ex-Google/ initial Borg team/ creator of GCL, https://xitter.cf/t.co/MaQH2UC29d, CUE, etc.

Schwyz, Switzerland
Joined July 2015
Marcel van Lohuizen retweeted
Make GitHub Actions, and the rest of your CI/CD and workflow stack, more powerful with type safety, validation, reusability, and policy enforcement using CUE! How? Easy - check out this hands-on demo from our community member @rawkode: youtube.com/watch?v=MFtQAhIq…
1
6
11
2,807
Marcel van Lohuizen retweeted
📣 Meet the "Shift-Left" Editor. Join us next Tuesday, Nov 18, at 16:00 UTC for a hands-on demo of the new CUE LSP. Get real-time validation, error-checking and language features as you type - right inside your editor. Learn more + call in details: github.com/cue-lang/cue/disc…
4
9
893
Marcel van Lohuizen retweeted
This paper from Tsinghua University and Shanghai Jiao Tong University received perfect scores (6, 6, 6, 6) at NeurIPS 2025! It aims to answer a key question: Does reinforcement learning really make large language models better reasoners? The authors study Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) and find that while it improves accuracy for small k, it doesn’t create new reasoning patterns—meaning the base model still determines the upper limit of reasoning ability. Across six RLVR variants, performance gains plateau, suggesting that current RL setups mainly refine reasoning rather than reinvent it. Interestingly, it’s distillation, not RL, that shows genuine signs of emergent reasoning. This research points to the next frontier for truly self-improving large language models. Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model? Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2504.13837 Page: limit-of-RLVR.github.io Our report: mp.weixin.qq.com/s/2-GDxs8j1… 📬 #PapersAccepted by Jiqizhixin
Thrilled that our paper received the only perfect score at NeurIPS this year. Huge thanks to my collaborators and the reviewers. See you in San Diego! limit-of-rlvr.github.io papercopilot.com/statistics/… credit to @papercopilot
28
269
23
1,754
397,765
Looking forward to this!
Final call! 📣 Join us with Kelsey Hightower tomorrow, Tuesday, Nov 4, at 17:00 UTC to explore the future of configuration with our Configuration Control Plane, and turn configuration from a source of risk into a source of reliability! Register here: luma.com/ysloofz3
1
202
Marcel van Lohuizen retweeted
Today, I'm proud to officially announce CUE Labs! I co-founded CUE Labs with @mpvl_ to build a Configuration Control Plane, solving config chaos with CUE. Our work also provides the stewardship for the @cue_lang open source project. Read more: cue.dev/blog/announcing-cue-…
3
7
444
Marcel van Lohuizen retweeted
🔈#KubeCon London opens in 2 days! Will you be there? Let us know: forms.gle/L62aiNHc1R8tjgPs6 - we’ll save you a cool CUE cap. We’re bringing lots of updates & demos: If you use GitHub Actions, Azure, GitLab, Argo, or K8s, our CUE content can simplify your workflow. Can’t wait! 🚀
1
1
3
638
#CueLang makes it very easy and elegant to add #monitoring to your system (in this example exposing @PrometheusIO scrape endpoints) across environments and deployments, with templating, validation, defaults and even enforcement. Good talk by @cue_lang creator @mpvl_ @cfgmgmtcamp
1
4
23
2,219
Great read!
“Transparent Telemetry for Open-Source Projects” research.swtch.com/telemetry…
7
1,313
Marcel van Lohuizen retweeted
In SF? Come hear @mpvl_ talk about @cue_lang in “Taming Configuration Complexity made Fun in CUE” in the Languages of Infra: Beyond YAML track at @qconsf. qconsf.com/presentation/oct2… #cuelang #QConSF
A must read indeed: testscript is awesome! We use it everywhere in cue to quickly roll out comprehensive test sets that are also reusable for implementations in other languages as a bonus.
1
2
8
Welcome! Hugely excited to work with you all!
Announcement 🔈: the CUE project would like to officially welcome @carmatrocity, @rogpeppe, @mvdan_, and @ddm_tweets. Thread 👇
2
9
Marcel van Lohuizen retweeted
10 years of my technical writing being critiqued by the Go team and I can still hear Rob et al telling me: "Drop Useful. Useful is subjective. And if it's not useful why would it be here anyway?" java.util.Locale: ...
21
28
2
521
Thanks @toshywoshy @KrisBuytaert Hoping to go back to IRL for next year!
@KrisBuytaert @toshywoshy thanks very much for hosting us today, and for all the support and prep work that went in before. Very much appreciated!
1
1
3
Marcel van Lohuizen retweeted
Reminder! Join @mpvl_ and @_myitcv tomorrow for "A practical guide to CUE: patterns for everyday use." Saturday 5 Feb at 1000 CET (UTC+1), part of @fosdem 2022! xitter.cf/cue_lang/status/148715…
On Saturday 5 Feb at 1000 CET (UTC+1), @mpvl_ and @_myitcv will be giving a talk in the Infra Management Dev Room at FOSDEM: “A practical guide to CUE: patterns for everyday use” fosdem.org/2022/schedule/eve… Look forward to seeing you there!
4
1
14
Marcel van Lohuizen retweeted
On Saturday 5 Feb at 1000 CET (UTC+1), @mpvl_ and @_myitcv will be giving a talk in the Infra Management Dev Room at FOSDEM: “A practical guide to CUE: patterns for everyday use” fosdem.org/2022/schedule/eve… Look forward to seeing you there!
Marcel van Lohuizen retweeted
Off the back of this I’ve been playing with #cuelang today and my mind has been slightly blown apart by the idea of basing config generation on a lattice structure and treating types & values as the same thing. Lots of great responses here on ways to test Helm values too 😄
How are people unit testing Helm template files? This is getting sufficiently complex that I want to be able to assert that given certain values passed in, certain output comes out after templating (e.g. setting a value adds a flag to a deployment etc)
2
3
22