@moralsciencelab

Experimental philosophy lab at the University of Granada. Researching moral psychology and experimental jurisprudence.

Granada, Spain
Joined October 2022
Philosophers of X, help! 🙏 Can you spare a few minutes to share your intuitions, and pass this along to colleagues who might not have seen it yet? moralsciencelab.com/intuitio…
1
35
Moral Science Lab retweeted
Philosophers, we need your help We are running a study on philosophers’ intuitions about thought experiments moralsciencelab.com/intuitio… Only takes a few minutes!
4
19
35
4,056
Very happy to invite you to the second online-talk in our series. This thursday, Josh Knobe and Ivar Hannikainen, 4pm, everyone welcome, link in comment.
1
8
1
15
1,364
To celebrate the launch of the xphi-journal and kick-off our talk series, we are happy to invite everyone to this talk by Edouard Machery. Zoom-link below.
1
6
2
7
1,726
Moral Science Lab retweeted
🏆 Lucía Garzón, graduada #UGR, Primer Premio del Certamen Arquímedes 2024 en el área de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades El galardón reconoce la calidad y originalidad de su trabajo 💡 👏 ¡Enhorabuena! ℹ️ canal.ugr.es/noticia/lucia-g…
1
3
828
Please share!
9
1
7
1,537
📢 Se ofertan 29 contratos predoctorales concedidos a @CanalUGR , uno de ellos para trabajar con nosotrxs en el proyecto PID2024 sobre inferencias de estados mentales en el dominio moral! ⏳Plazo de presentación: 18/12/25 🔗investigacion.ugr.es/recurso…
3
1
273
Moral Science Lab retweeted
🚨Exciting new opportunity🚨 Come and work with me and a fantastic team @GoogleDeepMind exploring the political, economic, social and cultural impact of advanced AI technology, including AGI and beyond! The details and application link can be found below!
24
46
15
494
175,242
🎉Thrilled that @lugrzn won First Prize at the Certamen Arquímedes (@CienciaGob) for the best undergraduate-led research in the Social Sciences & Humanities category! A truly well-deserved recognition of her stellar research on the folk concept of consent. Congrats, Lucía!🌟
1
2
1
11
1,165
For anyone interested, the full paper with all the results is available here: sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
220
The journal's homepage is now live: journals.ub.uni-koeln.de/ind… We will soon also be found under xphi.eu. Accepting submissions in about 2 weeks.
3
2
6
3,451
The new journal EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY will soon be accepting submissions!
The journal's homepage is now live: journals.ub.uni-koeln.de/ind… We will soon also be found under xphi.eu. Accepting submissions in about 2 weeks.
1
8
1
25
3,360
Moral Science Lab retweeted
⚖️ 2025 Legal Interpretation and Moral Reasoning Workshop 📍Carmen de la Victoria | 🗓️Nov 5-7 Leading researchers in philosophy, law, and cognitive science explore how moral reasoning shapes legal interpretation @CanalUGR | @moralsciencelab 👉 Program: mscilab.com/workshop
5
7
506
Crosscultural paper on the concept of reasonableness in 10 countries (many years in the making!) led by the excellent Kevin Tobia: law.stanford.edu/publication…
1
2
10
979
The reasonable lies in between the average and the ideal amount of various good things, like reading books or eating vegetables
1
1
131
And similarly between the average and the ideal amount of bad things like lying, cheating or going to war.
1
96
Final call for global collaborators on this replication collaboration on @bioxphi studies — moral psychologists and x-phi researchers wanted! especially based in SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE! global-bioXphi | moral science lab mscilab.com/globalbioxphi/
7
7
1,352
The global bioxphi research initiative has received expressions of interest from 20+ countries, but many world regions remain under-represented. ⬇️ Sign up to take part here ⬇️ mscilab.com/globalbioxphi/
1
1
158
🚨Big news! @JME_BMJ Practical Bioethics journal - new open access companion to JME -- is now officially open for submissions. See the full announcement here linkedin.com/posts/brian-d-e…
1
10
13
1,731
Moral Science Lab retweeted
Upcoming in Cognitive Science, with @xphilosopher: Some behaviors are clearly right or clearly wrong. But for many, it sort of depends... Take replying to emails: when someone replies quickly, that's great. But if they take their time, their tardiness becomes increasingly blameworthy. Blame and praise are a function of the time taken to reply but how exactly do we determine when to blame and when to praise? 1/X
2
11
1
24
4,822