origin retweeted
Is it just me or does it seem like literally nothing is moving in the market
At least not on Robinhood which I am mostly watching
Haven't seen so much flatness on the charts collectively
ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247 moving though 😌
origin retweeted
“Bitcoin is a stool. It’s got three legs.”
Holders, nodes, miners. The miners’ leg gets shorter every halving.
@CincoDoggos on @TheBlockRunner’s Space: NAT is the shim. ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247
origin retweeted
Replying to @Web3Insect
Security is the most important aspect for Bitcoin.
Far more important than 21m cap.
No security, no value.
Everyone wants the vault.
Almost no one asks who is still willing to stand outside it.
Bitcoin’s security is a wage, not a vibe.
That wage gets cut on a schedule.
Fees never replaced it.
Miners do not hash for free.
ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247 is the extra wage that clears with the same block.
No premine.
No founder.
No change to the 21M.
The network can keep growing.
The guard still has to get paid.
$DMT-NAT
origin retweeted
中文社区领导人一直谈论DMT-NAT是每个人越研究就会越兴奋的一件事情,就是怕你不去深挖这些知识,一旦你去深挖了解,你一定会上瘾,NAT不会让所有人失望😂
Really enjoyed this one. Love seeing the $dmt-nat folks open to doing real proof of work on the Bitcoin chain. That's been our ask the whole time.
Pumped for the #NATbomb and the signal it will send that NAT is here to come alongside Bitcoin and solve a real issue looming on the horizon.
origin retweeted
忠哥今天亲自步道了一个矿工,现场看到这个矿工的钱包挖到了BTC+NAT 矿工说这个东西未来很值钱,这个视频告诉了大家比特币区块产出的资产可以说PK市场上99%的币,
大家认同吗?
origin retweeted
The NATbomb
200 people put in $5 each, rent 25 PH of hashrate for a day, and take a 1 in 17 shot at mining a Bitcoin block.
@CincoDoggos lays it out on @TheBlockRunner’s Space. ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247
origin retweeted
Binance makes $15B a year and just quit mining Bitcoin.
Genesis Digital pivoted to AI. @FoundryServices's CEO stepped down, then liked a @natgmi tweet the same day.
The security budget problem is already here and the ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247 community is the only one preparing for it.
We discuss 👇
Downside Of Building In Public | Retail Signaling | Binance Pool Shutdown | TBR #336
Hash from Prism was supposed to join us this week, but didn't show up, so we talk about what the internet does to founders, from the backlash after his MCG livestream to promising teams like Printr that folded under public pressure. Then we walk through @iman_blockrun's FOMO experiment, turning $500 into $500,000 with only a few high-conviction trades and preset sell targets.
From there we ask whether crypto is still an opportunity for the little guy. Innovation has stalled into recycled launchpad metas, @RobinhoodCrypto has listed exactly one token while promoting projects not from the trenches, and Google Trends shows the rest of the world searching for crypto while America looks away. We close with the biggest story of the week: @binance shut down its Bitcoin mining operation, Genesis Digital pivoted to AI, and Foundry's CEO liked a @natgmi tweet the same day he stepped down. We break down Bitcoin's security budget problem, why it is bigger than quantum, and why we think the community that sees it coming is the one building a fix.
The mining news is the part we cannot stop thinking about. If even Binance cannot make Bitcoin mining profitable, every smaller miner is running the same math, and a network meant to secure a $400 trillion asset cannot run on hope. Nobody wants to talk about it because the obvious fixes break what people love about Bitcoin. That is exactly why we keep pushing ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247: it funds miners without touching the 21 million cap, and the more people who see that, the more tickets we hold in the lottery that decides who gets noticed.
YouTube 🔗 youtu.be/kFj8zPQOgpI
origin retweeted
Just like he has to answer to the quantum threat. He’ll have to answer to the declining security budget.
Which is a significantly bigger threat than from quantum.
Quantum affects every aspect of our digital lives.
This will be solved because everyone has a vested interest to solve quantum.
The declining security budget is unique to Bitcoin and therefore significantly more important to solve because a lot less people have a vested interest in it. This is why it’s a major threat.
Hence, this is very important for Mr. Saylor.
origin retweeted
矿池退潮与安全预算觉醒:币安关停事件下的 #NAT 价值重估
一、币安矿池关停:一场注定到来的收缩
2026年10月13日,币安发布公告,宣布将于11月10日永久关停币安矿池及所有相关服务,涵盖矿池宝、云算力、交易加速器,乃至Telegram算力提醒和矿池API等边缘功能。矿工被要求在一个月内将算力迁移至其他矿池,逾期提交的份额将不再被接受或记账。
公告措辞克制,仅称“持续评估产品及服务的一部分”。但数据比公告诚实得多:截至2025年底,币安矿池名义算力约26EH/s,占全网2.3%,排名第九;而到关停前夕,其实际出块算力已萎缩至约9.1EH/s,市场份额仅剩0.85%,较名义数据缩水近七倍。在Foundry USA、AntPool、F2Pool三家合计吞噬全网六成以上出块份额的市场格局下,币安矿池既非最大,也非最赚钱,关停只是时间问题。
这不是孤立事件。2026年7月,日本SBI Crypto关闭了持有约2%哈希率的矿池;曾为全球最大矿池之一的Poolin申请Chapter 11破产保护,德州业务累计亏损约4590万美元后彻底关停。行业性退潮正在加速——费率战导致多数池子难以为继,预计2026至2027年将洗牌至仅存三四家巨头。
二、深层危机:减半机制下的安全预算悬崖
矿池退潮只是表象,真正的结构性危机在更深层。
比特币的安全模型建立在矿工收入之上,而矿工收入由两部分构成:区块奖励和交易费用。2024年4月第四次减半已将区块奖励从6.25BTC降至3.125BTC,2028年将进一步降至1.5625BTC。研究机构警告,如果当前趋势持续,比特币可能在7至11年内面临51%攻击风险,甚至引发“死亡螺旋”。当前矿工收入中交易费占比仅约0.6%,远不足以弥补区块奖励的指数级下降。
这意味着一个根本性悖论:比特币的安全性依赖于算力竞争,而算力竞争依赖于矿工收入,矿工收入却正在被协议层的减半机制系统性侵蚀。 矿工收入下降→算力退出→安全性降低→价格下跌→更多矿工退出的“死亡螺旋”并非理论假设,而是减半周期中可预见的现实风险。
比特币社区提出了多种方案:提高交易费占比会损害比特币作为支付工具的价值主张;修改协议引入通胀则与比特币的核心设计理念相悖。在协议层之外寻找新的补贴来源,正在从“可选方案”变为“必然选择”。而 $NAT,恰好站在了这个结构性缺口的正中央。
三、 $NAT 的机制设计:从区块数据中发现价值
NAT(Non-Arbitrary Token)的核心设计可以用一句话概括:代币发行量不由任何团队设定,而由比特币区块数据中的bits字段内生决定。
bits字段是比特币区块中挖矿难度目标值的编码表示,每2016个区块调整一次。NAT的铸造规则直接引用这一字段:用户在某个区块中铭刻NAT,获得的代币数量就等于该区块bits字段的数值。例如,在区块817,824中铭刻NAT,将获得386,161,170枚代币。这意味着代币供给与比特币全网算力难度呈正向关联,没有任何团队或基金会可以增发或修改规则。
更关键的是分发路径。 $NAT 代币不经过预挖、不分配给团队或VC,而是100%流向矿工——矿工在挖出BTC的同一区块中,自动获得NAT奖励,实现“同算力、同公链、同区块、同地址”的双层收益。这一机制被硬编码在TAP协议源码中,目前仅对dmt-nat代币生效。
截至2026年10月,#NAT 单区块产出约3.86亿枚,总市值约3000万美元,已成为比特币生态中市值最大的代币。F2Pool于4月27日上线NAT区块分发机制,蜘蛛矿池在此之前已率先接入,NAT开始从单一矿池扩展至主流算力入口。据播客节目披露,目前已有超过60%的哈希率、前五大矿池中的四家接入了NAT分发机制。
四、价值锚点:#NAT 为什么能解决真问题
#NAT 的价值锚点可以从三个层次来理解。
第一层是密码学稀缺性。 NAT的“非任意性”不是营销概念,而是可验证的技术事实。任何人都可以独立验证某个区块应铸造多少NAT,无需信任任何中心化索引器。NAT的生命周期完全锚定在比特币的核心机制之内,其发行规则由代码而非意志决定。
第二层是功能锚点。 $NAT 的设计目标直指比特币安全预算问题。其补贴路径呈现清晰的阶梯:
· 单区块 $NAT 奖励达到5万美元(对应市值约500亿美元),可有效覆盖矿工部分运营成本;
· 达到50万美元(对应市值约5000亿美元),将从根本上解决比特币安全预算问题。
这一阶梯并非空中楼阁。有分析指出,NAT价值持续提升有望形成“NAT增值→矿工增收→算力扩容→BTC上涨”的良性循环,部分对冲减半后矿工收入下滑。在3500亿美元市值下, $NAT 将使每个区块的矿工奖励翻倍,从而使51%攻击在经济上变得不可行。
第三层是结构排他性。 #NAT 的矿工补贴机制被硬编码在TAP协议中,其他DMT代币无法使用它是当前唯一享有协议级矿工分发机制的DMT资产。
origin retweeted
Binance Pool quits on Bitcoin and Genesis Digital pivots away from Bitcoin for AI.
What are the long term implications as this trend continues?
Joining @fitzyOG from @tap_protocol and @CincoDoggos to discuss.
xitter.cf/i/spaces/1OxwbnMDvPVJB
origin retweeted
The amount of uninformed people in the comments of this post is not surprisingly high.
People have been indoctrinated to think Bitcoin is perfect and that the difficulty adjustment solves everything. The difficulty adjustment just maintains a 10 min block time, that's it.
The security of Bitcoin is measured by the cost of attack not hash rate. Miners leaving the network increases centralization and reduces the cost of attack.
Binance leaving alone isn't the issue, the issue is the trend of miners leaving the network as more halvings occur. Binance generating billions in revenue cant even mine Bitcoin altruistically, despite Bitcoin's importance. This is a notable data point for the altruism fans, that incentives is what drives behaviors, not virtue.
You would expect that as the network grows in value, now at $1.6 T, the security infrastructure that secures it would grow, but instead we have less miners over time rather than more.
The lack of understanding of simple math is a good indicator that Bitcoin can still fail on its mission. Humanity can fumble this ball by making Bitcoin infinite or taxing all Bitcoin holders.
Don't let it happen, read the NATpaper @natgmi
If you hold Bitcoin, or for that matter, any crypto at all, this @binance news should absolutely terrify you! 😱😳
The fact that one of the wealthiest crypto companies, that generates around 15 Billion dollars per year from the industry has decided to shutdown its mining operations, should be making you massively question Bitcoin’s economic health.
The beating heart of the entire industry, now has companies and their founders such as CZ (who are still happy to bull-post about Bitcoin’s future price every day btw), not even being able to run a profitable mining business around it?! 😳
The maths ain’t mathing I’m afraid 🤔
Bitcoin’s security budget is decaying, and mining pools are shutting down with increasing regularity, and yet the Bitcoin community mostly remains silent on this subject! 🤐
It’s almost like the wealthiest private companies in the crypto ecosystem are happy to see Bitcoin become more and more centralised as long as they can top up their revenues with things like AI data centres.
I’m sorry to say it guys, but Bitcoin is in a LOT of trouble here, and therefore every single digital asset you own is too. 😬
This is a BAD bad sign!
I will continue stacking ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247 (@natgmi) because only that community actually sees what’s happening here, and is actually trying to do something about it.
origin retweeted
Gen Z won't buy Bitcoin at $1T, and meme coins are a woodchipper. @natgmi is one example of the new opportunities they need. We believe in this future, Robinhood or not.





















