Associate Professor at @S3DatCMU @SCSatCMU & Research Fellow at @AntithesisHQ.

Pittsburgh, PA
Joined September 2018
My research group has a new website! cmu-pasta.github.io
10
2
157
Rohan Padhye retweeted
found a nasty bug with @AntithesisHQ. if a backup is happening during a leap second then the backup would be done/completed without doing a backup.
8
7
1
58
5,015
Time-Traveling Agents! antithesis.com/blog/2026/tim… The Antithesis Multiverse Debugger is now available via API and CLI :-)
What if saying `claude build me a cloud platform make no mistakes` actually worked??? With the newest Antithesis release we have closed the loop and enabled agents to ship reliable systems: antithesis.com/blog/2026/tim…
1
4
1
36
2,100
Hey it's not just me, TIME magazine says so too.
2
140
Rohan Padhye retweeted
What if saying `claude build me a cloud platform make no mistakes` actually worked??? With the newest Antithesis release we have closed the loop and enabled agents to ship reliable systems: antithesis.com/blog/2026/tim…
5
23
12
156
30,383
This is what I imagine it must feel like for @code_monet every day.
met someone and asked him if he likes claude better and he goes “monet?” wow
4
412
Rohan Padhye retweeted
Hot take: Want to kill paper slop? Brutally cap submissions at 1–3 per author per conference. Force authors to filter their own noise instead of treating peer review like a lottery. Bonus: your best work might again get the attention it deserves.
a "controversial" suggestion for ICML/ICLR/NeurIPS: allow area chairs to desk reject ~50% of their batch! as an area chair, i can very quickly scan all papers in my batch and check which ones have a ~0% chance to get accepted. we shouldn't make reviewers spend time on them!
2
1
4
435
I'm excited for SPLASH/ISSTA 2026 this week! If you wanna know what's cooking at Antithesis and why academia should tune in, I'll be giving a REBASE Industry Track on Wednesday at 1:30pm. "Autonomous Testing with Time-Traveling Agents in a Chaotic Multiverse" Preview:
3
3
32
1,634
Rohan Padhye retweeted
arXiv has updated our policy on rate limiting for all submitters. This update was made to fairly distribute moderator time & support the arXiv community of staff, volunteers, readers & authors. Please read our announcement to learn more: blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/up…
79
496
239
1,732
758,164
I'm stoked to author another blog post with @AntithesisHQ ! Distributed Systems + AI + Mutation Testing = Vibes with High Confidence Bonus: 3 serious rqlite bugs that Fable couldn't even...
Mutation testing is a powerful technique that essentially lets you test your testing. Historically, it's been extremely difficult to mutation test test suites for distributed systems -- we've just solved that with a new Antithesis agent skill that creates deep distributed system bugs, then runs them through our bug zapper for you. Read on: antithesis.com/blog/2026/mut…
1
4
43
2,441
Rohan Padhye retweeted
Mutation testing is a powerful technique that essentially lets you test your testing. Historically, it's been extremely difficult to mutation test test suites for distributed systems -- we've just solved that with a new Antithesis agent skill that creates deep distributed system bugs, then runs them through our bug zapper for you. Read on: antithesis.com/blog/2026/mut…
2
7
2
37
5,157
Everyone quoting this post, so here goes me. I'm quite excited for AI + formal methods overall. Folks pointing out that vibe spec'ing is sketchy, but I'm fine if they're made open. Perhaps we need Application Verification Interfaces (AVIs) for agents to inspect claims.
I used Opus 5.5 to formally verify the Claude Agent SDK using Lean. A couple short prompts = 16 PRs fixing various bugs and race conditions. Video attached. TLA+ also works well. I sometimes combine Lean and TLA+ to look for issues around data flow, concurrency, and state mgmt. I don't know either language well, but Claude is excellent at both. This approach is super useful for formally modeling your code and finding bugs that a human probably wouldn't have spotted. Is formal verification the future of coding (or at least, bug finding)?
3
1
26
3,190
Another anecdote. We got *invited* to submit an extended version of a Distinguished (conference) Paper from a April 2025 conference, prepared in 2024. Despite the invitation, it is still under review 1.5 years later, and when it eventually gets published it will be 2+ years old.
Journals today may be rather disorganized. We submitted a paper to a top journal in my field (ACM Transactions on Computer Systems or TOCS) in Jan 27. 8 months passed and it is still "under review." No ETA or any information. Fortunately, @tylergu_jiawei has graduated with a great PhD thesis so the unresponsiveness doesn't matter. I don't want to overly generalize it. But, if students need pubs to convince committees, find a more responsive journal or be aware of the risk.
3
2
14
2,373
I'm grateful to the reviewers for their time---the review quality has generally been quite good thankfully. But I am concerned about the point of going through this exercise given the delta between conducting research and disseminating results.
2
149
many people seem to be upset by >50k submissions to ICLR. i think we should celebrate it! more people are doing AI (including AI safety) research - isn't it amazing? as for how to navigate the growing amount of papers, luckily, Larry Wasserman formulated a solution back in 2012!
26
44
7
363
56,935
This pains me @sigsoft : but it may be time to revert to de-anonymized review. I want to know who's throwing all these papers with AI-written, incomprehensible thickets of words at us. I've got half a mind to decline to review for conferences that don't de-anonymize authors
2
11
1,294
TMLR has faced a deluge of submissions, necessitating stricter desk rejection policies due to limited reviewer capacity Co-EiC Nihar Shah reached out to authors of 10 papers slated for desk reject. Could they answer questions about their *own* submission? medium.com/@TmlrOrg/asking-a…
27
217
95
1,065
706,886
I've gotten into several debates about SE conferences and peer review recently, so I decided to pen down my thoughts. Feedback or rage welcome. Article: rohan.padhye.org/posts/peer-… (Graphic is AI-generated)
7
5
2
41
3,301
💯 - The SE conference experience (attending, reviewing, authoring) has gone totally downhill and my lab is aligning more with PL and Systems these days.
Replying to @DominikWinterer
I'm at an SE event and from what I can tell, SE culture is really broken. It makes me double-down on wanting to preserve what the PL community does.
6
1
1
21
8,442
Super excited to share "A Design Space Exploration of Async/Await". How differently does async/await behave across today's languages? (More than you might expect!) And what *is* "structured concurrency"? Check out our ~interactive~ blog post on the paper: cel.cs.brown.edu/blog/design…
22
100
7
537
34,241
Replying to @moarbugs
Yeah. This is a super interesting direction! We presented something similar at ICSE'26, but we remove the harness/generator entirely and just generate a configuration of and interaction with a running system that we can amplify using in-vivo fuzzing: mpi-softsec.github.io/papers…
1
1
8
546