Jonatan retweeted
Anne Appelbaum: "Zrozummy to wreszcie, że jeśli Putin przestanie walczyć, wojna się skończy. Jeśli Zełenski przestanie walczyć, Ukraina przestanie istnieć. Losy ziem pod rosyjską okupacją pokazują to bezlitośnie: mordowanie elit, zakaz używania ojczystego języka, grabież majątków i masowe wywożenie dzieci. To dzieje się naprawdę, każdego dnia”.
This is amazing. I also aspire to this level of being unaware. Probably in some domain I’d do the same
Jonatan retweeted
OpenAI’s faster Fourier transform is less a mathematical breakthrough and more a malicious exploit of mathematical traditions.
argmin.net/p/faster-fourier-…
All the companies putting captchas on stupid tasks are ngmi. Like, Calendly needs a captcha, thereby discriminating against my agent, wtf
Jonatan retweeted
I've finally invested in enough unicorns (at seed) that I have confidence in the traits unicorn founders have in common.
If you fail to hone these traits, you will fail to build a $1B+ company in my experience.
/ 1. Velocity consists of speed
Matt Loszak from Aalo showed me this the most: The best founders are viscerally uncomfortable with slow progress.
They feel it as a physical irritant, not an abstract concern.
They obsessively refactor how they’re pursuing goals to identify clever shortcuts and rethink their roadmap from first principles.
Speed leads to high momentum and a compounding returns on knowledge and product.
It’s necessary to maintain your headstart in a market, otherwise the faster competitor will beat you within a couple years.
/ 2. Velocity consists of direction
The best founders regularly surface from heads-down execution to ask whether their path is still the right one — whether a better route to the destination has opened up, or whether the destination itself has shifted.
Pathfinding prevents the common failure mode of executing brilliantly in the wrong direction.
It requires intellectual honesty and the willingness to kill plans that no longer make sense.
The best founders set a recurring quarterly calendar event to re-assess all their goals.
/ 3. Mission alignment
The journey to building a unicorn is long.
Without a mission that goes beyond financial outcome, most founders lose steam and start phoning it in. Then they get surpassed by competitors who are hungrier.
The mission doesn't have to be world-saving — but it has to be genuine to you.
/ 4. Asking for advice and integrating it
The best founders ask smart people for advice and implement the good advice immediately. The moment they’re shown a better way, they update their processes.
They don’t assume they’ll stumble into better ways organically; they set aside time each week to learn from others and shortcut their development.
They assemble a counsel of advisors who are the best in the world at what they do and they sell them on the mission.
/ 5. Brick-by-brick hiring
Adam Guild of Owner showed me this the most.
Unicorn founders treat each early hire as weight-bearing. They run a deliberate process to find the best person in the world for each role — not whoever is closest at hand ("hiring within arm's reach") from their existing networks. (Unless they are the best).
The foundation built in the first ten hires sets the ceiling for everything that follows. A single mis-hire in a key seat early on compounds. Getting this right means the team itself becomes a competitive moat.
Jonatan retweeted
In the same week Trump signed a shock diesel deal with Russia, a Russian cruise missile wiped out 3 entire families in Pryluky in a single strike. Among the dead was 1 year old Kyrylo Maksiuta.
We attended their funerals yesterday.
washingtonpost.com/world/202…
This alongside the human mathematicians guest post on Tao’s blog leads me to believe we’ll have radicalised mathematicians living completely off the grid, doing ancient rituals on black boards and plotting the demise of frontier labs (unsuccessfully because it’s mathematicians)
Well worth reading: proofsandprompts.com/2026/10…
Hackers are simultaneously getting much better and much worse
Last week some of South Korea's biggest banks were hit by a cyberattack. Thanks to a report from CrowdStrike tonight, we now know the entire hack may have been done by a single person. He used a combined stack of an open-source AI penetration tool named ARTEX, DeepSeek v4.1-Flash, GLM-5.3, Grok 4.6, and Claude Code.
I read this completely differently at first. Like, what’s the point of consuming media if you’re not out there living life and risking it for potential glory and enjoyment? But I guess if the bet is $20 on some sports ball thing is neither intellectual nor glorious
i’ve read 146 books in the past year and placed 0 bets in my life #builtdifferent #swag
On the other side of Honing the Craft, there isn’t perfection or a flawless execution, but a mechanical, industrial process.
See boutique vs. Factory
This applies to VC as well btw
Sociologist Richard Sennett wrote a wonderful book about the value of hand craftsmanship in his 2008 book The Craftsman. He traces the long history of why people have valued handmade goods for hundreds of years, even through periods of major technological or industrial advancement, and weaves together an engaging intellectual history involving figures like Aristotle and John Ruskin.
One of the book’s recurring themes is the value of imperfection. Sennett notes that the authors of the Encyclopédie praised the “character” of handmade goods, such as the slightly irregular bubbles in hand-blown glass bottles. He connects this idea to Voltaire, who warned us of the relentless pursuit of perfection. If we learned to embrace these imperfections, Sennett suggests, perhaps we would develop more realistic expectations about life.
This creates an interesting tension at the heart of craftsmanship. A good craftsperson strives to make something as well as they possibly can, yet must ultimately accept that perfection is unattainable because they are imperfect, like all human creatures. Toward the end of the book, Sennett discusses craftsmanship in religious terms. In the Judeo-Christian tradition, he notes, excessive pride is a sin because it risks putting the self in God's place. In this sense, the craftsperson embodies both aspiration and humility.
In Sennett's framing, craftsmanship is not necessarily about whether a machine can replicate the results, but about a human's role in production and what that process can teach us about ourselves. It's not just about materiality, but also spirituality.
Jonatan retweeted
Foundational, a London-based #SpaceTech startup developing #infrastructure for a more precise understanding of #Earth and #orbit, has emerged from #stealth with €9.6 million in pre-Seed funding. 🇬🇧 🛰️ 📍
eu-startups.com/2026/10/lond…
They will do great things and we're very happy to be part of their journey.
The picture below is of me, Hira and Dave (+ two awesome, busy Foundational engineers in the building) late on a Wed night or so out at ground station 0.
Today, Foundational are exiting stealth with a €9.6 million pre-seed round led by us at @inflection_fund and joined by a global team of great funds @BackedVC , @ncsh , Final Frontier and @TypeOneVC .
We've known @HiraVirdee for a couple of years now, most others in the space industry for much longer. He's one of those people that, the more you get to know him, the more you outlandish things you discover about him.
“The short answer is no, and the distinction matters for how the number is read.”
Oh my god, don’t be so weird!!!!
RIP prompting. 2023–2026.
Introducing Ava Studio: your AI content team. Drop in your website, and it researches, scripts, and produces on-brand videos you can edit or ship.
RT + comment your website. We’ll build your first video campaign for free.
Jonatan retweeted
When I stilled worked on biosecurity, I first learned about Debug, a Google project to reduce mosquito populations.
Results from their Singapore pilot are now out.
They crushed mosquito populations, reducing dengue infections by 70% in the process:
There is no good reason for mosquitoes to exist in wealthy countries today.
New technologies can get rid of the mosquito species that cause diseases like dengue, yellow fever, and malaria; and others can prevent them from carrying those diseases.
worksinprogress.co/issue/mos…
So why do mosquitoes still exist?
In a new article for Works in Progress, Maya Rosen explains how state incapacity and risk aversion led to over a decade of delays and billions of unnecessary bites in the United States.
Oxitec, for example, engineered an Aedes aegypti mosquito in such a way that its female offspring would die before adulthood. Through sustained releases, they showed they could reduce local mosquito populations by 80% or more, in field trials.
They sought approval from the USDA in 2010, which then passed it to the FDA, which passed it to the EPA. In 2020, the EPA allowed them to conduct limited field trials in the Florida Keys. Two years ago, their experimental permit expired, and they still need another review before it can be used routinely. Their proposed field trial in California was withdrawn after public opposition.
Another company, MosquitoMate, developed a technique involving Wolbachia, which also suppresses local mosquitoes. They then spent over fifteen years working through the system before finally receiving commercial registration nationwide in 2024.
It seems that, sometimes, the barrier to getting rid of diseases isn’t technology at all. It’s policy and political will.
New products shouldn’t get stuck in regulatory review for so long, especially if the delays are about basic questions like which agency has oversight over the product, rather than testing for safety.
Though some of those uncertainties were being addressed, the broader changes haven’t materialized. After Biden’s 2022 executive order, the agencies planned to update how their coordinated framework was implemented. But Trump rescinded the order last year.
Meanwhile, the EPA unit that reviews new mosquito control products is still a small office backlogged in reviewing a wide range of products.
Mosquitoes are a policy choice. We can get rid of them. Will we choose to?
worksinprogress.co/issue/mos…
Alt-PNT, alt-comms, sovereign high resolution SAR, not to speak of ICBM defense are all things we cannot solve on our own in Europe at the moment. There’s still space to build unjammable, cheap comms and persistent ISR capability in Europe.
The only reason to stick around with your beliefs ends up being that you care abt what is true in technology and business. If there are no good arguments, I will not change my mind.
I’m happy about our radical position here obviously , and it’s the only way I want to invest



















