz por ti. Nasceste na melhor altura possível. Sei que te dizem o contrário. Mas quando tudo está a ser disrompido, tudo está ao alcance. Os porteiros do costume — o diploma certo, o apelido certo, os vinte anos de casa — estão a cair. Nunca foi tão barato construir alguma coisa e mostrá-la ao mundo. Não precisas de autorização de ninguém. Precisas de começar. E não lixes as tuas arestas. Se és um bocado estranho, se não encaixas: ótimo. Quem muda as coisas quase nunca é quem encaixa confortavelmente. Por fim, a estratégia ótima, validada por uma amostra estatisticamente irrepreensível: estuda o que quiseres — Medicina, Direito, História, Engenharia, tanto faz — e vem fazer a 42, ao mesmo tempo ou logo a seguir. Sem propinas, sem professores, sem aulas: projetos, colegas e o hábito de aprender sozinho, que é o único ativo que a IA não desvaloriza. (Declaração de interesses: fundei a 42. Declaração de factos: continua a ser verdade.) O mundo para onde vais sair ainda não existe. Vais ter de o construir tu. Começa hoje.
12
30
9
247
20,150
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
As foretold in the prophecy
Did you know Elon Musk was weirdly "predicted" in a Wernher von Braun book nearly 80 years ago? In his 1948 novel *Project Mars*, von Braun describes a future Martian government led by a figure called the "Elon." It's not a person's name, but a title for the head of government. Still, considering Elon Musk's lifelong obsession with Mars, this has to be one of the strangest coincidences in space history!
4,244
7,031
812
57,077
7,265,942
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
Another $8.5M stolen this morning 🤦‍♂️ Audited code Zero exploits Perfectly legal vote 3rd major DAO attack this year The attacker started with 2 ETH out of Tornado Cash and bought governance tokens That was enough to seize 100% voting power in 4 of the 5 USDC vaults and about 91% of the ETH Meta Vault at Term Labs Then he did exactly what you would expect Proposed sending himself the money Voted yes Executed 😂 2,843 ETH gone about $6.87M and 1.68M USDC swapped to DAI Can’t have Circle freeze your funds of course PeckShield and CertiK confirmed it on-chain and the crazy part is that Term Labs' contracts are fine Audited Nothing bypassed No reentrancy No oracle manipulation No keys lost Someone just bought full control of the DAO for 2 ETH…
86
72
40
890
129,984
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
Mushrooms evolved into psilocybin twice. A fascinating new study has revealed that psilocybin—the psychedelic compound in magic mushrooms—arose not once, but twice, through entirely independent evolutionary events in distant corners of the fungal kingdom. In the familiar Psilocybe species, psilocybin is assembled via a well-characterized four-enzyme pathway. Yet when scientists examined certain small, drab fiber cap mushrooms (from genera like Inocybe and allies), they discovered a completely unrelated biochemical assembly line: different genes, different enzymes, different intermediate steps—yet the end product is chemically identical. This is a remarkable case of convergent evolution: two lineages, with no shared ancestry for this trait, each invented their own molecular machinery to manufacture the same powerful molecule. Why fungi bother making psilocybin at all is still unclear. Some hypothesize it serves as a defense chemical (the blue bruising reaction in damaged Psilocybe tissue hints at this), while others propose roles in inter-species signaling or entirely unknown ecological functions. Whatever the benefit, it was evidently strong enough for natural selection to favor it twice, in very different habitats. The finding also carries immediate practical value. With psilocybin advancing in clinical trials for treatment-resistant depression and other conditions, having two distinct biosynthetic pathways gives researchers multiple genetic toolkits for engineering microbes or yeast to produce the compound in bioreactors—potentially making therapeutic-grade psilocybin far cheaper and more scalable. In the end, nature quietly solved the same chemical puzzle twice, deep in the soil, millions of years apart—and only now are we stumbling across its elegant, redundant handiwork. [“Dissimilar Reactions and Enzymes for Psilocybin Biosynthesis in Inocybe and Psilocybe Mushrooms.” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2025]
18
77
8
567
64,260
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
🚨 Humans Can Now Survive Without Breathing — And This Is REAL What if humans could survive without breathing—even for a short time? American researchers at Boston Children’s Hospital have developed a groundbreaking injectable oxygen system that can keep people alive when their lungs completely fail. It sounds unreal, but this life-saving technology is very real and could change emergency medicine forever. The invention is a special liquid foam filled with millions of microscopic bubbles packed with pure oxygen. Each bubble is wrapped in a fat-like layer, similar to natural cell membranes in the human body. When injected into the bloodstream, these tiny oxygen carriers travel through blood vessels and release oxygen directly into the body’s tissues, completely bypassing the lungs. This means that during extreme emergencies—such as drowning, severe asthma attacks, blocked airways, or major trauma—the injection can provide 15 to 30 crucial minutes of oxygen. Those minutes can mean the difference between life and death, giving doctors time to reopen airways, restore breathing, or perform urgent procedures. What makes this even more fascinating is how space-like the idea is. Just like astronauts rely on artificial life-support systems in space, this technology acts as internal life support, keeping the body alive when normal breathing is impossible. From emergency rooms and battlefields to future space missions, this breakthrough could help humans survive where oxygen is scarce. ✨ Once science fiction… now real science. The future of life support may not be a machine—it may be an injection.
33
99
21
340
9,066
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
🚨BREAKING: A revolutionary new cancer treatment called Histotripsy is showing incredible promise by literally liquefying tumors using focused sound waves—no surgery, no chemo, and no radiation needed. Developed by pioneers Dr. Zhen Xu and the late Dr. Charles Cain at the University of Michigan, this FDA-approved technology is now being used at leading hospitals like Johns Hopkins and the Cleveland Clinic. How it works: - A robotic arm delivers precise high-intensity ultrasound waves straight to the tumor. - These waves create tiny gas bubbles inside cancer cells that rapidly expand and collapse. - The mechanical force destroys the tumor cells, turning the mass into liquid debris that the body naturally clears away. - It also appears to stimulate the immune system to better recognize and attack remaining cancer cells. - Because it relies on mechanical disruption rather than heat or radiation, it spares healthy surrounding tissue. Patients often undergo the quick outpatient procedure and go home the same day. It is currently treating liver tumors, with trials expanding to kidney and brain cancers. This could be a game-changer in the fight against cancer. H/T David J Harris Jr
41
796
25
1,805
36,701
It's time to stop this, we are being led by non-elected people that are doing whatever they want/need to protected the installed powers.
BREAKING: The EU is taking four of its own members to court. Ireland. Spain. France. The Netherlands. For refusing to adopt the EU's cybersecurity directive. Financial penalties on the table. Four sovereign nations decided the law wasn't right for them. The EU's response wasn't negotiation. It was litigation. This is the pattern that keeps repeating. Poland vetoes censorship laws. Pressure follows. Countries resist MiCA timelines. Penalties threatened. Now four nations refuse a cybersecurity directive. Court proceedings launched. The EU doesn't ask twice. It sues. The same bloc telling the world it values democracy. Is punishing member states for exercising it.
4
34
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
BREAKING: The EU is taking four of its own members to court. Ireland. Spain. France. The Netherlands. For refusing to adopt the EU's cybersecurity directive. Financial penalties on the table. Four sovereign nations decided the law wasn't right for them. The EU's response wasn't negotiation. It was litigation. This is the pattern that keeps repeating. Poland vetoes censorship laws. Pressure follows. Countries resist MiCA timelines. Penalties threatened. Now four nations refuse a cybersecurity directive. Court proceedings launched. The EU doesn't ask twice. It sues. The same bloc telling the world it values democracy. Is punishing member states for exercising it.
1,239
4,802
552
17,526
1,457,558
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
The European Parliament voted AGAINST Chat Control. 314 to 276. And it passed anyway. Let me tell you how: they needed 361 votes to say no. On the last day before vacation. Every empty seat counted as a yes. They lost the vote. They won the law. That’s not democracy. That’s a trick. #ChatControl
724
10,491
537
46,918
1,005,974
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
This is how “DEMOCRACY” works in Europe: ⛔️ 314 vote AGAINST mass surveillance. ✅ 276 vote FOR it. MASS SURVEILLANCE WINS. Then the same bureaucratic hypocrites travel the world lecturing everyone about democracy and their so-called “European values.” WELCOME TO THE EUSSR.
🚨 EVERY EUROPEAN NEEDS TO KNOW THIS: The European Union is turning into an anti-democratic surveillance apparatus. In March, the European Parliament REJECTED the extension of “Chat Control.” So what did Brussels do? While everybody is distracted from the World Cup, they furtively brought it back through a rarely used procedure and are trying again. The goal is to allow private communications to be scanned under a derogation from normal ePrivacy protections. They’ll have access to your private messages and your photos. And, as always, mass surveillance is being sold to you under the banner of “safety.” The EU bureaucrats do not trust you. They urgently want the infrastructure to surveil you. And when its own Parliament votes the wrong way, the bureaucratic and anti-democratic machine simply finds another procedure and tries again. The European Union is not protecting democracy. It is becoming its enemy. And almost all CONSERVATIVES members of the parliament voted in favor of this Orwellian plan. And now imagine a combination of governmental surveillance AND Palantir. SCARY!!!! SHARE THIS. Europeans deserve to know what Brussels is doing to their privacy.
449
8,359
323
22,227
413,943
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
Ich habe heute versucht, die Chatkontrolle zu stoppen. Am Wochenende mussten Sibylle Berg und ich Parlamentspräsidentin Metsola schriftlich mitteilen, dass das Durchprügeln der Chatkontrolle im Eilverfahren leider gegen die Geschäftsordnung des EU-Parlaments verstößt. Während Metsola der interessierten Presse daraufhin (fälschlicherweise) mitteilte, dass das schon alles seine Richtigkeit habe, warten wir immer noch auf ihre Antwort. Deshalb wollte ich es ihr heute bei der Eröffnungssitzung in Straßburg noch einmal erklären. Und musste erstaunt feststellen, dass die Präsidentin doch Regeln kennt: Exakt nach 60 Sekunden hat sie mir das Mikrophon abgestellt. (regelkonform, wird aber selten gemacht) Dabei hätte ich noch einiges zu sagen gehabt: "Frau Präsidentin, Sie wachen nach Artikel 22 über dieses Regelwerk (mit der ausgedruckten Geschäftsordnung wedelnd) - erklären Sie den Eilantrag für unzulässig. Wir sind hier schließlich nicht auf Malta! Die aktuelle Fassung der Geschäftsordnung überreiche ich Ihnen gerne persönlich. In der MEP-Bar." Wie es nun weitergeht? Morgen wird über das Eilverfahren abgestimmt, obwohl diese Abstimmung gar nicht stattfinden dürfte. Wenn der Antrag erfolgreich ist, kommt die Chatkontrolle Donnerstagmittag zur Abstimmung ins Plenum. Um sie noch zu stoppen, müssten 361 Abgeordnete - eine qualifizierte Mehrheit - DAGEGEN stimmen. Die schlechte Nachricht: Donnerstag ist der letzte Tag vor der Sommerpause und viele MEPs dürften bereits auf dem Weg in den Urlaub sein. Ein Schelm, wer Böses denkt bei dieser Terminierung... Smiley! Wenn die Chatkontrolle durchgeht, dürfen die Plattformen (also die US-Tech-Bros) wieder & weiterhin fröhlich & ganz legal Ihre Nachrichten scannen. Schreiben Sie also gefälligst etwas unterhaltsamer in den kommenden Wochen... ZwinkerSmiley!
1,136
9,321
909
34,407
3,690,935
nbarrocas ⚡️🔋 retweeted
If your exchange loses its MiCA licence, it must wind down EU operations with a process to withdraw your assets. Move them to Ledger Wallet™, secured by your Ledger signer, and they sit under your direct control.
141
47
9
350
35,521