Curious observer of the funny business of Life (and the many ways humans are trying to cope with it).

Luxembourg
Joined March 2009
"Money" was never supposed to be a long-term store of value or savings device, but a means of payment that facilitates and lubricates trade/commerce. As such, it's supposed to *circulate* across the economy, not to be hoarded in a vault or under the mattress. "Saving money" means removing it from circulation – and thus depriving it from the very function it's meant to serve.
George Selgin is a prime example of why economics is so dismal. The guy can write 10+ books on economics and have a tremendous knowledge of monetary history and certain concepts. But when he is faced with comprehending the most obvious fact that the vast majority of society has NO INTEREST in being a stock/ETF picker or a real estate investor — he fails miserably. George (the oblivious academic) actually believes that everyone is willfully choosing to become an amateur investor, rather than just saving the money they already earned. The reality is that simply saving money is NOT possible because of perpetual inflation. People are FORCED to become stock pickers and real estate investors. Yes, successful investing deserves a larger return than simply holding money, but it does not follow that simply holding money must be a losing proposition. One must genuinely wonder if George interacts with any humans outside of academia. xitter.cf/GeorgeSelgin/status/21…
3
2
330
Michel Rauchs retweeted
I was running about town yesterday and in meetings so I've only just found out now that the inimitable monetary legend that was Perry Mehrling passed away yesterday. It's an absolute tragedy. He was an absolute hero. RIP xitter.cf/int_mon_econ/status/21…
Perry Mehrling, RIP. According to the History of Economics Society, Perry Mehrling died "Monday night from injury sustained in a fall several days earlier." He was Professor of International Political Economy at Boston University and, previously, longtime Professor of Economics at Barnard College. He was a highly esteemed historian of economics. Here is his homepage: sites.bu.edu/perry/ His last book: "Money and Empire: Charles P. Kindleberger and the Dollar System" amzn.to/47RVhJ2 "Charles Kindleberger ranks as one of the twentieth century's best known and most influential international economists. This book traces the evolution of his thinking in the context of a 'key-currency' approach to the rise of the dollar system, here revealed as the indispensable framework for global economic development since World War II. Unlike most of his colleagues, Kindleberger was deeply interested in history, and his economics brimmed with real people and institutional details. His research at the New York Fed and BIS during the Great Depression, his wartime intelligence work, and his role in administering the Marshall Plan gave him deep insight into how the international financial system really operated. A biography of both the dollar and a man, this book is also the story of the development of ideas about how money works. It throws revealing light on the underlying economic forces and political obstacles shaping our globalized world." Charles Goodhart: "The discipline of economics is balanced, somewhat unsteadily, between two legs, with the skill of the historian on one side and of the mathematical modeler on the other. In the second half of the 20th century, the tide flowed strongly to elevate the second leg and to diminish the first. In this delightful biography of Charlie Kindleberger, a charming and loveable man, Perry Mehrling shows how Charlie, in his chosen role, as an international monetary economist, fought against that tide, often unsuccessfully. Perry writes so beautifully that one would only need a smattering of economics to enjoy the tale; while if one is interested in the history of economic thought in international monetary economics, then this book is, of course, a must read.' amzn.to/47RVhJ2
1
8
1
91
5,848
Mehrling was such an inspiration, not just because he taught us all how to think about money, but because he showed more than anyone else the value of pedagogy, of breaking things down to simple first principle parts. He made it all so stupid simple. It's just balance sheets!
4
2
28
1,654
Michel Rauchs retweeted
REMINDER: They need a credible off ramp from the hyper scaling narrative they’ve been selling for months. Safety concerns are an obvious way to justify the incoming pivot. They also justify taking the whole thing into a closed “Manhattan project” type setting at the government’s expense. This justifies the incoming lockdown. As I predicted in August the scale narrative had run its course due to kimi. Hyper scaling wasn’t about genuine demand expectations. It was about winning the ai race by outspending and bankrupting your competitors. Kimi made that pointless. This is no doubt the asymmetric information Bessent has been alluding to for weeks. There’s going to be a helluva lot of liquidity freed by this move. It’s all going to go flooding into USTs. Happy D day bond guys. 👇
Great observation from Tracy below. But I’ve annotated the chart as I think a lot of people still don’t understand that it was Deepseek that triggered this acute phase of hyper scaling. By going open weight Deepseek commoditised AI ensuring the “there can be only one” race had no choice but to turn to capex spend instead. It’s been a simple “who has the ways and means to moat up most expansively?” ever since. If you’re confused by the economics, it’s because the economics aren’t supposed to make sense. The irrationality of the infrastructure spend is the logic. We’re in the world of Highlander. That means you win by forcing everyone else to go bankrupt. Potentially even yourself (safe in the knowledge that if you do Uncle Sam still inherits the legacy infrastructure.) In that sense it’s no different from the USSR diverting the nation’s entire consumer budget into vast steel plants that no one else could ever afford to match on cost. But if loss leading your way to AI domination through control of compute was the plan, last month’s Kimi moonshot disrupted everything. It’s like beating Russian steel with the invention of a Star Trek replicator. That’s why I’d be surprised if the pace of debt issuance continues on at the projected pace. If anything, Leopold’s blow up implies a pivot towards greater capital efficiency is incoming. Alternatively this is when “the project” begins in earnest. Either way, I’d bet on more secrecy and even more centralisation. The only question now is whether the USG takes control or not. Judging by Anthropic’s previous spat over Pentagon access, this is the point where the statecraft is gonna get complicated. 👇
121
487
94
2,792
912,040
Sadly, Tom passed away earlier in June this year at the age of 89. For many decades he was a tireless advocate for mutual credit, the credit commons, and bottom-up "people's money" backed by a community's productive capacity, and he developed a rich corpus of books, papers, articles, blog posts, videos, and more – most available for free on his website. If you're not familiar with his work, I'd recommend starting with the revised edition of his book "The End of Money and the Future of Civilisation", available here in PDF version by chapter: beyondmoney.net/welcome-to-t….
84
Michel Rauchs retweeted
Picking up on this with more specific ideas for implementation: Any hopes for meaningful top-down reform are elusive due to powerful systemic forces working against it. So it has to be grassroots initiatives, bottom-up, in places where it matters most—i.e. environments starved of credit and liquidity where the lack of cash results in idle stocks and resources (including labour) unable to connect with willing buyers.
Replying to @mrauchs
Multilateral obligation set-off, credit clearing, mutual credit, private currency vouchers, community currencies... The concepts have been proven for centuries. The tools are there. Now we just have to start using them.
1
1
1
517
What world we live in. Frightening and fascinating at the same time.
This humanoid robot training for the “Robot Olympics” in Beijing ran too fast, failed to stop, slammed into a safety cushion, and broke at the waist. Possibly the first career ending injury in robotic athletics.
1
304
Michel Rauchs retweeted
A few people have recently claimed my tweets are actually AI. Apparently I go to great lengths to bypass AI detectors, but these people have seen right through it, as they are connoisseurs of fine human writing. I find this hilarious and don't plan to change my writing style, which has had some AI characteristics long before AI writing existed. As I've said before, it's not AI's style itself that makes it nauseating to read, but the disconnect between the punchy turns of phrase and the shallow substance behind those words. I'm confident enough in the substance of my writing that if my style is AI-like, I take it entirely as a compliment. It's sad what the prevalence of slop has done to us, making us constantly second-guess everything we read. I find it best to stop worrying about whether something is AI and instead read it a second time to see if it reveals more depth than the first time or starts to feel hollow.
36
21
7
193
25,733
10+ years of crypto to get to… trusted custodians
The coldcard compromise is being somewhat shrugged off, correctly, since it revealed nothing new. But what it reminded us of is that there is simply no way to secure crypto. If you custody it with Coinbase or another custodian, they’re frequently hacked and you get no compensation. Custody it yourself, perfectly, and you may lose it to coldcard-like compromises. Same vulnerabilities apply to every hardware wallet and custody company (who all have to make use of possibly compromised hardware and software.) The sad reality is that the legal system remains a far more reliable safeguard of financial assets than cryptography today in most of the developed world. I wish that wasn’t true, but it is. For someone in 70% of the world with a less trustworthy rule of law, crypto may be more secure.
172
Michel Rauchs retweeted
The coldcard compromise is being somewhat shrugged off, correctly, since it revealed nothing new. But what it reminded us of is that there is simply no way to secure crypto. If you custody it with Coinbase or another custodian, they’re frequently hacked and you get no compensation. Custody it yourself, perfectly, and you may lose it to coldcard-like compromises. Same vulnerabilities apply to every hardware wallet and custody company (who all have to make use of possibly compromised hardware and software.) The sad reality is that the legal system remains a far more reliable safeguard of financial assets than cryptography today in most of the developed world. I wish that wasn’t true, but it is. For someone in 70% of the world with a less trustworthy rule of law, crypto may be more secure.
$1.6 million dollars in Bitcoin was drained from my account on July 29th in the Cold Card wallet hack. My Bitcoin was in cold storage. My keys were on a ColdCard device kept in a safety deposit box that had never been connected to the internet. This part's nerdy, but here's what happened: Hackers discovered a vulnerability in the part of the hardware wallet code used to create seed phrases. This allowed them to use AI to brute force guessing seed phrases. I was at our cottage and heard about the hack today. "No way this affects me." I thought. I logged into Wasabi––software that lets me view my bitcoin wallets online. Right away I saw lines of red transaction–withdrawals–and I knew. From 9:36pm - 9:43pm on July 29th, every wallet I had had been emptied. 18.25245043 btc gone. That's just over $1.6 million dollars CAD. Perhaps the hardest part about this is that I did everything right. I never shared my seed phrase with anybody. My devices never touched the internet. Everything was kept in multiple safes and safety deposit boxes. None of it mattered. All because the hardware that created the seed phrase originally had one line in their code from 2021 that had a vulnerability. I'm filing a police report and a report with the Ontario Securities Commission. But I don't expect to recoup anything. A part of me is trying to make sense of what just happened. Or try to figure out a lesson in it. I'm struggling. $1.6 million is a staggering amount of money to have stolen. I guess all that I can think about right now is that I'm so damn happy that I'm an entrepreneur and that my earning potential is under my control. Mark my damn words. I'll recover.
97
30
12
371
217,660
It won't be long until massive anti-trust cases will be brought against the AI frontier labs, and it won't be pretty for the investors (but likely good for everyone else).
should be obvious by now, but OpenAI and Anthropic are just gonna keep cannibalizing all their biggest customers. it’s simply too profitable for them to resist. and it’s already happening: 1. Figma partnered with Anthropic on AI design tools. then Anthropic’s product chief quit Figma’s board, and 3 days later Anthropic launched Claude Design to compete with Figma. CEO Dylan Field said Anthropic was “not consistently candid.” 2. Novo Nordisk uses Claude to help develop drugs. now Anthropic is developing drugs of its own. 3. Microsoft poured billions into OpenAI. now OpenAI is building a Jobs Platform to compete with LinkedIn, and reportedly a code repository to compete with GitHub. Microsoft owns both. 4. Harvey uses Claude to sell AI contract analysis, due diligence, and litigation tools. now Anthropic sells those same workflows through Claude for Legal. 5. Intercom used OpenAI’s Realtime API to build Fin Voice. now OpenAI sells its own voice-and-chat support agent through Presence. 6. Abridge and Ambience build clinical documentation products on OpenAI. now OpenAI sells ChatGPT for Healthcare directly to hospitals with clinical documentation built in. 7. Benchling uses Claude to power its biotech R&D platform. now Anthropic sells its own scientific workbench through Claude Science. the frontier lab playbook is simple: 1. sell their models to the world’s most valuable businesses 2. help wire them into those companies’ most valuable and sensitive work 3. map the business from the inside and find where AI can take over 4. turn those capabilities into their own products and become the customer’s competitor
1
293
This is getting juicy, but kudos @UEFA – this will set an interesting precedent regarding @FIFAcom's previously unchallenged custodianship of global football.
Statement on behalf of UEFA and its 55 National Associations

1
219
Michel Rauchs retweeted
btw anthropic's internal document on this literally said "we don't want it to be known that we are working on this.” it was called project panama. here's exactly what happened: 1: anthropic concluded that books were the cheapest way to build a world-class model because they gave claude curated facts, structured arguments, compelling stories, and writing “an editor would approve of.” 2: once anthropic decided it needed books at enormous scale, its first solution was piracy. it downloaded 7m+ books from online libraries including libgen. the judge later wrote that although anthropic had legal ways to buy them, it chose piracy to avoid what dario amodei called the “legal/practice/business slog.” 3: that piracy created a massive legal risk. so in february 2024, anthropic hired tom turvey, the former head of partnerships for google books, to find a legally safer way of obtaining “all the books in the world.” 4: turvey first contacted major publishers about licensing their catalogs. those attempts didn’t produce agreements, so anthropic chose a route that required no publisher permission: buying millions of physical books through distributors and used-book retailers. 5: within about a year, anthropic spent tens of millions acquiring and scanning millions of books, including many rare and 1/1 titles. one vendor proposal targeted 500,000 to 2 million books in six months. 6: to scan that many books within months, the vendors physically dismantled them. a hydraulic cutter removed each spine. the pages were trimmed to size, fed as loose sheets through high-speed industrial scanners, and converted into searchable PDFs. the paper remains were then sent for recycling. 7: these PDFs were fed into claude as training data. the complete collection became a private, searchable anthropic library that the company planned to “store forever.” the scans aren’t available to the public and were never open-sourced.
🦔AI companies are bulk-buying rare books, scanning them through high-speed machines that cut the spines off, and shredding the originals. A service called ISBNdb facilitates orders of up to a million books and keeps buyers anonymous. Pre-2022 books are premium because they're free of AI-generated text. A federal judge ruled the practice is fair use because eliminating the original means only one copy exists at a time. Anthropic hired the former head of Google Books partnerships to obtain "all the books in the world." My Take This got to me. A bookseller told 404 Media that rare books with almost no surviving copies are being fed into this pipeline. Books that survived wars, fires, and centuries of handling are being shredded so an AI can learn to write a better marketing email. ISBNdb's website literally says "'AI company destroys two million books' is not a headline that generates sympathy," and they still built an entire business around making it happen quietly. They offer NDAs as a feature. They coach clients to call it "digital preservation." I've covered AI companies scraping the internet, torrenting libraries, and stealing music. This is worse because it's irreversible. You can re-upload a website. You can reprint a bestseller. You can't replace the last three copies of an 18th-century botanical text once someone shreds them for training data. And the judge said it's legal. So it's going to accelerate. "We shred rare books and offer NDAs so nobody finds out" is a legitimate business model in 2026. What a timeline. Hedgie🤗
654
10,260
1,136
38,600
4,206,780
Michel Rauchs retweeted
Replying to @earthygirl011
The system
3
18
2
98
4,145
Just one week until CoFi Gathering in Austria! 5 daily themes. Peer-facilitated, peer-led sessions. Real conversations about building economies that work for people and place. Just a few last minute tickets remaining! 🔗 collaborative-finance.net #CoFi #CommonsHub
2
2
112
A new article with @matslats about Collaborative Finance (#CoFi) is now live on the Growing the Commons Substack: growingcommons.substack.com/…
89
The clever marketing of the Nazi party still seems to work like a charm some 90 years later. The name "National Socialist German Workers' Party" was deliberately chosen to simultaneously appeal to two very different constituencies (remember that the Nazis legally accessed power through winning the 1933 elections): – "National German Party" – "Socialist Workers' Party" People simply dropped/ignored the words they didn't identify with and voted for them. The rest is history. Oh, and unlike Elon insinuates, one of the very first acts upon getting into power was to imprison, torture, and kill actual socialists.
Replying to @paulg
Hitler was also left, just a different type of left. Hardcore socialist.
7
7
449
One of the projects I've been working on for a while now – go check it out and let us know what you think!
1
247
I'll be sharing more about @CommonsLabUK in the coming weeks, but in the meantime have a look at the new website we just launched. 🙂 It's still early but the site now brings together a clearer picture of our mission, programme areas, and overall approach, including some initial material introducing the Commons for people less familiar with it – covering, among other things, its history, manifestations, and common myths. I'm genuinely excited about this project and look forward to diving into the actual work now!
103