Honest question: how does the average person capitalize on this?

Honestly, I sold most of my spot crypto and offboarded today. It's just not worth the headache. I don't want to check every single headline about AI math and cryptography research wondering if I'm about to get rugged. I don't want to wonder if every ancient BTC address making a transfer is ECDSA being cracked. I had already refocused most of my time and energy on equities at this point, and Justin Drake's post just killed the rest of my desire to hold crypto. This isn't impulsive, I read hours of counterarguments. 1. People say this is incredibly unlikely. I just don't trust any human to predict the capability ceiling of superhuman mathematical AI. Have seen people be wrong about AI capability ceiling over and over. 2. What if I miss the next great bull cycle? Honestly, that's fine, there's plenty of other assets to trade with less stress of existential left tail risk. 3. People say that we would have bigger problems. Yes, I know that banks etc would also be at risk and society would be a clusterfuck, but the government should step in to save my money (and society) at that point. I don't know that they will for crypto. Plus, why would a malicious practitioner rather burn the whole world down over just stealing infinite crypto? 4. People say this is just like Quantum FUD. Nah, this is much more concrete and near term. This doesn't require a new scientific breakthrough, only the continued march of AI progress that we've been scaling on for years. I got into crypto as a techno optimist but there's other investment expressions of that now. The development of AI (and recently the intersection of bio x AI) is more intellectually interesting to me. Being in crypto feels like being short AI progress, and I do not want to be short AI progress. This is not investment advice, everyone should decide for themselves how they feel about the topic. I am just one random human being on the internet, expressing my thoughts.

What does 200k TPS look like? See for yourself.

THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK HAS BEEN VISITING BIG BANKS TO REVIEW THEIR LOANS TO PRIVATE CREDIT FIRMS, WITH FED OFFICIALS GOING INTO JPMORGAN, WELLS FARGO, BARCLAYS AND MORGAN STANLEY WITH QUESTIONS ABOUT EXPOSURE, RISK MANAGEMENT AND COLLATERAL QUALITY - SEMAFOR

[ ZOOMER ] NEAR INTENTS EXPLOITED, SITE STATUS SHOWS ONGOING INCIDENT IMPACTING MULTIPLE EVM CHAINS: ZACHXBT

Little known fact but @chainlink was one of the first to build a LayerZero v1 DVN. 4 years later, @LayerZero_Core messages are still the #1 sender within their infrastructure. Cool to see the longevity here and shows just how sticky LayerZero is!

$Link 1 HR and 40 mins till Sergey sits down witg DTCC head Dan Doney. 114 trillion in assets under management... the quadfather of quadrillions itself!! Welcome to the big show Linklets.

IF YOU THINK MARKET TOPS HERE I GOT THREE THINGS YOU NEED TO HEAR 1 YOU A BITCH 22 FUCK YOU 333 HIGHER

Roaring Kitty wouldn't fake a hack, drop a memecoin, delete the posts, never publicly deny it wasn't him, all while 'the headband stays on' He wouldn't do that at all.. 😏 solana:7HgfXftRBBqsYtAEYcqjGLQrNJLL6Tww9ek4rE3Apump might be real tbh

DTCC's entire business is being a ledger. Fundamentally, they compete with L1s like Ethereum and Solana--at most, what they are doing in crypto could be seen as adding some bridges, like Solana having an Ethereum bridge or vice versa, or APIs, like a totally centralized bank being gracious enough to offer a heavily permissioned and expensive API into the bank. Ethereum and Solana should view DTCC and similar intermediaries like Broadridge as competitors, to be disrupted and destroyed by a superior, fully peer to peer technology. Ethereum people simping for DTCC to "tokenize on Ethereum" means asking DTCC to mint on Ethereum receipt tokens representing claims back on DTCC's ledger, which remains definitive in all respects. This would be like Solana people begging for assets to be tokenized on Ethereum and then bridged to Solana--fundamentally a very cucked mentality.

okay okay, i admit i have no clue how chainlink works. i'm not going to do the apparently 40 hours worth of required reading and writing to figure this one out since even the biggest bulls all agree the tokenomics are dogshit. i'm rooting for the link marines in spirit though ❤️

*SEC STAFF ISSUES FAQS ON CRYPTO ASSET SECURITIES LAWS APPLICATION *SEC STAFF: TOKEN BUYBACKS ON FUNCTIONAL PROTOCOLS DO NOT CONSTITUTE MANAGERIAL EFFORTS *SEC STAFF: LIQUID STAKING TOKENS ARE DIGITAL COMMODITIES OR TOOLS, NOT SECURITIES *SEC STAFF: MAINTENANCE, ENHANCEMENTS, SYSTEM GRANTS NOT CONSIDERED ESSENTIAL MANAGERIAL EFFORTS *SEC STAFF: PROMOTING CRYPTO UTILITY WITHOUT PROFIT CLAIMS GENERALLY NOT AN INVESTMENT CONTRACT

What if the last 6 years was all just accumulation? What if every institution coming onchain needs Chainlink? What if trillions of dollars of assets come onchain in the coming years? What if? $LINK