$STRC close to repegging $100
This was not on my bingo card before end of the year.
The amount of fake booking links and call links and weird interactions like this that the average crypto / Blockchain employee receives is insane
The funny thing is most of these employees hold little crypto
Had an "interview" for a blockchain project last week.
Camera was on, we're chatting, and the guy tells me to clone a GitHub repo and run it locally before we go further into the technical round.
I said sure, but first can you do me a favor
hold up 3 fingers in front of your face for me real quick.
He froze.
Didn't move.
Just sat there for a few seconds before the call cut off and he blocked me.
That's when I knew. A real interviewer doesn't glitch out over a random ask like that. A deepfake/AI overlay does.
These "run this repo" scams are getting scary common in crypto and dev hiring right now.
The setup is always the same:
- flattering DM
- real-sounding project
- rushed timeline
- a "quick step" before the call
that's really just remote access or a credential stealer in disguise.
If someone wants you to run code or install something before you've even had a real conversation, that's the whole scam.
Trust the instinct. Stay safe out there.
Everyone should be doing their own checks when interacting on chain, and it just got so much easier
Ill be there!
Let me know if you want to discuss ratings, monitoring, or anything for that matter :)
And its not even market open yet. Congrats to whoever followed @markiplier
ETHBTC chart does look ready for explosive move.
Always check vs BTC when trading crypto, will give you soo much more information you dont have otherwise.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
Marc Casas retweeted
If I was a really sharp unnamed trading firm
>Momentum trading becomes increasingly profitable, and a large percentage of gross book
>These names are extremely illiquid, and liquidating your holdings would kill the market
>See fund that is extremely concentrated in single names
>LP into said fund, knowing the size of the raise and forecastable market impact in single name equities, as well as risk limits (VaR, Vol, DD limit)
>Unwind illiquid single name momentum book into the fresh new buying
>When the market starts to nuke, you know exactly where said fund will begin getting liquidated
>Scoop entire book in one block transaction and buyback the names you sold into the fund's top blasting
Just maybe...
Marc Casas retweeted
Replying to @alexeixbt
basically minmaxing your irl character instead of the videogame one
Popcorn is ready
Completely agree with Luigi here
There's a market for both, but variable always drives the fixed rates imo
Replying to @Bankless @PaulFrambot
Hey @PaulFrambot - I am genuinely so confused, excited to hear a clarification because this makes no sense at all.
Variable rates are like spot price of money. That price moves with monetary policy, inflation expectations, growth, geopolitical risk, and the supply and demand for credit at any given moment. SOFR varies. Fed funds varies. EURIBOR varies. Roughly $3 trillion of repo clears every night on a rate that reprices daily, and it's the deepest, most liquid funding market on earth. Calling variable rates silly shows a lack of understanding about how risk is priced, i.e. not in a vaccuum.
Fixed rates are built on top of this. Ask any swaps desk how they price a fixed leg... off the floating curve. A fixed rate is the market's expectation of the variable path over the term, plus a premium for warehousing the risk that the expectation is wrong. Fixed-rate lending transfers rate risk and charges for the transfer; the risk itself never leaves the system. There is a reason that pre-covid you were able to get a mortgage for 3% and now it costs 7%... and its no coincidence that its correlated to the treasury markets pricing of yields, inflation, growth and monetary policy.
The English speaking world just doesn't know
6 million people watching La Velada del Año live
~520 million native Spanish speakers
1.15%... and counting
English streaming events don’t even come close
Price is the last thing to move.
Mint velocity, redemption concentration, and collateral integrity move first.
DD.xyz improvements spotted




















