It isn’t much better in the US. Comcast has the CBC here in Seattle which was my lifeline to hockey - but no longer. ESPN / Hulu / Prime craziness reigns here.
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
Someone will own this stain on their career forever at @Rogers putting @Sportsnet on a paywall for Monday night hockey. It will eventually fail.
Thanks for promoting us watching #MondayNightFootball
I’m sure your advertising partners are loving the loss in eye balls.
#boycott
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
With Rogers and the NHL freezing fans out of two of the four televised games tonight, feels like a good time to retweet this.
Have NHL fans finally reached a breaking point? - @Ken_Campbell27 thehockeynews.com/news/lates…
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
We're open sourcing TorchNeuron. Your existing @PyTorch code runs on Trainium with one config change, and we're contributing upstream to make PyTorch more hardware-agnostic for everyone. aboutamazon.com/news/innovat…
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
Can't wait to see Ivar Stenberg take on Gavin McKenna tonight. What's that? Oh, never mind. The TSN, Sportsnet, NHL Centre Ice Package and Amazon Prime streams I already pay for don't qualify me to see it. Well, at least I'll get to see Sidney Crosby. What's that? Oh, never mind.
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
Everything Yann said here is roughly correct, and Musk knows it, which is why he responded like a 14-year-old.
Calling @MKBHD’s video “hate” is misguided and highlights the nearly insurmountable issue the Tesla community has with criticism.
There was plenty to criticize about that unveiling and I thought Marques did an incredible job.
He is becoming a great force pushing against the growing movement in tech and now automotive of over promising and under delivering.
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
Calling @MKBHD’s video “hate” is misguided and highlights the nearly insurmountable issue the Tesla community has with criticism.
There was plenty to criticize about that unveiling and I thought Marques did an incredible job.
He is becoming a great force pushing against the growing movement in tech and now automotive of over promising and under delivering.
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
Goodness gracious. Our wedding was in 2010. In Rhinebeck, New York. No taxpayer funds courtesy of President Obama or anyone. I’m sure 2014 in every season was beautiful in the Rose Garden!
This quoted post is unavailable.
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
1) A trade deficit is not a loss
2) The deficit with Canada was $27B last year, not the $90B he keeps using
3) The deficit with Canada exists because American companies buy a lot of cheap Canadian oil
4) Uh, what
Trump: I do not want to lose $90 billion for the privilege of allowing Canada to have a healthcare system and other things that they shouldn't have. They spend our money!
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The statement in the video misstates the US-Canada trade deficit as a $90B loss subsidizing healthcare; the goods and services deficit was $27B in 2025 and stems mainly from US purchases of Canadian oil while Canada's system is funded by its own taxes.
usafacts.org/articles/us-ca…
canada.ca/en/health-cana…
realeconomy.rsmus.com/market-minute-…
ustr.gov/countries-regi…
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
People seem confused about why Tesla is getting so much backlash over its new "flying Roadster." For those of us who were once genuinely enthusiastic about Tesla, this isn't about hating innovation. It's about a long history of broken promises, misleading expectations, and increasingly absurd marketing.
Tesla unveiled the second-generation Roadster in 2017, took customer deposits, and promised deliveries in 2020. Six years past that deadline, it still hasn't delivered the car. Instead, it's demonstrating an even more outrageous version with features that will likely never make it into production. The original 2nd gen Roadster would still be an amazing car today. Why not just deliver what was promised?
Then there's Full Self-Driving. Tesla marketed the idea that Model 3 owners could turn their cars into income-generating robotaxis. That never materialized. Even if the technology eventually gets there, the opportunity has already passed for many early buyers. Timing matters. Delivering something a decade late isn't fulfilling the promise you sold to customers.
And then there's Solar Roof. Unveiled in 2016 as a revolutionary approach to residential solar, it struggled with costs, installation challenges, and adoption far below expectations. After nearly a decade, Tesla discontinued it entirely in August 2026. Another grand vision abandoned, leaving existing customers with a discontinued product to maintain.
Then came the Cybertruck, marketed as a nearly indestructible, revolutionary truck. Instead, we got a vehicle with questionable build quality, numerous recalls, expensive repairs, disappointing results in several real-world off-road tests, and specifications that fell short of the original promises. It literally looks like a dumpster, but aesthetics aside, the collapsing demand speaks volumes about the reality of what Tesla delivered. Another heavily hyped product that fell dramatically short of expectations.
This is how consumer trust erodes. Not through one disappointment, but through years of accumulating them. And this is part of the reason why many people who were once enthusiastic about Tesla have become critical and cynical about it.
But there's something even more fundamental here: Tesla has completely departed from the grounded, practical vision that made so many of us enthusiastic about the company in the first place.
Electric cars were ambitious, but the idea was grounded in reality. People could charge at home, infrastructure could gradually expand, technology could improve, and millions of ordinary people could eventually benefit. There was a realistic path toward mass adoption.
What the hell does a flying Roadster powered by compressed-air thrusters have to do with any of that?
It's an expensive, impractical engineering stunt with enormous packaging, safety, and regulatory challenges, and no credible near-term path toward mass-market usefulness. Modern electric cars already achieve ridiculous acceleration without this nonsense. What practical problem does it solve? Who actually needs it? When will ordinary consumers benefit?
And watching Tesla fans compare this experimental prototype in a Roadster-shaped shell to actual production vehicles people can buy today is ridiculous.
What's especially infuriating is the cult-like mentality surrounding all of this. You can't point out the history of failed promises, question the practicality, or demand realistic timelines without being accused of being a "hater" or having "Elon derangement syndrome."
Tesla deserves recognition for helping make electric cars a reality, but that success doesn't give it a blank check to keep marketing increasingly fantastical promises while failing to deliver on previous commitments.
This isn't hatred. It's disappointment from people who once believed in the company, watched it accomplish extraordinary things, and have since watched it increasingly substitute practical innovation with spectacle and promises.
Elon fanboys are also ignoring a bigger pattern that goes beyond Tesla.
What made many of us enthusiastic about Elon and Tesla and in the first place was a grounded vision of technological progress that could genuinely improve millions of lives. Electric cars were ambitious, but practical, achievable, and useful to ordinary people. Now we're supposed to get excited about flying cars with compressed-air thrusters that have no credible path to mass adoption and solve no meaningful problem for the average consumer.
It's the same kind of thinking behind marketing the colonization of Mars as some urgent necessity for humanity's survival. There's nothing wrong with space exploration, but Earth isn't about to become uninhabitable because of the Sun. We're talking about geological timescales, while humanity faces enormous problems RIGHT NOW: poverty, hunger, access to education, corruption, abuse of power, wars, and a lack of government accountability. We have plenty of very real problems to solve before worrying about humanity's survival on another planet.
And then there's DOGE. I was genuinely excited about the original idea of making government more efficient, reducing waste, and increasing accountability. Instead, we got questionable savings figures, inexperienced people making sweeping decisions, serious concerns over access to sensitive personal information, and an initiative that ultimately fizzled out without delivering its grand promises. Another enormous narrative that fell apart when confronted with reality.
That's what makes all of this so frustrating. It's not that we stopped believing in technological progress. It's that we've watched someone who once pursued grounded, transformative ideas increasingly embrace fantastical promises, political spectacle, and questionable narratives disconnected from practical reality.
And somehow, pointing out this history of disappointment gets you labeled a "hater" or accused of having "Elon derangement syndrome."
The problem isn't dreaming big. It's repeatedly selling people those dreams, failing to deliver, and then expecting everyone to applaud the next, even more ridiculous promise without asking what happened to the last one.
The world doesn't need more spectacular promises. It needs practical solutions to real problems, honest expectations, and accountability for what was promised. That's what made Tesla exciting in the first place, and that's what so many of us feel has been betrayed.
What is the point of ride share bikes if you get take them anywhere because you can’t park them? @VeoMobility @OregonState
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
J'ai écrit que les technologies utilisées par la voiture sauterelle/fer à repasser de #Musk sont connues depuis des décennies, qu'il n'a rien inventé, que c'est juste du marketing indécent pour faire un show technologique, et des centaines de demeurés me sont tombés dessus en me traitant de sale boomer aigri qui mérite ses bouchons solidaires européens (sic!) y compris même @ODelamarche à ma grande surprise, qui avoue ensuite rien n'y connaître mais qui n'a quand même pas hésité à m'insulter publiquement ça ne l'a pas gêné.
Donc encore une fois, cette bagnole sauterelle/fer à repasser ne sert à rien, elle est aussi inutile que le cybertruc est moche.
Et oui, ces technologies sont anciennes, la preuve en images. ⤵️
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
While Canada overwhelmingly voted for a highly educated over achiever for their Prime Minister, Alberta separatists are pinning their hopes on these guys. One of them likely headed to prison for embezzlement.
lol
White House press secretary Katie Zacharia has been fired, less than a week after her first briefing received widespread backlash, multiple media outlets reported Friday.
🔗ctvnews.ca/world/article/whi…
I hate to be the one to burst the Tesla bubble today, but the spectacular “flight” we witnessed at the Roadster reveal needs a little context. The car is carrying around 250kg of compressed air, plus the weight of the tanks, valves and thrusters needed to contain and release it.
Based on the published figures, that gives it roughly 1.5–2 seconds of maximum thrust before the system needs to be refilled.
In short, it's a gimmick.
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
Here we go, the seppies are already claiming the referendum is rigged.
Funny how every time democracy goes against them, it's rigged.
Mark Relph (Never 51) retweeted
So, tell me how this works.
Does all of Canada and its 40 million people just become one state? So Quebec and Saskatchewan are just lumped together?
If that happens, by the way, it becomes the most populated US state, and gets more representatives than any other state... some of whom are going to speak French.
Or do we get 10.... or 13?.... new states? That would mean, of course, an expansion of the Senate and 20 (or 26) Senators hostile enough to the Trump administration to vote for removal - which would need 80 or 84 votes, depending or not if the Canadian territories are granted statehood.
By the way, in this scenario, there would be more Congressional representatives from Canada than from any single US State - and PEI's 3 electoral votes means they are punching WAY above their weight in Presidential elections. Really can't wait for those returns from Nunavut.
What if the US does annex and then Alberta chooses Option 2? If the US isn't respecting Canada's autonomy, why would we expect a single province's right to secede, especially now that it would be completely surrounded?
What about the more than 4 million Canadians who ONLY speak French? Does this new merged countries still have two official languages?
What about when laws are in conflict? Is marijuana still going to be legal everywhere? Can I finally get a goddamn Kinder Surprise in the States? Will I be able to get a direct flight to Cuba from Montreal? Can I use a CB Radio in Ontario?
Or maybe, just maybe, this is Trump being mouthy and not actually thinking about the crap he's spewing?



























